Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Approximate thermodynamic structure for driven lattice gases in contact

Punyabrata Pradhan, Robert Ramsperger, and Udo Seifert

  • II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart D-70550, Germany

Phys. Rev. E 84, 041104 – Published 6 October, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.041104

Abstract

For a class of nonequilibrium systems, called driven lattice gases, we study what happens when two systems are kept in contact and allowed to exchange particles with the total number of particles conserved. For both attractive and repulsive nearest-neighbor interactions among particles and for a wide range of parameter values, we find that, to a good approximation, one could define an intensive thermodynamic variable, such as the equilibrium chemical potential, that determines the final steady state for two initially separated driven lattice gases brought into contact. However, due to nontrivial contact dynamics, there are also observable deviations from this simple thermodynamic law. To illustrate the role of the contact dynamics, we study a variant of the zero-range process and discuss how the deviations could be explained by a modified large-deviation principle. We identify an additional contribution to the large-deviation function, which we call the excess chemical potential, for the variant of the zero-range process as well as the driven lattice gases. The excess chemical potential depends on the specifics of the contact dynamics and is in general a priori unknown. A contact dependence implies that, even though an intensive variable may equalize, the zeroth law could still be violated.

Synopsis

Touching Gases Settle Down

Published 6 October, 2011

Under certain constraints, two lattice gases equilibrate when brought into contact.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (29)

  1. J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
  2. R. K. P. Zia and B. Schmittmann, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P07012.
  3. G. L. Eyink, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn, J. Stat. Phys. 83, 385 (1996).
  4. Y. Oono and M. Paniconi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 130, 29 (1998).
  5. L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 040601 (2001); J. Stat. Phys. 107, 635 (2002).
  6. T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 180601 (2004).
  7. S. Sasa and H. Tasaki, J. Stat. Phys. 125, 125 (2006).
  8. H.-Q. Wang and N. Menon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 158001 (2008).
  9. S. Henkes, C. S. O’Hern, and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 038002 (2007).
  10. Y. Shokef, G. Shulkind, and D. Levine, Phys. Rev. E 76, 030101(R) (2007).
  11. K. Hayashi and S. Sasa, Phys. Rev. E 68, 035104 (2003).
  12. E. Bertin, O. Dauchot, and M. Droz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 120601 (2006).
  13. M. R. Evans and T. Hanney, J. Phys. A 38, R195 (2005).
  14. S. N. Majumdar, M. R. Evans, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 180601 (2005); M. R. Evans, T. Hanney, and S. N. Majumdar, ibid. 97, 010602 (2006).
  15. E. Bertin, K. Martens, O. Dauchot, and M. Droz, Phys. Rev. E 75, 031120 (2007).
  16. S. Katz et al., J. Stat. Phys. 34, 497 (1984); S. Katz, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn, ibid. 34, 497 (1984).
  17. B. Schmittmann and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rep. 301, 45 (1998); R. K. P. Zia, J. Stat. Phys. 138, 20 (2010).
  18. W. Dietrich, P. Fulde, and I. Peschel, Adv. Phys. 29, 527 (1980).
  19. J. Marro, J. L. Lebowitz, H. Spohn, and M. H. Kalos, J. Stat. Phys. 38, 725 (1985); J. L. Valles and J. Marro, ibid. 43, 441 (1986); 49, 89 (1987); K.-t. Leung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 453 (1991); J.-S. Wang, J. Stat. Phys. 82, 1409 (1996).
  20. K.-t. Leung, B. Schmittmann, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1772 (1989).
  21. R. Dickman, Phys. Rev. A 38, 2588 (1988); 41, 2192 (1990); P. L. Garrido, J. Marro, and R. Dickman, Ann. Phys. (NY) 199, 366 (1990).
  22. H. K. Janssen and B. Schmittmann, Z. Phys. B 64, 503 (1986); K.-t. Leung and J. L. Cardy, J. Stat. Phys. 44, 567 (1986); A. Achahbar, P. L. Garrido, J. Marro, and M. A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 195702 (2001); M. A. Muñoz, in Nonequilibrium Statsitical Physics Today, edited by P. L. Garrido, J. Marro, and F. de los Santos, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 1332 (AIP, New York, 2011), p. 111.
  23. P. Pradhan, C. P. Amann, and U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150601 (2010).
  24. A. Achahbar and J. Marro, J. Stat. Phys. 78, 1493 (1995); C. C. Hill, R. K. P. Zia, and B. Schmittmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 514 (1996).
  25. A. Achahbar, P. L. Garrido, and J. Marro, Mol. Phys. 88, 1157 (1996).
  26. H. Touchette, Phys. Rep. 478, 1 (2009).
  27. J. R. Dorfman, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and J. V. Sengers, Annu. Rev. Chem. 45, 213 (1994).
  28. P. L. Garrido, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Maes, and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. A 42, 1954 (1990); 42, 1954 (1990).
  29. G. Grinstein, D. H. Lee, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1927 (1990).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation