- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Size and shape of excluded volume polymers confined between parallel plates

Debasish Chaudhuri* and Bela Mulder†

  • FOM Institute AMOLF, Science Park 104, NL-1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • *chaudhuri@amolf.nl
  • †mulder@amolf.nl
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 83, 031803 – Published 18 March, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.031803

Abstract

A number of recent experiments have provided detailed observations of the configurations of long DNA strands under nano-to-micrometer-sized confinement. We therefore revisit the problem of an excluded volume polymer chain confined between two parallel plates with varying plate separation. We show that the nonmonotonic behavior of the overall size of the chain as a function of plate separation, seen in computer simulations and reproduced by earlier theories, can already be predicted on the basis of scaling arguments. However, the behavior of the size in a plane parallel to the plates, a quantity observed in recent experiments, is predicted to be monotonic, in contrast to the experimental findings. We analyze this problem in depth with a mean-field approach that maps the confined polymer onto an anisotropic Gaussian chain, which allows the size of the polymer to be determined separately in the confined and unconfined directions. The theory allows the analytical construction of a smooth crossover between the small-plate-separation de Gennes regime and the large-plate-separation Flory regime. The results show good agreement with molecular dynamics simulations in the presence of a Langevin heat bath and confirm the scaling predictions.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (34)

  1. M. C. Lagomarsino, C. Tanase, J. W. Vos, A. M. C. Emons, B. M. Mulder, and M. Dogterom, Biophys. J. 92, 1046 (2007).
  2. D. N. Fuller, J. P. Rickgauer, P. J. Jardine, S. Grimes, D. L. Anderson, and D. E. Smith, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11245 (2007).
  3. N. Kleckner, D. Zickler, G. F. Jones, J. Dekker, R. Padmore, J. Henle, and J. Hutchinson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12592 (2004).
  4. D. Bates and N. Kleckner, Cell 121, 899 (2005).
  5. S. Jun and B. Mulder, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12388 (2006).
  6. Y. Liu and B. Chakraborty, e-print arXiv:0906.4023.
  7. P.-G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1979).
  8. Y.-L. Chen, M. D. Graham, J. J. de Pablo, G. C. Randall, M. Gupta, and P. S. Doyle, Phys. Rev. E 70, 060901 (2004).
  9. K. Jo, D. M. Dhingra, T. Odijk, J. J. de Pablo, M. D. Graham, R. Runnheim, D. Forrest, and D. C. Schwartz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2673 (2007).
  10. D. J. Bonthuis, C. Meyer, D. Stein, and C. Dekker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 108303 (2008).
  11. H. Uemura, M. Ichikawa, and Y. Kimura, Phys. Rev. E 81, 051801 (2010).
  12. J. O. Tegenfeldt et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10979 (2004).
  13. W. Reisner, K. J. Morton, R. Riehn, Y. M. Wang, Z. Yu, M. Rosen, J. C. Sturm, S. Y. Chou, E. Frey, and R. H. Austin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 196101 (2005).
  14. D. Stein, F. H. J. van der Heyden, W. J. A. Koopmans, and C. Dekker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15853 (2006).
  15. M. Daoud and P.-G. de Gennes, J. Phys. (France) 38, 85 (1977).
  16. F. Brochard and P. G. de Gennes, J. Phys. France Lett. 40, 399 (1979).
  17. Z.-G. Wang, A. M. Nemirovsky, and K. F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 4266 (1987).
  18. D. Romeis and Z. Usatenko, Phys. Rev. E 80, 041802 (2009).
  19. F. Schlesener, A. Hanke, R. Klimpel, and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. E 63, 041803 (2001).
  20. J. H. van Vliet and G. ten Brinke, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 1436 (1990).
  21. J. H. van Vliet, M. C. Luyten, and G. ten Brinke, Macromolecules 25, 3802 (1992).
  22. S. Jun, D. Thirumalai, and B.-Y. Ha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 138101 (2008).
  23. Y. Jung, S. Jun, and B.-Y. Ha, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061912 (2009).
  24. D. I. Dimitrov, A. Milchev, K. Binder, L. I. Klushin, and A. M. Skvortsov, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 234902 (2008).
  25. C. E. Cordeiro, M. Molisana, and D. Thirumalai, J. Phys. II (France) 7, 433 (1997).
  26. D. W. Schaefer, J. F. Joanny, and P. Pincus, Macromolecules 13, 1280 (1980).
  27. P. J. Flory, Principles of Polymer Chemistry (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1953).
  28. S. F. Edwards and P. Singh, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 75, 1001 (1979).
  29. G. Morrison and D. Thirumalai, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 194907 (2005).
  30. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
  31. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications (Academic Press, New York, 2002).
  32. G. S. Grest and K. Kremer, Phys. Rev. A 33, 3628 (1986).
  33. B. Duenweg, M. Stevens, and K. Kremer, in Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science, edited by K. Binder (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
  34. C. Dekker (private communication).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 83, 031803– Published 18 March, 2011
  • Received 3 July 2010

©2011 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation