Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Surface growth on diluted lattices by a restricted solid-on-solid model

Changhan Lee and Sang Bub Lee*

  • Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Republic of Korea

  • *Corresponding author; sblee@knu.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. E 80, 021134 – Published 28 August, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021134

Abstract

An influence of diluted sites on surface growth has been investigated, using the restricted solid-on-solid model. It was found that, with respect to equilibrium growth, the surface width and the saturated width exhibited universal power-law behaviors, i.e., Wtβ and WsatLζ, regarding all cases with respect to the concentration of diluted sites x=1p, with p being the occupation probability on each lattice site. For x<xc (=1pc, pc being the percolation threshold), the growth appeared to be similar to that of a regular lattice, both in two and three dimensions. For x=xc, the growth yielded nontrivial exponents which were different from those on a regular lattice. In nonequilibrium growth, a considerable amount of diluted sites (xxc) appeared to yield nonuniversal growth, unlike the case of a regular lattice. The cause of nonuniversal growth dynamics has been investigated, considering the growth on a backbone cluster and on lattices constructed with periodically and randomly diluted subcells.

Article Text

References (49)

  1. F. Family and T. Vicsek, Dynamics of Fractal Surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
  2. A.-L. Barabási and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  3. D. A. Huse and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2708 (1985).
  4. J. M. Burgers, The Nonlinear Diffusion Equation (Reidel, Boston, 1974).
  5. M. J. Vold, J. Colloid Sci. 14, 168 (1959).
  6. M. Kardar and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2087 (1987).
  7. J. M. Kim, M. A. Moore, and A. J. Bray, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2345 (1991).
  8. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).
  9. R. Jullien and R. Botet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2055 (1985).
  10. P. Meakin, P. Ramanlal, L. M. Sander, and R. C. Ball, Phys. Rev. A 34, 5091 (1986).
  11. J. M. Kim and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2289 (1989).
  12. S. F. Edwards and D. R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 381, 17 (1982).
  13. C. Herring, J. Appl. Phys. 21, 301 (1950); W. W. Mullins, ibid. 28, 333 (1957).
  14. F. Family and T. Vicsek, J. Phys. A 18, L75 (1985).
  15. B. M. Forrest and L.-H. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1405 (1990).
  16. J. G. Amar and F. Family, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3399 (1990).
  17. V. G. Miranda and F. D. A. Aarão Reis, Phys. Rev. E 77, 031134 (2008).
  18. T. Halpin-Healy and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995).
  19. L.-H. Tang and H. Leschhorn, Phys. Rev. A 45, R8309 (1992).
  20. S. V. Buldyrev, A.-L. Barabási, F. Caserta, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and T. Vicsek, Phys. Rev. A 45, R8313 (1992).
  21. C. Lee and J. M. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 73, 016140 (2006).
  22. H. S. Song and J. M. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 53, 1802 (2008); 51, 1630 (2007).
  23. G. Poupart and G. Zumofen, Phys. Rev. E 50, R663 (1994).
  24. T. Matsuyama and K. Honda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 2533 (1997).
  25. S. B. Lee, H.-C. Jeong, and J. M. Kim, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008, P12013.
  26. G. Zumofen, J. Klafter, and A. Blumen, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8977 (1992).
  27. S. B. Lee and J. M. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 80, 021101 (2009).
  28. B. K. Chakrabarti and J. Kertész, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 44, 221 (1981); K. Barat and B. K. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rep. 258, 377 (1995).
  29. K. Kremer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 45, 149 (1981).
  30. S. B. Lee and H. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2022 (1988).
  31. A. G. Moreira and R. Dickman, Phys. Rev. E 54, R3090 (1996).
  32. R. Dickman and A. G. Moreira, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1263 (1998).
  33. A. B. Harris, J. Phys. C 7, 1671 (1974).
  34. P. G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1979).
  35. M. P. M. den Nijs, J. Phys. A 12, 1857 (1979).
  36. B. Nienhuis, J. Phys. A 15, 199 (1982).
  37. P. N. Strenski, R. M. Bradley, and J. M. Debierre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1330 (1991).
  38. S. Alexander and R. Orbach, J. Phys. (Paris), Lett. 43, 625 (1982).
  39. S. Havlin and D. Ben-Avraham, Adv. Phys. 51, 187 (2002).
  40. R. M. Ziff and B. Sapoval, J. Phys. A 19, L1169 (1986) and references therein.
  41. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4104 (2000).
  42. X. Feng, Y. Deng, and H. W. J. Blöte, Phys. Rev. E 78, 031136 (2008).
  43. H. G. Ballesteros, L. A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, A. Muñoz Sudepe, G. Parisi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, J. Phys. A 32, 1 (1999).
  44. J. Hoshen and R. Kopelman, Phys. Rev. B 14, 3438 (1976).
  45. C. Vanderzande and A. Komoda, Phys. Rev. A 45, R5335 (1992).
  46. M. D. Rintoul, J. Moon, and H. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. E 49, 2790 (1994).
  47. S. B. Lee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 17, 4867 (2003).
  48. M. D. Rintoul and H. Nakanishi, J. Phys. A 25, L945 (1992).
  49. P. Grassberger, J. Phys. A 25, 5475 (1992).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation