- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Inverse cascades and α effect at a low magnetic Prandtl number

P. D. Mininni

  • NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, Colorado 80307-3000, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. E 76, 026316 – Published 24 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026316

Abstract

Dynamo action in a fully helical Arn’old-Beltrami-Childress flow is studied using both direct numerical simulations and subgrid modeling. Sufficient scale separation is given in order to allow for large-scale magnetic energy buildup. Growth of magnetic energy obtains down to a magnetic Prandtl number PM=RM∕RV close to 0.005, where RV and RM are the kinetic and magnetic Reynolds numbers. The critical magnetic Reynolds number for dynamo action RMc seems to saturate at values close to 20. Detailed studies of the dependence of the amplitude of the saturated magnetic energy with PM are presented. When PM is decreased, numerical experiments are conducted with either RV or RM kept constant. In the former case, the ratio of magnetic to kinetic energy saturates to a value slightly below unity as PM decreases. Examination of energy spectra and structures in real space reveals that quenching of the velocity by a large-scale magnetic field takes place, with an inverse cascade of magnetic helicity and a force-free field at large scale in the saturated regime.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (48)

  1. W.-C. Müller and D. Carati, Phys. Plasmas 9, 824 (2002).
  2. W.-C. Müller and D. Carati, Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 544 (2002).
  3. Y. Ponty, H. Politano, and J.-F. Pinton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 144503 (2004).
  4. P. D. Mininni, D. C. Montgomery, and A. Pouquet, Phys. Fluids 17, 035112 (2005).
  5. P. D. Mininni, D. C. Montgomery, and A. Pouquet, Phys. Rev. E 71, 046304 (2005).
  6. E. N. Parker, Cosmical Magnetic Fields (Clarendon Press, New York, 1979).
  7. P. H. Roberts and G. A. Glatzmaier, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 94, 47 (2001).
  8. M. Kono and P. H. Roberts, Rev. Geophys. 40, 1013 (2002).
  9. K. Noguchi, V. I. Pariev, S. A. Colgate, H. F. Beckley, and J. Nordhaus, Astrophys. J. 575, 1151 (2002).
  10. F. Pétrélis, M. Bourgoin, L. Marié, J. Burguete, A. Chiffaudel, F. Daviaud, S. Fauve, P. Odier, and J.-F. Pinton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 174501 (2003).
  11. D. R. Sisan, W. L. Shew, and D. P. Lathrop, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 135, 137 (2003).
  12. E. J. Spence, M. D. Nornberg, C. M. Jacobson, R. D. Kendrick, and C. B. Forest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 055002 (2006).
  13. R. Monchaux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 044502 (2007).
  14. A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, J. L. Maron, and J. C. McWilliams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 054502 (2004).
  15. Y. Ponty, P. D. Mininni, D. C. Montgomery, J.-F. Pinton, H. Politano, and A. Pouquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 164502 (2005).
  16. A. Schekochihin, N. Haugen, A. Brandenburg, S. Cowley, J. Maron, and J. McWilliams, Astrophys. J. 625, L115 (2005).
  17. P. D. Mininni, Y. Ponty, D. C. Montgomery, J.-F. Pinton, H. Politano, and A. Pouquet, Astrophys. J. 626, 853 (2005).
  18. P. D. Mininni and D. C. Montgomery, Phys. Rev. E 72, 056320 (2005).
  19. A. B. Iskakov, A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, J. C. McWilliams, and M. R. E. Proctor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 208501 (2007).
  20. D. Vincenzi, J. Stat. Phys. 106, 1073 (2002).
  21. S. Boldyrev and F. Cattaneo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 144501 (2004).
  22. A. P. Kazanstev, Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 1031 (1968).
  23. H. K. Moffatt, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1978).
  24. A. Pouquet, U. Frisch, and J. Léorat, J. Fluid Mech. 77, 321 (1976).
  25. M. Meneguzzi, U. Frisch, and A. Pouquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1060 (1981).
  26. A. D. Gilbert, U. Frish, and A. Pouquet, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 42, 151 (1988).
  27. A. Brandenburg, Astrophys. J. 550, 824 (2001).
  28. M. Steenbeck, F. Krause, and K.-H. Rädler, Z. Naturforsch. A 21, 369 (1966).
  29. F. Krause and K.-H. Rädler, Mean-field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Pergamon Press, New York, 1980).
  30. S. Childress and A. D. Gilbert, Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995).
  31. B. Galanti, P. L. Sulem, and A. Pouquet, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 66, 183 (1992).
  32. Y. Ponty, A. Pouquet, and P. L. Sulem, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 79, 239 (1995).
  33. R. Hollerbach, D. J. Galloway, and M. R. E. Proctor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3145 (1995).
  34. V. Archontis, S. B. F. Dorch, and A. Nordlund, Astron. Astrophys. 410, 759 (2003).
  35. P. D. Mininni, Phys. Plasmas 13, 056502 (2006).
  36. P. Frick, R. Stepanov, and D. Sokoloff, Phys. Rev. E 74, 066310 (2006).
  37. O. Podvigina and A. Pouquet, Physica D 75, 471 (1994).
  38. D. D. Holm, Physica D 170, 253 (2002).
  39. D. D. Holm, Chaos 12, 518 (2002).
  40. B. J. Geurts and D. D. Holm, J. Turbul. 7, 1 (2006).
  41. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  42. P. D. Mininni, D. O. Gómez, and S. M. Mahajan, Astrophys. J. 587, 472 (2003).
  43. A. Alexakis, P. D. Mininni, and A. Pouquet, Phys. Rev. E 72, 046301 (2005).
  44. P. D. Mininni, A. Alexakis, and A. Pouquet, Phys. Rev. E 72, 046302 (2005).
  45. U. Müller, R. Stieglitz, and S. Horanyi, J. Fluid Mech. 498, 31 (2004).
  46. J. Léorat, A. Pouquet, and U. Frisch, J. Fluid Mech. 104, 419 (1981).
  47. A. Alexakis, P. D. Mininni, and A. Pouquet, Astrophys. J. 640, 335 (2006).
  48. M. Hossain, W. H. Matthaeus, and D. Montgomery, J. Plasma Phys. 30, 479 (1983).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 76, 026316– Published 24 August, 2007
  • Received 13 February 2007

© 2007 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation