Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Finite-size scaling in asymmetric systems of percolating sticks

Milan Žeželj*, Igor Stanković, and Aleksandar Belić

  • Scientific Computing Laboratory, Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade, RS-11080 Belgrade, Serbia

  • *milan.zezelj@ipb.ac.rs

Phys. Rev. E 85, 021101 – Published 1 February, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021101

Abstract

We investigate finite-size scaling in percolating widthless stick systems with variable aspect ratios in an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study. A generalized scaling function is introduced to describe the scaling behavior of the percolation distribution moments and probability at the percolation threshold. We show that the prefactors in the generalized scaling function depend on the system aspect ratio and exhibit features that are generic to the whole class of the percolating systems. In particular, we demonstrate the existence of a characteristic aspect ratio for which percolation probability at the threshold is scale invariant and definite parity of the prefactors in the generalized scaling function for the first two percolation probability moments.

Article Text

References (30)

  1. R. Ramasubramaniam, J. Chen, and H. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2928 (2003).
  2. A. Trionfi, D. H. Wang, J. D. Jacobs, L.-S. Tan, R. A. Vaia, and J. W. P. Hsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 116601 (2009).
  3. Y. Hazama, N. Ainoya, J. Nakamura, and A. Natori, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045204 (2010).
  4. X.-Z. Bo, N. G. Tassi, C. Y. Lee, M. S. Strano, C. Nuckolls, and G. B. Blanchet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 203510 (2005).
  5. V. K. Sangwan, A. Behnam, V. W. Ballarotto, M. S. Fuhrer, A. Ural, and E. D. Wiliams, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 043111 (2010).
  6. J. Li, Z.-B. Zhang, M. Östling, and S.-L. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 133103 (2008).
  7. S. Kumar, J. Y. Murthy, and M. A. Alam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 066802 (2005).
  8. L. Hu, D. S. Hecht, and G. Grüner, Nano Lett. 4, 2513 (2004).
  9. Q. Cao, H.-S. Kim, N. Pimparkar, J. P. Kulkarni, C. Wang, M. Shim, K. Roy, M. A. Alam, and J. A. Rogers, Nature (London) 454, 495 (2008).
  10. J. Li and S.-L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155434 (2009).
  11. D. Stauffer, Phys. Lett. A 83, 404 (1981).
  12. J. L. Cardy, J. Phys. A 25, L201 (1992).
  13. R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2670 (1992).
  14. A. Aharony and J.-P. Hovi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1941 (1994).
  15. J.-P. Hovi and A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. E 53, 235 (1996).
  16. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4104 (2000).
  17. R. M. Ziff and M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016129 (2002).
  18. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory, 2nd revised ed. (Taylor and Francis, London, 2003).
  19. G. E. Pike and C. H. Seager, Phys. Rev. B 10, 1421 (1974).
  20. I. Balberg and N. Binenbaum, Phys. Rev. B 28, 3799 (1983).
  21. I. Balberg, N. Binenbaum, and C. H. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1605 (1983).
  22. I. Balberg, C. H. Anderson, S. Alexander, and N. Wagner, Phys. Rev. B 30, 3933 (1984).
  23. J. Bernasconi, Phys. Rev. B 18, 2185 (1978).
  24. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016706 (2001).
  25. I. Stanković, M. Kröger, and S. Hess, Comput. Phys. Commun. 145, 371 (2002).
  26. A. Balaž, O. Prnjat, D. Vudragović, V. Slavnić, I. Liabotis, E. Atanassov, B. Jakimovski, and M. Savić, J. Grid. Comput. 9, 135 (2011).
  27. J. Li and S.-L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 80, 040104 (2009).
  28. M. Plischke and B. Bergersen, Equilibrium Statistical Physics, 3rd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005).
  29. In order to obtain θ0 with high precision successive slopes between points L and L/2 [17] are calculated. The slope is defined as (ln|nL,rnc|ln|nL/2,rnc|)/ln2. This is approximately [a1(r)/a0(r)/ln2](12θ1θ0)Lθ1+θ01/νθ0 when |a0(r)||a1(r)|Lθ1+θ0. Therefore, successive slopes should fall on a straight line when plotted as a function of Lθ1+θ0 with intercept at 1/νθ0. The intercept is not highly sensitive to the value of θ1+θ0. Note that exponent θ0 can not be calculated using successive slopes if a0(r) is close to zero.
  30. The zeroth-order exponent for ΔL,r2 can be calculated using successive slopes for all r because condition |b0(r)||b1(r)|Lθ1+θ0 is always satisfied for large L. The results for the zeroth-order terms are verified by interpolation through antisymmetrizing data points (ΔL,r2ΔL,1/r2)/2.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation