Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stopping and time reversal of light in dynamic photonic structures via Bloch oscillations

Stefano Longhi

  • Dipartimento di Fisica and Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie del CNR, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy

Phys. Rev. E 75, 026606 – Published 9 February, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.026606

Abstract

It is theoretically shown that storage and time reversal of light pulses can be achieved in a coupled-resonator optical waveguide by dynamic tuning of the cavity resonances without maintaining the translational invariance of the system. The control exploits the Bloch oscillation motion of a light pulse in the presence of a refractive index ramp, and it is therefore rather different from the mechanism of adiabatic band compression and reversal proposed by Yanik and Fan in recent works [Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 083901 (2004); 93, 173903 (2004)].

Article Text

References (25)

  1. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 083901 (2004).
  2. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 173903 (2004).
  3. M. F. Yanik, W. Suh, Z. Wang, and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 233903 (2004).
  4. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013803 (2005).
  5. M. Notomi and S. Mitsugi, Phys. Rev. A 73, 051803(R) (2006).
  6. Z. Gaburro, M. Ghulinyan, F. Riboli, L. Pavesi, A. Recati, and I. Carusotto, Opt. Express 14, 7270 (2006).
  7. E. J. Reed, M. Soljacic, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 203904 (2003).
  8. E. J. Reed, M. Soljacic, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 133901 (2003).
  9. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Stud. Appl. Math. 115, 233 (2005).
  10. N. Stefanou and A. Modinos, Phys. Rev. B 57, 12127 (1998).
  11. A. Yariv, Y. Xu, R. K. Lee, and A. Scherer, Opt. Lett. 24, 711 (1999).
  12. M. Bayindir, B. Temelkuran, and E. Ozbay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2140 (2000).
  13. C. M. de Sterke, J. N. Bright, P. A. Krug, and T. E. Hammon, Phys. Rev. E 57, 2365 (1998).
  14. S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. E 64, 047201 (2001); Opt. Lett. 30, 786 (2005).
  15. R. Sapienza, P. Costantino, D. Wiersma, M. Ghulinyan, C. J. Oton, and L. Pavesi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 263902 (2003).
  16. U. Peschel, T. Persch, and F. Lederer, Opt. Lett. 23, 1701 (1998).
  17. R. Morandotti, U. Peschel, J. S. Aitchison, H. S. Eisenberg, and Y. Silberberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4756 (1999); T. Pertsch, P. Dannberg, W. Elflein, A. Bräuer, and F. Lederer, ibid. 83, 4752 (1999); G. Lenz, I. Talanina, and C. M. de Sterke, ibid. 83, 963 (1999).
  18. S. Olivier, C. Smith, M. Rattier, H. Benisty, C. Weisbuch, T. Krauss, R. Houdre, and U. Oesterle, Opt. Lett. 26, 1019 (2001).
  19. J. K. S. Poon, L. Zhu, G. A. DeRose, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 31, 456 (2006).
  20. D. N. Christodoulides and K. Efremidis, Opt. Lett. 27, 568 (2002).
  21. D. H. Dunlap and V. M. Kenkre, Phys. Rev. B 34, 3625 (1986).
  22. J. Callaway, Quantum Theory of the Solid State (Academic Press, New York, 1974), pp. 465–478.
  23. T. Hartmann, F. Keck, H. J. Korsch, and S. Mossmann, New J. Phys. 6, 1 (2004).
  24. For a sinusoidal modulation, Eq. (1) admits of a quasienergy band and the condition J0(α0Ω)=0 corresponds to the collapse of the quasienergy band [M. Holthaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 351 (1992)]. More generally, for a fast sinusoidal modulation α(t)=α0(t)sin(Ωt) of frequency Ω much larger than κ and amplitude α0 which is slowly varying in time, by a multiple-scale analysis one can remove the rapidly varying terms in Eq. (1) and obtain the reduced equations idandt=κe(t)(an+1+an1) with an effective slowly varying hopping amplitude κe=κJ0(α0Ω) [see, e. g., S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. B 73, 193305 (2006)]. A slow change of α0 leads to an adiabatic change of the bandwidth of the waveguide. Light slowing down and stopping in this case is thus analogous to adiabatic band compression of Ref. [1]. The requested modulation frequency Ω, however, turns out to be too high (larger than κ) to be reasonably achieved in practice.
  25. In deriving Eq. (A3) we assumed that the relation ωn=nα(t) holds even for n<1 and n>N, though in practice the dynamic tuning of cavity resonances is applied solely for the cavities with index n in the range 1<n<N (see Fig. 1). However, taking into account that α(t) vanishes outside the interval [t1,t2] and that the size N of the stopping box is large enough to fully contain the pulse during the delay interval—i.e., an(t)0 for n<1, n>N in the time interval t1<t<t2—the previous assumption does not change the solution of the problem.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation