Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Magnetic field amplification by small-scale dynamo action: Dependence on turbulence models and Reynolds and Prandtl numbers

Jennifer Schober*

Dominik Schleicher

Christoph Federrath

Ralf Klessen§

Robi Banerjee

  • Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Albert-Überle-Strasse 2, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

  • Institut für Astrophysik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany

  • Monash Centre for Astrophysics (MoCA), School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia, CRAL, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69364 Lyon, France, and Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Albert-Überle-Strasse 2, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

  • Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Albert-Überle-Strasse 2, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

  • Hamburger Sternwarte, Gojenbergsweg 112, D-21029 Hamburg, Germany

  • *schober@stud.uni-heidelberg.de
  • dschleic@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de
  • federrath@uni-heidelberg.de
  • §klessen@uni-heidelberg.de
  • banerjee@hs.uni-hamburg.de

Phys. Rev. E 85, 026303 – Published 3 February, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.026303

Abstract

The small-scale dynamo is a process by which turbulent kinetic energy is converted into magnetic energy, and thus it is expected to depend crucially on the nature of the turbulence. In this paper, we present a model for the small-scale dynamo that takes into account the slope of the turbulent velocity spectrum v()ϑ, where and v() are the size of a turbulent fluctuation and the typical velocity on that scale. The time evolution of the fluctuation component of the magnetic field, i.e., the small-scale field, is described by the Kazantsev equation. We solve this linear differential equation for its eigenvalues with the quantum-mechanical WKB approximation. The validity of this method is estimated as a function of the magnetic Prandtl number Pm. We calculate the minimal magnetic Reynolds number for dynamo action, Rmcrit, using our model of the turbulent velocity correlation function. For Kolmogorov turbulence (ϑ=1/3), we find that the critical magnetic Reynolds number is RmcritK110 and for Burgers turbulence (ϑ=1/2) RmcritB2700. Furthermore, we derive that the growth rate of the small-scale magnetic field for a general type of turbulence is ΓRe(1ϑ)/(1+ϑ) in the limit of infinite magnetic Prandtl number. For decreasing magnetic Prandtl number (down to Pm10), the growth rate of the small-scale dynamo decreases. The details of this drop depend on the WKB approximation, which becomes invalid for a magnetic Prandtl number of about unity.

Article Text

References (46)

  1. M. L. Bernet, F. Miniati, S. J. Lilly, P. P. Kronberg, and M. Dessauges-Zavadsky, Nature (London) 454, 302 (2008).
  2. F. Tavecchio, G. Ghisellini, L. Foschini, G. Bonnoli, G. Ghirlanda, and P. Coppi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, L70 (2010).
  3. A. Neronov and I. Vovk, Science 328, 73 (2010).
  4. A. M. Taylor, I. Vovk, and A. Neronov, Astron. Astrophys. 529, A144 (2011).
  5. D. G. Yamazaki, K. Ichiki, T. Kajino, and G. J. Mathews, Astrophys. J. 646, 719 (2006).
  6. D. R. G. Schleicher and F. Miniati, e-print arXiv:1108.1874.
  7. D. R. G. Schleicher, D. Galli, S. C. O. Glover, R. Banerjee, F. Palla, R. Schneider, and R. S. Klessen, Astrophys. J. 703, 1096 (2009).
  8. M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2743 (1988).
  9. G. Sigl, A. V. Olinto, and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4582 (1997).
  10. R. Beck, Space Sci. Rev. 99, 243 (2001).
  11. S. Sur, D. R. G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee, C. Federrath, and R. S. Klessen, Astrophys. J. 721, L134 (2010).
  12. C. Federrath, S. Sur, D. R. G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee, and R. S. Klessen, Astrophys. J. 731, 62 (2011).
  13. D. R. G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee, S. Sur, T. G. Arshakian, R. S. Klessen, R. Beck, and M. Spaans, Astron. Astrophys. 522, A115 (2010).
  14. D. Ryu, H. Kang, J. Cho, and S. Das, Science 320, 909 (2008).
  15. G. K. Batchelor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 201, 405 (1950).
  16. A. P. Kazantsev, JETP 53, 1806 (1967).
  17. A. P. Kazantsev, JETP 26, 1031 (1968).
  18. K. Subramanian, e-print arXiv:astro-ph/9708216.
  19. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  20. A. A. Schekochihin, S. A. Boldyrev, and R. M. Kulsrud, Astrophys. J. 567, 828 (2002).
  21. I. Rogachevskii and N. Kleeorin, Phys. Rev. E 56, 417 (1997).
  22. N. Kleeorin and I. Rogachevskii, e-print arXiv:astro-ph/1112.3926.
  23. Y. B. Zeldovich, A. A. Ruzmaikin, and D. D. Sokoloff, The Almighty Chance (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
  24. N. Kleeorin, I. Rogachevskii, and D. Sokoloff, Phys. Rev. E 65, 036303 (2002).
  25. N. Kleeorin and I. Rogachevskii, Phys. Rev. E 77, 036307 (2008).
  26. A. Kolmogorov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301 (1941).
  27. J. Burgers, in A Mathematical Model Illustrating the Theory of Turbulence, edited by R. V. Mises and T. V. Kármán, Advances in Applied Mechanics, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1948), pp. 171–199.
  28. Z.-S. She and E. Leveque, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 336 (1994).
  29. S. Boldyrev, Å. Nordlund, and P. Padoan, Astrophys. J. 573, 678 (2002).
  30. R. B. Larson, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 194, 809 (1981).
  31. C. Federrath, J. Roman-Duval, R. S. Klessen, W. Schmidt, and M.-M. Mac Low, Astron. Astrophys. 512, A81 (2010).
  32. V. Ossenkopf and M.-M. Mac Low, Astron. Astrophys. 390, 307 (2002).
  33. C. Federrath, G. Chabrier, J. Schober, R. Banerjee, R. S. Klessen, and D. R. G. Schleicher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 114504 (2011).
  34. G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 151, 421 (1935).
  35. G. K. Batchelor, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1953), Chap. XI, 197S.
  36. H. A. Kramers, Z. Phys. 39, 828 (1926).
  37. L. Mestel and K. Subramanian, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 248, 677 (1991).
  38. W. Schmidt, C. Federrath, M. Hupp, S. Kern, and J. C. Niemeyer, Astron. Astrophys. 494, 127 (2009).
  39. S. I. Vainshtein, JETP 83, 161 (1982).
  40. S. Childress and A. D. Gilbert, Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 37 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1995), 406 pp.
  41. N. E. Haugen, A. Brandenburg, and W. Dobler, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016308 (2004).
  42. R. Benzi, L. Biferale, R. T. Fisher, L. P. Kadanoff, D. Q. Lamb, and F. Toschi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 234503 (2008).
  43. K. Waagan, C. Federrath, and C. Klingenberg, J. Comput. Phys. 230, 3331 (2011).
  44. M.-M. Mac Low and R. S. Klessen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 125 (2004).
  45. C. F. McKee and E. C. Ostriker, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 565 (2007).
  46. G. Chabrier, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 763 (2003).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation