- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Simulations and density functional calculations of surface forces in the presence of semiflexible polymers

Martin Turesson*, Jan Forsman, and Torbjörn Åkesson

  • Theoretical Chemistry, Chemical Centre, P.O. Box 124, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden

  • *martin.turesson@teokem.lu.se
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 76, 021801 – Published 7 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.021801

Abstract

We simulate interactions between adsorbing and nonadsorbing surfaces immersed in solutions containing monodisperse semiflexible chains. Apart from the nature of the surfaces, we investigate responses to changes of the intrinsic chain stiffness, the degree of polymerization, and the bulk concentration. Our simulations display a sufficient accuracy and precision to reveal free-energy barriers that are small on a typical scale of surface force simulations, but still of the same order as the expected van der Waals interactions. Two different approaches have been tested: grand canonical simulations, improved by configurational-biased techniques, and a perturbation method utilizing the isotension ensemble. We find the former to be preferable when the surfaces are nonadsorbing, whereas the isotension approach is superior for calculations of interactions between adsorbing surfaces, especially if the polymers are stiff. We also compare our simulation results with predictions from several versions of polymer density functional theory. We find that a crucial aspect of these theories, in quantitative terms, is that they recognize that end monomers exclude more volume to the surrounding than inner ones do. Those theories provide satisfactorily accurate predictions, particularly when the surfaces are nonadsorbing.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (52)

  1. M. Ruths, H. Yoshizawa, L. J. Fetters, and J. N. Israelachvili, Macromolecules 29, 7193 (1996).
  2. T. Kuhl, Y. Guo, J. L. Alderfer, A. D. Berman, D. Leckband, J. N. Israelachvili, and S. Wen Hui, Langmuir 12, 3003 (1996).
  3. T. Kuhl, A. D. Berman, S. Wen Hui, and J. N. Israelachvili, Macromolecules 31, 8250 (1998).
  4. T. Kuhl, A. D. Berman, S. Wen Hui, and J. N. Israelachvili, Macromolecules 31, 8258 (1998).
  5. H.-W. Hu and S. Granick, Macromolecules 23, 613 (1990).
  6. M. Seitz, C. K. Park, J. Y. Wong, and J. N. Israelachvili, Langmuir 17, 4616 (2001).
  7. G. Sun, M. Kappl, and H.-J. Butt, Colloids Surf., A 250, 203 (2004).
  8. M. Müller and W. Paul, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 719 (1994).
  9. S. K. Kumar, I. Szleifer, and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2935 (1991).
  10. K. K. Mon and B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 31, 956 (1985).
  11. M. N. Rosenbluth and A. W. Rosenbluth, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 356 (1955).
  12. J. Harris and S. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 1298 (1988).
  13. J. I. Siepmann and D. Frenkel, Mol. Phys. 75, 59 (1992).
  14. D. Frenkel, G. C. A. M. Mooij, and B. Smit, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 3053 (1992).
  15. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulations (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996).
  16. J. J. de Pablo, M. Laso, and U. W. Suter, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 2395 (1992).
  17. J. J. de Pablo, M. Laso, and U. W. Suter, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6157 (1992).
  18. M. Parinello and A. Rahman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196 (1980).
  19. B. Svensson and C. E. Woodward, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 4575 (1994).
  20. B. Svensson and C. E. Woodward, Mol. Phys. 87, 1363 (1996).
  21. J. Forsman and C. E. Woodward, Mol. Phys. 90, 637 (1997).
  22. C. H. Bennett, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 245 (1976).
  23. A. Czezowski and C. E. Woodward, Comput. Phys. Commun. 142, 117 (2001).
  24. A. Broukhno, T. Åkesson, B. Jönsson, and P. Vorontsov-Velyaminov, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 1 (2000).
  25. B. Jönsson, A. Broukhno, J. Forsman, and T. Åkesson, Langmuir 19, 9914 (2003).
  26. J. Forsman, A. Broukhno, B. Jönsson, and T. Åkesson, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 413 (2004).
  27. C. E. Woodward, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 3183 (1991).
  28. R. Y. Rubinstein, Simulation and Monte Carlo Methods (Wiley, New York, 1981).
  29. G. Deitrick, L. Scriven, and H. Davis, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2370 (1989).
  30. J. Forsman and C. E. Woodward, Mol. Simul. 19, 85 (1997).
  31. M. K. Fenwick and F. A. Escobedo, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 3066 (2004).
  32. T. L. Hill, An Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics (Dover, New York, 1986).
  33. C. E. Woodward and A. Yethiraj, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3181 (1994).
  34. J. Forsman and C. E. Woodward, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 1889 (2003).
  35. S. Nordholm, M. Johnson, and B. C. Freasier, Aust. J. Chem. 33, 2139 (1980).
  36. P. Tarazona and R. Evans, Mol. Phys. 52, 847 (1984).
  37. Y. C. Chiew, Mol. Phys. 70, 129 (1990).
  38. Y. Song, S. M. Lambert, and J. M. Prausnitz, Macromolecules 27, 441 (1994).
  39. T. Boublik, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 471 (1970).
  40. G. A. Mansoori, N. F. Carnahan, K. E. Starling, and T. W. Leland, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 1523 (1971).
  41. J. K. Percus and G. J. Yevick, Phys. Rev. 110, 1 (1958).
  42. M. S. Wertheim, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 7323 (1987).
  43. D. Cao and J. Wu, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 4210 (2004).
  44. K. G. Honnell and C. K. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4481 (1991).
  45. R. Dickman and C. K. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 4108 (1986).
  46. J. M. Wichert, H. S. Gulati, and C. K. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7669 (1996).
  47. J. Chang and S. I. Sandler, Chem. Eng. Sci. 49, 2777 (1994).
  48. J. M. H. M. Scheutjens and G. J. Fleer, Macromolecules 18, 1882 (1985).
  49. J. Forsman, C. E. Woodward, and B. C. Freasier, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7672 (2003).
  50. M. Müller, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9930 (2002).
  51. J. Forsman and C. E. Woodward, Macromolecules 39, 1261 (2006).
  52. J. Forsman and C. E. Woodward, Macromolecules 39, 1269 (2006).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 76, 021801– Published 7 August, 2007
  • Received 3 May 2007

© 2007 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation