- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Elastocapillary coalescence: Aggregation and fragmentation with a maximal size
Phys. Rev. E 76, 060102(R) – Published 12 December, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.060102
Abstract
Aggregation processes generally lead to broad distributions of sizes involving exponential tails. Here, experiments on the capillary-driven coalescence of regularly spaced flexible structures yields a self-similar distribution of sizes with no tail. At a given step, the physical process imposes a maximal size for the aggregates, which appears as the relevant scale for the distribution. A simple toy model involving the aggregation of nearest neighbors exhibits the same statistics. A mean-field theory accounting for a maximal size is in agreement with both experiments and numerics. This approach is extended to iterative fragmentation processes where the largest object is broken at each step.
Article Text
References (27)
- M. von Smoluchowski, Z. Phys. 17, 557 (1916).
- M. Thorn and M. Seesselberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3622 (1994).
- A. A. Lushnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 198302 (2004).
- M. Ballauff and B. A. Wolf, Macromolecules 14, 654 (1981).
- E. Villermaux, P. Marmottant, and J. Duplat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 074501 (2004).
- D. Beysens and C. M. Knobler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1433 (1986).
- F. Family and P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 428 (1988).
- B. Derrida, C. Godrèche, and I. Yekutieli, Phys. Rev. A 44, 6241 (1991).
- E. Villermaux and J. Duplat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 184501 (2003).
- J. Blum et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2426 (2000).
- G. F. Carnevale, Y. Pomeau, and W. R. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2913 (1990).
- L. Frachebourg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1502 (1999).
- W. R. White and P. Wiltzius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3012 (1995).
- E. Rabani, D. R. Rechman, P. L. Geissler, and L. E. Brus, Nature (London) 426, 271 (2003).
- L. P. Bernal, Phys. Fluids 31, 2533 (1988).
- F. Wittel, F. Kun, H. J. Herrmann, and B. H. Kröplin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 035504 (2004).
- L. Oddershede, P. Dimon, and J. Bohr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3107 (1993).
- H. Colina, L. de Arcangelis, and S. Roux, Phys. Rev. B 48, 3666 (1993).
- U. A. Handge, Y. Leterrier, J.-A. E. Månson, and I. M. Sokolov, Europhys. Lett. 48, 280 (1999).
- N. Lecocq and N. Vandewalle, Eur. Phys. J. E 8, 445 (2002).
- Z. Cheng and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2450 (1988).
- D. J. Aldous, Bernoulli 5, 3 (1999).
- F. Leyvraz, Phys. Rep. 383, 95 (2004).
- J. Bico, B. Roman, L. Moulin, and A. Boudaoud, Nature (London) 432, 690 (2004).
- C. Py, R. Bastien, J. Bico, B. Roman, and A. Boudaoud, Europhys. Lett. 77, 44005 (2007).
- S. M. Dammer and D. E.Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 150602 (2004).
- A. N. Kolmogorov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 31, 99 (1941).