- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Anisotropy in the annihilation dynamics of umbilic defects in nematic liquid crystals

I. Dierking1,*, M. Ravnik2, E. Lark1, J. Healey1, G. P. Alexander2, and J. M. Yeomans2

  • 1University of Manchester, School of Physics and Astronomy, Schuster Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 2Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3NP, United Kingdom

  • *ingo.dierking@manchester.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 85, 021703 – Published 16 February, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021703

Abstract

Umbilic defects of strength s = ±1 were induced in a nematic liquid crystal with negative dielectric anisotropy, confined to Hele-Shaw cells with homeotropic boundary conditions, and their annihilation dynamics followed experimentally. The speeds of individual defects of annihilating defect pairs with strengths of equal magnitude and opposite sign were determined as a function of several externally applied parameters, such as cell gap, electric field amplitude, frequency, and temperature. It was shown that annihilating defects do not approach each other at equal speeds, but that a speed anisotropy is observed, with the positive defect moving faster than the negative one. The defects move more slowly as the strength of the applied electric field or the cell gap is increased. The speed anisotropy is found to be essentially constant for varying external conditions which do not change the material properties of the liquid crystal material, i.e., confinement, electric field amplitude, or frequency. Only for applied conditions that change material properties, such as temperature changing viscosity, does the speed anisotropy vary. The annihilation dynamics was also simulated numerically giving good qualitative agreement with the experiments. Using insight gained from the simulations we interpret the defects’ speed in terms of their overlap and the speed asymmetry as arising from backflow effects and anisotropy in the elastic constants.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (39)

  1. A. J. Bray, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994).
  2. L. Ratke and P. W. Voorhees, Growth and Coarsening (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
  3. M. Kléman, Points, Lines and Walls (Wiley, Chichester, 1983).
  4. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993).
  5. S. Chandrasekhar, Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
  6. I. Dierking, Textures of Liquid Crystals (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003).
  7. H. Orihara and Y. Ishibashi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55, 2151 (1986).
  8. H. Orihara and T. Nagaya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56, 3086 (1987).
  9. I. Chuang, R. Durrer, N. Turok, and B. Yurke, Science 251, 1336 (1991).
  10. I. Chuang, N. Turok, and B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2472 (1991).
  11. I. Chuang, B. Yurke, A. N. Pargellis, and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. E 47, 3343 (1993).
  12. A. N. Pargellis, N. Turok, and B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1570 (1991).
  13. T. Nagaya, H. Hotta, H. Orihara, and Y. Ishibashi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 1572 (1991).
  14. T. Nagaya, H. Hotta, H. Orihara, and Y. Ishibashi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 3511 (1992).
  15. A. N. Pargellis, P. Finn, J. W. Goodby, P. Panizza, B. Yurke, and P. E. Cladis, Phys. Rev. A 46, 7765 (1992).
  16. D.-K. Ding and E. L. Thomas, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 241, 103 (1994).
  17. W. Wang, T. Shiwaku, and T. Hashimoto, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1614 (1998).
  18. H. Toyoki, Phys. Rev. A 42, 911 (1990).
  19. M. Mondello and N. Goldenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5865 (1990).
  20. H. Toyoki, Phys. Rev. E 47, 2558 (1993).
  21. W. G. Jang, V. V. Ginzburg, C. D. Muzny, and N. A. Clark, Phys. Rev. E 51, 411 (1995).
  22. C. Liu and M. Muthukumar, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 7822 (1997).
  23. A. Rapini, J. Phys. (Paris) 34, 629 (1973).
  24. A. Saupe, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 21, 211 (1973).
  25. R. B. Meyer, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 16, 355 (1972).
  26. I. Dierking, O. Marshall, J. Wright, and N. Bulleid, Phys. Rev. E 71, 061709 (2005).
  27. G. Tóth, C. Denniston, and J. M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 105504 (2002).
  28. G. Tóth, C. Denniston, and J. M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. E 67, 051705 (2003).
  29. D. Svensek and S. Zumer, Phys. Rev. E 66, 021712 (2002).
  30. D. Svensek and S. Zumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 155501 (2003).
  31. P. Oswald and J. Ignés-Mullol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 027801 (2005).
  32. C. Blanc, D. Svensek, S. Zumer, and M. Nobili, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 097802 (2005).
  33. C. Denniston, D. Marenduzzo, E. Orlandini, and J. M. Yeomans, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 362, 1745 (2004).
  34. A. N. Beris and B. J. Edwards, Thermodynamics of Flowing Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).
  35. S. Samitsu, Y. Takanishi, and J. Yamamoto, Nat. Mater. 9, 816 (2010).
  36. K. Skarp, S. T. Lagerwall, and B. Stebler, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 60, 215 (1979).
  37. M. L. Magnuson, B. M. Fung, and J. P. Bayle, Liq. Cryst. 19, 823 (1995).
  38. E. I. Kats, V. V. Lebedeva, and S. V. Malinin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 95, 714 (2002).
  39. J. Brugues, J. Ignes-Mullol, J. Casademunt, and F. Sagues, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 037801 (2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 85, 021703– Published 16 February, 2012
  • Received 24 May 2011

©2012 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation