- Access by Xinjiang University
Linear response theory for long-range interacting systems in quasistationary states
Phys. Rev. E 85, 021133 – Published 23 February, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021133
Abstract
Long-range interacting systems, while relaxing to equilibrium, often get trapped in long-lived quasistationary states which have lifetimes that diverge with the system size. In this work, we address the question of how a long-range system in a quasistationary state (QSS) responds to an external perturbation. We consider a long-range system that evolves under deterministic Hamilton dynamics. The perturbation is taken to couple to the canonical coordinates of the individual constituents. Our study is based on analyzing the Vlasov equation for the single-particle phase-space distribution. The QSS represents a stable stationary solution of the Vlasov equation in the absence of the external perturbation. In the presence of small perturbation, we linearize the perturbed Vlasov equation about the QSS to obtain a formal expression for the response observed in a single-particle dynamical quantity. For a QSS that is homogeneous in the coordinate, we obtain an explicit formula for the response. We apply our analysis to a paradigmatic model, the Hamiltonian mean-field model, which involves particles moving on a circle under Hamiltonian dynamics. Our prediction for the response of three representative QSSs in this model (the water-bag QSS, the Fermi-Dirac QSS, and the Gaussian QSS) is found to be in good agreement with -particle simulations for large . We also show the long-time relaxation of the water-bag QSS to the Boltzmann-Gibbs equilibrium state.
Article Text
References (23)
- A. Campa, T. Dauxois, and S. Ruffo, Phys. Rep. 480, 57 (2009).
- Long-Range Interacting Systems, edited by T. Dauxois, S. Ruffo, and L. F. Cugliandolo (Oxford University, New York, 2010).
- F. Bouchet, S. Gupta, and D. Mukamel, Physica A 389, 4389 (2010).
- Y. Y. Yamaguchi, J. Barré, F. Bouchet, T. Dauxois, and S. Ruffo, Physica A 337, 36 (2004).
- M. Joyce and T. Worrakitpoonpon, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P10012; A. Gabrielli, M. Joyce, and B. Marcos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 210602 (2010).
- T. N. Teles, Y. Levin, R. Pakter, and F. B. Rizzato, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P05007.
- S. Gupta and D. Mukamel, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P03015.
- M. Antoni and S. Ruffo, Phys. Rev. E 52, 2361 (1995).
- K. Jain, F. Bouchet, and D. Mukamel, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P11008.
- F. D. Nobre and C. Tsallis, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036115 (2003).
- D. R. Nicholson, Introduction to Plasma Physics (Krieger, Malabar, FL, 1992).
- L. Landau, J. Phys. USSR 10, 25 (1946).
- R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957).
- M. Kac, G. E. Uhlenbeck, and P. C. Hemmer, J. Math. Phys. 4, 216 (1963).
- W. Braun and K. Hepp, Commun. Math. Phys. 56, 101 (1977).
- D. Ruelle, Nonlinearity 22, 855 (2009).
- In this paper, we adopt the following convention to define spatial Fourier and temporal Laplace transforms: An arbitrary function of the canonical coordinate, momentum, and time has the spatial Fourier transform so that the inverse Fourier transform is given by The temporal Laplace transform of for is defined as so that the inverse Laplace transform is given by
where the Laplace contour (LC) is a horizontal line in the complex-
plane that passes above all singularities of
.
- P. H. Chavanis and L. Delfini, Eur. Phys. J. B 69, 389 (2009).
- The model may also be interpreted as a mean-field model of magnetism, though this identification is only superficial in the sense that the dynamics Eq. (2) of the model is very different from that of spins [7].
- V. Latora, A. Rapisarda, and S. Ruffo, Physica D 131, 38 (1999).
- J. Barré, F. Bouchet, T. Dauxois, and S. Ruffo, J. Stat. Phys. 119, 677 (2005).
- R. I. McLachlan and P. Atela, Nonlinearity 5, 541 (1992).
- E. Caglioti and F. Rousset, J. Stat. Phys. 129, 241 (2007); Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 190, 517 (2008).