Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

From temporal to spatiotemporal dynamics in transitional plane Couette flow

Jimmy Philip and Paul Manneville

  • Laboratoire d’Hydrodynamique, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France

Phys. Rev. E 83, 036308 – Published 14 March, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036308

Abstract

Laboratory experiments point out the existence of patterns made of alternately laminar and turbulent oblique bands in plane Couette flow (PCF) on its way to or from turbulence as the Reynolds number R is varied. Many previous theoretical and numerical works on the problem have considered small-aspect-ratio systems subjected to periodic boundary conditions, while experiments correspond to the opposite limit of large aspect ratio. Here, by means of fully resolved direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations at decreasing R, we scrutinize the transition from temporal to spatiotemporal behavior in systems of intermediate sizes. We show that there exists a streamwise crossover size of order Lx~70–80h (where 2h is the gap between the plates driving the flow) beyond which the transition to or from turbulence in PCF is undoubtedly a spatiotemporal process, with typical scenario turbulent flowriddled regimeoblique pattern laminar flow, whereas below that size it is more a temporal process describable in terms of finite-dimensional dynamical systems with the scenario chaotic flowlaminar flow (via chaotic transients). In the crossover region, the oblique pattern stage is skipped, which leads us to suggest that an appropriate rendering of the patterns observed in experiments needs a faithful account of streamwise correlations at scales at least of the order of that crossover size.

Article Text

References (40)

  1. D. Coles, J. Fluid Mech. 21, 385 (1965).
  2. D. Coles and C. Van Atta, AIAA J. 4, 1969 (1966).
  3. C. Andereck, S. Liu, and H. Swinney, J. Fluid Mech. 164, 155 (1986).
  4. A. Prigent, G. Grégoire, H. Chaté, and O. Dauchot, Physica D 174, 100 (2003).
  5. P. Manneville, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 18, 169 (2004).
  6. S. Bottin, F. Daviaud, P. Manneville, and O. Dauchot, Europhys. Lett. 43, 171 (1998).
  7. S. Bottin, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 11 Orsay, 1998, [tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00001111/en/].
  8. F. Waleffe, Phys. Fluids 15, 1517 (2003).
  9. P. Manneville, Instabilities, Chaos and Turbulence, 2nd ed. (Imperial College Press, London, 2010).
  10. N. Tillmark and H. Alfredsson, J. Fluid Mech. 235, 89 (1992).
  11. A. Prigent, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 11 Orsay, 2001, [tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00261190/en/].
  12. D. Barkley and L. S. Tuckerman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 014502 (2005).
  13. Y. Duguet, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson, J. Fluid Mech. 650, 119 (2010).
  14. A. Meseguer, F. Mellibovsky, M. Avila, and F. Marques, Phys. Rev. E 80, 046315 (2009).
  15. S. Dong, Phys. Rev. E 80, 067301 (2009).
  16. T. Tsukahara, Y. Seki, H. Kawamura, and D. Tochio, in Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena 4, edited by J.A.C. Humphrey (Williamsburg, 2005), p. 935.
  17. D. Moxey and D. Barkley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8091 (2010).
  18. J. Jimenez and P. Moin, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213 (1991).
  19. J. M. Hamilton, J. Kim, and F. Waleffe, J. Fluid Mech. 287, 317 (1995).
  20. M. Nagata, J. Fluid Mech. 217, 519 (1990).
  21. B. Eckhardt, H. Faisst, A. Schmiegel, and T. M. Schneider, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 366, 1297 (2008).
  22. J. F. Gibson, J. Halcrow, and P. Cvitanovic, J. Fluid Mech. 611, 107 (2008).
  23. Y. Duguet, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson, Phys. Fluids 21, 111701 (2009).
  24. T. M. Schneider, D. Marinc, and B. Eckhardt, J. Fluid Mech. 646, 441 (2010).
  25. J. Burke and E. Knobloch, Chaos 17, 037102 (2007).
  26. T. M. Schneider, J. F. Gibson, and J. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 104501 (2010).
  27. M. Cross and P. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
  28. D. Barkley, L. S. Tuckerman, and O. Dauchot, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 137, 012029 (2008).
  29. M. Lagha and P. Manneville, Eur. Phys. J. B 58, 433 (2007).
  30. P. Manneville, Phys. Rev. E 79, 025301 (2009); 79, 039904 (2009).
  31. P. Manneville and J. Rolland, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. doi: (2010).10.1007/s00162-010-0215-5
  32. E. Ott, Scholarpedia 1, 1700 (2006).
  33. J. Gibson, computer code channelflow, a spectral Navier-Stokes simulator in C++ (2010), [www.channelflow.org].
  34. D. Barkley and L. S. Tuckerman, J. Fluid Mech. 576, 109 (2007).
  35. J. Komminaho, A. Lundbladh, and A. Johansson, J. Fluid Mech. 320, 259 (1996).
  36. A. Schmiegel and B. Eckhardt, Europhys. Lett. 51, 395 (2000).
  37. T. M. Schneider, F. DeLillo, J. Buehrle, B. Eckhardt, T. Dörnemann, K. Dörnemann, and B. Freisleben, Phys. Rev E 81, 015301(R) (2010).
  38. A. Lundbladh and A. V. Johansson, J. Fluid Mech. 229, 409 (1991).
  39. P. Manneville (unpublished).
  40. J. Rolland and P. Manneville (unpublished).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation