Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Control of spatially patterned synchrony with multisite delayed feedback

C. Hauptmann1,2, O. Omel‘chenko1,2,3, O. V. Popovych1,2, Y. Maistrenko1,2,3, and P. A. Tass1,2,4

  • 1Institute of Neuroscience and Biophysic -3, Research Center Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 2Virtual Institute of Neuromodulation, Research Center Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 3Institute of Mathematics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 4Department of Stereotaxic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 50924 Cologne, Germany and Brain Imaging Center West, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

Phys. Rev. E 76, 066209 – Published 20 December, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.066209

Abstract

We present an analytical study describing a method for the control of spatiotemporal patterns of synchrony in networks of coupled oscillators. Delayed feedback applied through a small number of electrodes effectively induces spatiotemporal dynamics at minimal stimulation intensities. Different arrangements of the delays cause different spatial patterns of synchrony, comparable to central pattern generators (CPGs), i.e., interacting clusters of oscillatory neurons producing patterned output, e.g., for motor control. Multisite delayed feedback stimulation might be used to restore CPG activity in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury or gait ignition disorders.

Article Text

References (32)

  1. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
  2. S. Strogatz, Physica D 143, 1 (2000); G. Kozyreff, A. G. Vladimirov, and P. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3809 (2000); A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization, A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001); S. Boccaletti, J. Kurths, G. Osipov, D. L. Valladares, and C. Zhou, Phys. Rep. 366, 1 (2002); E. Mosekilde, Y. Maistrenko, and D. Postnov, Chaotic Synchronization: Applications to Living Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002); D. M. Abrams and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 174102 (2004); H. Haken, Advanced Synergetics (Springer, Berlin, 1983); A. B. Neiman and D. F. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 138103 (2002); O. Sosnovtseva, D. Setsinsky, A. Fausboll, and E. Mosekilde, Phys. Rev. E 66, 041901 (2002).
  3. A. L. Benabid, P. Pollak, C. Gervason, D. Hoffmann, D. M. Gao, M. Hommel, J. E. Perret, and J. de Rougemont, Lancet 337, 403 (1991).
  4. P. A. Tass, Phase Resetting in Medicine and Biology (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
  5. M. G. Rosenblum and A. S. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 114102 (2004a).
  6. O. V. Popovych, C. Hauptmann, and P. A. Tass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 164102 (2005).
  7. C. Hauptmann, O. Popovych, and P. A. Tass, Biol. Cybern. 93, 463 (2005).
  8. P. A. Tass, C. Hauptmann, and O. Popovych, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 16, 1889 (2006).
  9. E. Marder and R. Calabrese, Physiol. Rev. 76, 687 (1996).
  10. V. Dietz, Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 1379 (2003).
  11. J. Duysens and H. van de Crommert, Gait and Posture 7, 131 (1998).
  12. E. von Holst, Pfluegers Arch. Gesamte Physiol. Menschen Tiere 236, 149 (1935).
  13. M. Bellingham, Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 25, 847 (1998).
  14. R. Yuste, J. N. MacLean, J. Smith, and A. Lansner, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 477 (2005).
  15. A. H. Cohen, G. B. Ermentrout, T. Kiemel, N. Kopell, K. A. Sigvardt, and T. L. Williams, Trends Neurosci. 15, 434 (1992); M. Golubitsky, I. Stewart, P. L. Buono, and J. J. Collins, Nature (London) 401, 693 (1999); C. M. A. Pinto and M. Golubitsky, J. Math. Biol. 53, 474 (2006).
  16. D. Johns, Semin Pediatr. Surg. 4, 152 (1995).
  17. V. Dietz and R. Müller, Brain 127, 2221 (2004).
  18. Note that our approach differs from standard functional electrical stimulation [M.R. Popovic, T. Keller, I. P. Pappas, V. Dietz, and M. Morari, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 20, 82 (2001)], where a neuroprosthesis generates short bursts of electrical pulses that when applied to muscles cause contractions.
  19. K. Pyragas, Phys. Lett. A 170, 421 (1992); 206, 323 (1995); W. Just, S. Popovich, A. Amann, N. Baba, and E. Scholl, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026222 (2003); N. B. Janson, A. G. Balanov, and E. Scholl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 010601 (2004).
  20. M. Rosenblum and A. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. E 70, 041904 (2004).
  21. O. Popovych, C. Hauptmann, and P. A. Tass, Biol. Cybern. 95, 69 (2006).
  22. P. A. Tass and H. Haken, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 100, 303 (1996).
  23. D. Hansel, G. Mato, and C. Meunier, Europhys. Lett. 23, 367 (1993).
  24. In experiments instead of W¯(t), the activity of the whole CPG, one can also use W¯m(t), the activity of the separate parts (i.e., subdomains Dm), and construct an integral activity of the whole CPG with the circular mean W¯(t)=m=14W¯m(t)4, used for feedback [see Eq. (1)].

  25. We choose delays τ1=τ3=118T, τ2=τ4=98T, where T=2πω¯, and polarities p1=p2=1, p3=p4=1, where negative polarity adds a delay of T2.

  26. R. E. Mirollo and S. H. Strogatz, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50, 1645 (1990).
  27. R1=1 corresponds to perfect in-phase synchronization, and R1=0 to absence of in-phase synchronization.

  28. We choose τ14=54T, p1=p3=1, and p2=p4=1.

  29. W. M. Grill and C. C. McIntyre, Thalamus Relat. Syst. 1, 269 (2001).
  30. K. Richardson, B. J. Gluckman, S. L. Weinstein, C. E. Glosch, J. B. Moon, R. P. Gwinn, K. Gale, and S. J. Schiff, Epilepsia 44, 768 (2003).
  31. E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196 (1990); E. R. Hunt, ibid. 67, 1953 (1991); H. Gang and H. Kaifen, ibid. 71, 3794 (1993); H. Gang and Qu Zhilin, ibid. 72, 68 (1994); M. Ding, E. J. Ding, W. L. Ditto, B. Gluckman, V. In, J. H. Peng, M. L. Spano, and W. Yang, Chaos 7, 644 (1997); K. Pyragas, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 364, 2006 (2006).
  32. F. Rubino, Neurologist 8(4), 254 (2002).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation