Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Approximate action-angle variables for the figure-eight and periodic three-body orbits

Milovan Šuvakov*

V. Dmitrašinović

  • Institute of Physics, Belgrade University, Pregrevica 118, Zemun, P. O. Box 57, SRB-11080 Beograd, Serbia

  • Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan, Permanent address: Institute of Physics, Belgrade University, Pregrevica 118, Zemun, P. O. Box 57, SRB-11080 Beograd, Serbia

  • *suki@ipb.ac.rs
  • dmitrasin@ipb.ac.rs

Phys. Rev. E 83, 056603 – Published 10 May, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056603

Abstract

We use the maximally permutation-symmetric set of three-body coordinates that consist of the “hyper-radius” R=ρ2+λ2, the “rescaled area of the triangle” 32R2|ρ×λ|), and the (braiding) hyperangle ϕ=arctan(2ρ·λλ2ρ2) to analyze the “figure-eight” choreographic three-body motion discovered by Moore [Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3675 (1993)] in the Newtonian three-body problem. Here ρ,λ are the two Jacobi relative coordinate vectors. We show that the periodicity of this motion is closely related to the braiding hyperangle ϕ. We construct an approximate integral of motion G̲ that together with the hyperangle ϕ forms the action-angle pair of variables for this problem and show that it is the underlying cause of figure-eight motion’s stability. We construct figure-eight orbits in two other attractive permutation-symmetric three-body potentials. We compare the figure-eight orbits in these three potentials and discuss their generic features, as well as their differences. We apply these variables to two new periodic, but nonchoreographic, orbits: One has a continuously rising ϕ in time t, just like the figure-eight motion, but with a different, more complex, periodicity, whereas the other one has an oscillating ϕ(t) temporal behavior.

      Article Text

      References (19)

      1. M. Valtonen, H. Karttunen, The Three-Body Problem (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
      2. C. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3675 (1993).
      3. A. Chenciner, R. Montgomery, Ann. Math. 152, 881 (2000).
      4. T. Imai, T. Chiba, and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 201102 (2007).
      5. J. Galán, F. J. Muñoz-Almaraz, E. Freire, E. Doedel, and A. Vanderbauwhede, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 241101 (2002).
      6. T. Fujiwara, H. Fukuda, and H. Ozaki, J. Phys. A 36, 10537 (2003).
      7. T. Fujiwara, H. Fukuda, and H. Ozaki, J. Phys. A 36, 2791 (2003).
      8. T. Fujiwara, H. Fukuda, A. Kameyama, H. Ozaki, and M. Yamada, J. Phys. A 37, 10571 (2004).
      9. R. Broucke, A. Elipe, and A. Riaguas, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 30, 513 (2006).
      10. V. Dmitrašinović, T. Sato, and M. Šuvakov, Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 383 (2009).
      11. T. T. Takahashi, H. Suganuma, Y. Nemoto, and H. Matsufuru, Phys. Rev. D 65, 114509 (2002).
      12. G. C. Rota, Mathematical Snapshots, Killian Faculty Achievement Award Lecture, 1997.
      13. E. T. Whittaker, A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
      14. F. T. Smith, J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1352 (1959); Phys. Rev. 120, 1058 (1960); F. T. Smith, J. Math. Phys. 3, 735 (1962); R. C. Whitten and F. T. Smith, ibid. 9, 1103 (1968).
      15. L. M. Delves, Nucl. Phys. 9, 391 (1958); 20, 275 (1960).
      16. Yu. A. Simonov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 3, 461 (1966) [Yad. Fiz. 3, 630 (1966)].
      17. V. Dmitrašinović, T. Sato, and M. Šuvakov, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054501 (2009).
      18. K.-C. Chen, Discrete Cont. Dyn. S. 7, 85 (2001).
      19. H. Hopf, Math. Ann. 104, 637 (1931).

      Sign In to Your Journals Account

      Filter

      Filter

      Article Lookup

      Enter a citation