Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Control of rare intense events in spatiotemporally chaotic systems

Viktor Nagy and Edward Ott

  • University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

Phys. Rev. E 76, 066206 – Published 18 December, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.066206

Abstract

We address the problem of using feedback control for the purpose of suppressing rare intense events in spatially extended systems. As an example, we investigate the use of control to suppress turbulent spikes in the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation in the limit of small dissipation. We explore how information obtained by forecasting can be used to implement spatially and temporally localized control parameter changes and how control strength and cost are related to effectiveness in this framework. The effects of model error and imperfect state measurement are also considered.

Article Text

References (37)

  1. E. Events, in Nature and Society, edited by S. Albeviro, V. Jentsh, and H. Kantz (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006).
  2. A. R. Osborne, M. Onorato, and M. Serio, Phys. Lett. A 275, 386 (2000).
  3. E. J. Boettcher, J. Fineberg, and D. P. Lathrop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2030 (2000).
  4. D. Battogtokh and A. Mikhailov, Physica D 90, 84 (1996); ibid. 106, 327 (1997).
  5. R. J. Wiener, D. C. Dolby, G. C. Gibbs, B. Squires, T. Olsen, and A. M. Smiley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2340 (1999).
  6. W. Lu, D. Yu, and R. G. Harrison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3316 (1996); ibid. 78, 4375 (1997).
  7. R. Roy, T. W. Murphy, T. D. Maier, Z. Gills, and E. R. Hunt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1259 (1992).
  8. E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196 (1990).
  9. K. Pyragas, Phys. Lett. A 170, 421 (1992).
  10. H. Gang and Qu Zhilin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 68 (1994).
  11. R. O. Grigoriev, M. C. Cross, and H. G. Schuster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2795 (1997).
  12. C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 7, 181 (1983).
  13. W. Yang, M. Ding, A. Mandell, and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. E 51, 102 (1995); V. In, M. L. Spano, J. D. Neff, W. L. Ditto, S. Daw, K. D. Edwards, and K. Nyguyen, Chaos 7, 605 (1997). Although these papers consider the suppression of a boundary crisis event, they also clearly apply directly to suppression of intermittent bursts, i.e., “rare intense events” associated with interior crises.
  14. J. Katz, Phys. Today 60, 13 (2007); K. Emanuel, ibid. 60, 13 (2007); R. Simpson and J. Simpson, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 28, 1045 (1966).
  15. T. Bohr, M. H. Jensen, A. Vulpiani, and G. Paladin, Dynamical Systems Approach to Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005), Chap. 5.
  16. A. C. Newell and J. A. Whitehead, J. Fluid Mech. 38, 279 (1969).
  17. G. Ahlers and D. S. Cannell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1583 (1983).
  18. K. Stewartson and J. T. Stuart, J. Fluid Mech. 48, 529 (1971).
  19. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Series in Synergetics Vol. 19) (Springer, New York, 1984).
  20. M. Bartuccelli, J. D. Gibbon, and M. Oliver, Physica D 89, 267 (1996).
  21. A. Mielke, Physica D 117, 106 (1998).
  22. M. Gabbay, E. Ott, and P.N. Guzdar, Physica D 118, 371 (1998).
  23. M. J. Landman, G. C. Papanicolaou, C. Sulem, and P. L. Sulem, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3837 (1988).
  24. B. J. LeMesurier, G. C. Papanicolau, C. Sulem, and P. L. Sulem, Physica D 32, 210 (1988).
  25. G. Fibich and G. C. Papanicolaou, Phys. Lett. A 239, 167 (1998).
  26. C. D. Levermore and D. R. Stark, Phys. Lett. A 234, 269 (1997).
  27. R. E. Wilson, Physica D 112, 329 (1998).
  28. B. P. Luce and C. R. Doering, Phys. Lett. A 178, 92 (1993).
  29. G. Fibich and D. Levy, Phys. Lett. A 249, 286 (1998).
  30. F. Merle and P. Raphael, Commun. Math. Phys. 253, 675 (2005).
  31. F. Merle and P. Raphael, Invent. Math. 156, 565 (2004).
  32. J. W. Kim and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026203 (2003).
  33. In addition to control by modifying an intrinsic parameter of the system (e.g., our discussion of changing the parameter α), one might also envision adding an externally applied “control force” f(x,t) to the right-hand side of Eq. (1) with the intrinsic system unchanged. We note, however, that our changing of α can also be viewed as an external force control with f(x,t) chosen to be iα(α(x,t)α)|u|2u. Other choices for the control force f(x,t) might, e.g., utilize an added nonlinear dissipation [such as m(x,t)|u|σu with σ=2,3,] or an added dispersion [such as ip(x,t)2nu with n=1,2,]. We have tried some of these alternative forms for the control and found that they can also perform well when used in our forecast driven control scenario illustrated in Fig. 5.
  34. A. Doelman and E. S. Titi, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 14, 299 (1993).
  35. R. Montagne and P. Colet, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4017 (1997).
  36. L. Junge and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3736 (2000).
  37. S. Boccaletti, J. Bragard, and F. T. Arecchi, Phys. Rev. E 59, 6574 (1999).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation