Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Constant entropy sampling and release waves of shock compressions

Jean-Bernard Maillet*, Emeric Bourasseau, Laurent Soulard, and Jean Clérouin

Gabriel Stoltz

  • CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

  • CERMICS, Project-team MICMAC, Université Paris Est, INRIA-Ecole des Ponts, 6 & 8 Av. Pascal, 77455 Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 2, France

  • *Corresponding author; jean-bernard.maillet@cea.fr

Phys. Rev. E 80, 021135 – Published 31 August, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021135

Abstract

We present or recall several equilibrium methods that allow one to compute isentropic processes, either during the compression or the release of the material. These methods are applied to compute the isentropic release of a shocked monoatomic liquid at high pressure and temperature. Moreover, equilibrium results of isentropic release are compared to the direct nonequilibrium simulation of the same process. We show that due to the viscosity of the liquid but also to nonequilibrium effects, the release of the system is not strictly isentropic.

Article Text

References (33)

  1. D. Tasker, J. H. Goforth, H. Oona, J. King, D. Herrera, and D. Torres, Proceedings of the AIP Conference Shock Compression and Condensed Matter, Portland, Oregon, 2003.
  2. D. Tasker, J. Goforth, H. Oona, P. Rigg, D. Koller, J. King, D. Herrera, D. Torres, F. Sena, F. Abeyta et al., Proceedings of the AIP Conference Shock Compression and Condensed Matter, Baltimore, Maryland, 2005.
  3. G. Lyzenga and T. Ahrens, Proceedings of the AIP Conference Shock Compression and Condensed Matter, Menlo Park, California, 1981.
  4. L. Barker, Proceedings of the AIP Conference Shock Compression and Condensed Matter, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1983.
  5. M. Perez, J. Phys. Colloq. 49, 713 (1988).
  6. J. Nguyen, D. Orlikowski, F. Streitz, N. Holmes, and J. Moriarty, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 023508 (2006).
  7. J. Barnes, P. Blewett, R. McQueen, K. Meyer, and D. Venable, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 727 (1974).
  8. V. Tsypkin, V. Mineev, A. Ivanov, V. Svidinskii, and B. Rozhdestvenskii, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 20, 387 (1975).
  9. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation—From Algorithms to Applications (Academic Press, New York, 2002).
  10. M. Allen and D. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).
  11. B. Holian and P. Lomdahl, Science 280, 2085 (1998).
  12. J.-B. Maillet, M. Mareschal, L. Soulard, R. Ravelo, P. S. Lomdahl, T. C. Germann, and B. L. Holian, Phys. Rev. E 63, 016121 (2000).
  13. J.-B. Maillet and G. Stoltz, Appl. Math. Res. Express 2008, abn004 (2009).
  14. E. Bourasseau, V. Dubois, N. Desbiens, and J.-B. Maillet, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 084513 (2007).
  15. S. Bernard and J.-B. Maillet, Phys. Rev. B 66, 012103 (2002).
  16. L. Verlet, Phys. Rev.159, 98 (1967).
  17. J. Thouvenin, Détonique (CEA, Paris, 1997).
  18. M. Desjarlais, Workshop on accelerator-driven warm dense matter, 2006.
  19. D. Kofke and P. T. Cummings, Mol. Phys. 92, 973 (1997).
  20. W. Smith, M. Lísal, and I. Nezbeda, Chem. Phys. Lett. 426, 436 (2006).
  21. H. Flyvberg and H. G. Petersen, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 461 (1989).
  22. J.-B. Maillet and G. Stoltz, e-print arXiv:0807.0558.
  23. W. Fickett and W. Davis, Detonation (Dover Publication, New York, 1979).
  24. A. Brünger, C. L. Brooks, and M. Karplus, Chem. Phys. Lett. 105, 495 (1984).
  25. S. Nosé, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511 (1984).
  26. W. G. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).
  27. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
  28. W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970).
  29. E. Cancès, F. Legoll, and G. Stoltz, Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 41, 351 (2007).
  30. J. G. Kirkwood, J. Chem. Phys. 3, 300 (1935).
  31. M. Lagache, P. Ungerer, A. Boutin, and A. Fuchs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 4333 (2001).
  32. Since the Hugoniot curve and the isentrope are close enough, we assume that the impact of the viscosity has roughly the same amplitude on the isentrope curve.
  33. The Monte Carlo Gibbs code is owned by the Institut Francais du Pétrole, the Université Paris-Sud, and the CNRS, and developed in collaboration with the CEA.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation