Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Distinguishing cancerous from noncancerous cells through analysis of electrical noise

D. C. Lovelady, T. C. Richmond, A. N. Maggi, C.-M. Lo, and D. A. Rabson*

  • Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA

  • *Corresponding author. davidra@ewald.cas.usf.edu

Phys. Rev. E 76, 041908 – Published 11 October, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.041908

Abstract

Since 1984, electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) has been used to monitor cell behavior in tissue culture and has proven sensitive to cell morphological changes and cell motility. We have taken ECIS measurements on several cultures of noncancerous and cancerous human ovarian surface epithelial cells. By analyzing the noise in real and imaginary electrical impedance, we demonstrate that it is possible to distinguish the two cell types purely from the signatures of their electrical noise. Our measures include power-spectral exponents, Hurst and detrended fluctuation analysis, and estimates of correlation time; principal-component analysis combines all the measures. The noise from both cancerous and noncancerous cultures shows correlations on many time scales, but these correlations are stronger for the noncancerous cells.

Article Text

References (22)

  1. I. Giaever and C. R. Keese, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 3761 (1984).
  2. J. H. T. Luong, Anal. Lett. 36, 3147 (2003).
  3. I. Giaever and C. R. Keese, Physica D 38, 128 (1989).
  4. I. Giaever and C. R. Keese, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 7896 (1991).
  5. C.-M. Lo, C. R. Keese, and I. Giaever, Exp. Cell Res. 204, 102 (1993).
  6. C.-M. Lo, C. R. Keese, and I. Giaever, Biophys. J. 69, 2800 (1995).
  7. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd, corrected ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1994).
  8. J. B. Bassingthwaighte, L. S. Liebovitch, and B. J. West, Fractal Physiology (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
  9. G. Rangarajan and M. Ding, Phys. Rev. E 61, 4991 (2000).
  10. B. B. Mandelbrot and J. R. Wallis, Water Resour. Res. 5, 321 (1969).
  11. J. Feder, Fractals (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988).
  12. C.-K. Peng, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. Simons, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. E 49, 1685 (1994).
  13. C.-K. Peng, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Chaos 5, 82 (1995).
  14. A. Goldberger, A. N. Amaral, L. Glass, J. M. Hausdorff, P. Ch. Ivanov, R. G. Mark, J. E. Mietus, G. B. Moody, C.-K. Peng, and H. E. Stanley, Circulation 101, e215 (2000).
  15. M. Lewicki, Network Comput. Neural Syst. 9, R53 (1998).
  16. H. Hotelling, J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 417 (1933).
  17. R. Fürth, Z. Phys. 2, 244 (1920).
  18. B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. van Ness, SIAM Rev. 10, 422 (1968).
  19. L. E. Reichl, A Modern Course in Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998).
  20. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, Cell 100, 57 (2000).
  21. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (Dover, New York, 1972).
  22. E. Keeping, Introduction to Statistical Inference (van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1962; republished Dover, New York, 1995).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation