- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Separation of nanoparticles by flow past a patterned substrate

Rui Zhang* and Joel Koplik†

  • Benjamin Levich Institute and Department of Physics, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA

  • *ruizhang@ccny.cuny.edu
  • †koplik@sci.ccny.cuny.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 85, 026314 – Published 16 February, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.026314

Abstract

Motivated by the problem of efficiently separating nanoparticles of different character held in solution, we investigate trajectory deflection and particle trapping in flows of nanoparticle suspensions past patterned surfaces. We consider rigid atomistic particles suspended in a viscous liquid solvent and driven by a pressure gradient through a channel, one side of which has a pattern of alternating stripes which attract or repel the particles. We first consider van der Waals forces alone, where the wall interaction is obtained by summing over semi-infinite slabs of material having a Lennard-Jones interaction with or without an attractive term, yielding a force field with nontrivial three-dimensional spatial variation. This wall interaction can either trap particles on the attractive stripes or deflect the trajectories of mobile particles away from the direction of mean flow. Using molecular dynamics simulations we determine the motion of particles of different sizes in this potential, and observe distinct but modest deflections of several degrees from the direction of the imposed fluid flow. The effects of electrostatic interactions are considered by decorating the particles and walls with opposite charges, resulting in significantly more trapping and larger deflection angles. We use Langevin simulations to treat the motion of larger particles in the van der Waals case, and again observe particle trapping and deflection, although the numerical details of the results differ from the molecular dynamics simulations. In the Langevin case we are furthermore able to obtain bounds on the deflection angle from an analysis of the associated Fokker-Planck equation. We conclude that patterned surfaces deflect particle trajectories to a degree depending on their size, and may be used as a vector chromatography separation technique.

View figure in article

Synopsis

Nanoparticle Sifting

Published 16 February, 2012

Nanopatterned surfaces could, according to calculations, provide a way to sort tiny particles by size.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (33)

  1. J. C. Giddings, Unified Separation Science (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1991).
  2. J. C. Giddings, Science 260, 1456 (1993).
  3. M. Yamada, M. Nakashima, and M. Seki, Anal. Chem. 76, 5465 (2004).
  4. J. Takagi, M. Yamada, M. Yasuda, and M. Seki, Lab Chip 5, 778 (2005).
  5. Y. Sai, M. Yamada, M. Yasuda, and M. Seki, J. Chromatogr., A 1127, 214 (2006).
  6. M. Yamada and M. Seki, Lab Chip 5, 1233 (2006).
  7. S. Choi and J. Park, Lab Chip 7, 890 (2007).
  8. S. Choi and J. Park, Lab Chip 9, 1962 (2009).
  9. S. Choi, S. Song, C. Choi, and J. Park, Anal. Chem. 81, 50 (2009).
  10. K. D. Dorfman and H. Brenner, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 238, 390 (2001).
  11. K. D. Dorfman and H. Brenner, Phys. Rev. E 65, 052103 (2002).
  12. J. C. Giddings, Anal. Chem. 56, 1258A (1984).
  13. L. R. Huang, E. C. Cox, R. H. Austin, and J. C. Sturm, Science 304, 987 (2004).
  14. J. A. Davis, D. W. Inglis, K. J. Morton, D. A. Lawrence, L. R. Huang, S. Y. Chou, J. C. Sturm, and R. H. Austin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14779 (2006).
  15. P. Mao and J. Han, Lab Chip 9, 586 (2009).
  16. Z. Li and G. Drazer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050602 (2007).
  17. K. J. Morton, K. Loutherback, D. W. Inglis, O. K. Tsui, J. C. Sturm, S. Y. Chou, and R. H. Austin, Lab Chip 8, 1448 (2008).
  18. K. J. Morton, K. Loutherback, D. W. Inglis, O. K. Tsui, J. C. Sturm, S. Y. Chou, and R. H. Austin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7434 (2008).
  19. J. Herrmann, M. Karweit, and G. Drazer, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061404 (2009).
  20. Jr. Frechette and G. Drazer, J. Fluid Mech. 627, 379 (2009).
  21. M. Balvin, E. Sohn, T. Iracki and G. Drazer, J. Frechette, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 078301 (2009).
  22. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation, 2nd ed. (Academic, New York, 2002).
  23. P. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 64, 253 (1921).
  24. F. E. Harris, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 68, 385 (1998).
  25. I. Yeh and M. L. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7 (1999).
  26. J. Hautman and M. L. Klein, Mol. Phys. 75, 379 (1992).
  27. M. Kawata and M. Mikami, Chem. Phys. Lett. 340, 157 (2001).
  28. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, New York, 1984).
  29. J. Bernate and G. Drazer, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 356, 341 (2011).
  30. J. L. Jackson and S. R. Coriell, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 959 (1963).
  31. J. Koplik and G. Drazer, Phys. Fluids 22, 052005 (2010).
  32. M. H. Jacobs, Diffusion Processesa (Springer, New York, 1967).
  33. R. Zwanzig, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3926 (1992).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 85, 026314– Published 16 February, 2012
  • Received 31 October 2011

©2012 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation