Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Mean-field analysis of phase transitions in the emergence of hierarchical society

Tsuyoshi Okubo* and Takashi Odagaki

  • Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan

  • *t.okubo@cmt.phys.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. E 76, 036105 – Published 10 September, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036105

Abstract

Emergence of hierarchical society is analyzed by use of a simple agent-based model. We extend the mean-field model of Bonabeau et al. [Physica A 217, 373 (1995)] to societies obeying complex diffusion rules where each individual selects a moving direction following their power rankings. We apply this mean-field analysis to the pacifist society model recently investigated by use of Monte Carlo simulation [Physica A 367, 435 (2006)]. We show analytically that the self-organization of hierarchies occurs in two steps as the individual density is increased and there are three phases: one egalitarian and two hierarchical states. We also highlight that the transition from the egalitarian phase to the first hierarchical phase is a continuous change in the order parameter and the second transition causes a discontinuous jump in the order parameter.

Article Text

References (16)

  1. E. Bonabeau, G. Theraulaz, and J. L. Deneubourg, Physica A 217, 373 (1995).
  2. A. O. Sousa and D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1063 (2000).
  3. D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 14, 237 (2003).
  4. D. Stauffer and J. S. S. Martins, Adv. Complex Syst. 6, 559 (2003).
  5. C. Schulze and D. Stauffer, Adv. Complex Syst. 7, 289 (2004).
  6. D. Stauffer, in Modeling Cooperative Behavior in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Marro, P. L. Garrido, and M. A. Muñoz, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 779 (AIP, New York, 2005), pp. 75–80.
  7. G. G. Naumis, M. del Castillo-Mussot, L. A. Perez, and G. J. Vazquez, Physica A 369, 789 (2006).
  8. G. G. Naumis, M. Del Castillo-Mussot, L. A. Perez, and G. J. Vazquez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17, 403 (2006).
  9. L. K. Gallos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 1329 (2005).
  10. K. Malarz, D. Stauffer, and K. Kulakowski, Eur. Phys. J. B 50, 195 (2006).
  11. T. Odagaki and M. Tsujiguchi, Physica A 367, 435 (2006).
  12. M. Tsujiguchi and T. Odagaki, Physica A 375, 317 (2007).
  13. L. Lacasa and B. Luque, Physica A 366, 472 (2006).
  14. E. Ben-Naim and S. Redner, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2005, L11002 (2005).
  15. E. Ben-Naim, F. Vazquez, and S. Redner, Eur. Phys. J. B 49, 531 (2006).
  16. Bonabeau et al. derived these solutions from a steady state condition (16) in their paper [1]. However, Eq. (16) is inconsistent with Eqs. (2) and (15) of the paper. It seems to state ki=ρ(2Xi1), but this equation is incorrect except for μ=0. Unfortunately a detailed derivation of Eq. (16) was not described. Therefore we can only consider that it would be a miscalculation or misprint.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation