Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Lagrangian statistics and flow topology in forced two-dimensional turbulence

B. Kadoch*

D. del-Castillo-Negrete

W. J. T. Bos

K. Schneider

  • M2P2-UMR 6181 CNRS & CMI, Université d’Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA

  • LMFA-UMR 5509 CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1-INSA de Lyon, Ecully, France

  • M2P2-UMR 6181 CNRS & CMI, Université d’Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France

  • *Present address: Mechanical Engineering Program, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, California 92110, USA.

Phys. Rev. E 83, 036314 – Published 23 March, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036314

Abstract

A study of the relationship between Lagrangian statistics and flow topology in fluid turbulence is presented. The topology is characterized using the Weiss criterion, which provides a conceptually simple tool to partition the flow into topologically different regions: elliptic (vortex dominated), hyperbolic (deformation dominated), and intermediate (turbulent background). The flow corresponds to forced two-dimensional Navier-Stokes turbulence in doubly periodic and circular bounded domains, the latter with no-slip boundary conditions. In the double periodic domain, the probability density function (pdf) of the Weiss field exhibits a negative skewness consistent with the fact that in periodic domains the flow is dominated by coherent vortex structures. On the other hand, in the circular domain, the elliptic and hyperbolic regions seem to be statistically similar. We follow a Lagrangian approach and obtain the statistics by tracking large ensembles of passively advected tracers. The pdfs of residence time in the topologically different regions are computed introducing the Lagrangian Weiss field, i.e., the Weiss field computed along the particles’ trajectories. In elliptic and hyperbolic regions, the pdfs of the residence time have self-similar algebraic decaying tails. In contrast, in the intermediate regions the pdf has exponential decaying tails. The conditional pdfs (with respect to the flow topology) of the Lagrangian velocity exhibit Gaussian-like behavior in the periodic and in the bounded domains. In contrast to the freely decaying turbulence case, the conditional pdfs of the Lagrangian acceleration in forced turbulence show a comparable level of intermittency in both the periodic and the bounded domains. The conditional pdfs of the Lagrangian curvature are characterized, in all cases, by self-similar power-law behavior with a decay exponent of order 2.

Article Text

References (32)

  1. J. C. McWilliams, J. Fluid Mech. 146, 21 (1983).
  2. M. Lesieur, Turbulence in Fluids (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997).
  3. D. Elhmaïdi, A. Provenzale, and A. Babiano, J. Fluid Mech. 257, 553 (1993).
  4. C. Beta, K. Schneider, and M. Farge, Comm. Nonlin. Sci. Num. Sim. 8, 533 (2003).
  5. A. Babiano, G. Boffetta, A. Provenzale, and A. Vulpiani, Phys. Fluids 6, 2465 (1994).
  6. D. del-Castillo-Negrete, Phys. Fluids 10, 576 (1998).
  7. D. del-Castillo-Negrete, B. A. Carreras, and V. Lynch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 065003 (2005).
  8. A. Provenzale, A. Babiano, and B. Villone, Chaos Solitons Fractals 5, 2055 (1995).
  9. R. Castilla, J. M. Redondo, P. J. Gámez-Montero, and A. Babiano, Nonlin. Proc. Geophys. 14, 139 (2007).
  10. H. Xu, N. T. Ouellette, and E. Bodenschatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050201 (2007).
  11. W. Braun, F. De Lillo, and B. Eckhardt, J. Turbul. 7, 62, 1468 (2006).
  12. M. Wilczek, O. Kamps, and R. Friedrich, Physica D 237, 2090 (2008).
  13. F. Toschi and E. Bodenschatz, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 375 (2009).
  14. P. K. Yeung, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 115 (2002).
  15. B. Kadoch, W. J. T. Bos, and K. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 184503 (2008).
  16. K. Schneider and M. Farge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 244502 (2005).
  17. P. Angot, C. H. Bruneau, and P. Fabrie, Numer. Math. 81, 497 (1999).
  18. K. Schneider, Comput. Fluids 34, 1223 (2005).
  19. D. Lilly, Phys. Fluids Suppl. II 12, 240 (1969).
  20. J. M. Ottino, The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989).
  21. N. T. Ouellette and J. P. Gollub, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 194502 (2007).
  22. N. T. Ouellette and J. P. Gollub, Phys. Fluids 20, 064104 (2008).
  23. A. Okubo, Deep-Sea Res. 17, 445 (1970).
  24. J. Weiss, Phys. D 48, 273 (1991).
  25. C. Basdevant and T. Philipovitch, Physica D 73, 17 (1994).
  26. S. V. Annibaldi, G. Manfredi, and R. O. Dendy, Phys. Plasmas 9, 791 (2002).
  27. F. Moisy and J. Jiménez, in IUTAM Symposium on Elementary Vortices and Coherent Structures: Significance in Turbulence Dynamics, Kyoto, Japan, 26–28 October 2004, edited by S. Kida (Springer-Verlag, Kyoto, 2006), p. 3.
  28. R. Klages, G. Radons, and I. M. Sokolov (eds.), Anomalous Transport: Foundations and Applications (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008).
  29. R. Metzler, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000).
  30. J. C. R. Hunt, A. Wray, and P. Moin, Center for Turbulence Research Report CTR-S88 (1988).
  31. M. A. Green, C. W. Rowley, and G. Haller, J. Fluid Mech. 572, 111 (2007).
  32. P. Perlekar, S. Sankar Ray, D. Mitra, and R. Pandit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 054501 (2011).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation