Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nontwist non-Hamiltonian systems

E. G. Altmann*, G. Cristadoro, and D. Pazó

  • Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Nöthnitzer Straße 38, 01187 Dresden, Germany

  • *Electronic address: edugalt@pks.mpg.de
  • Electronic address: giampo@pks.mpg.de
  • Electronic address: pazo@pks.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. E 73, 056201 – Published 3 May, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.056201

Abstract

We show that the nontwist phenomena previously observed in Hamiltonian systems exist also in time-reversible non-Hamiltonian systems. In particular, we study the two standard collision-reconnection scenarios and we compute the parameter space breakup diagram of the shearless torus. Besides the Hamiltonian routes, the breakup may occur due to the onset of attractors. We study these phenomena in coupled phase oscillators and in non-area-preserving maps.

Article Text

References (31)

  1. J. A. G. Roberts and G. R. W. Quispel, Phys. Rep. 216, 63 (1992).
  2. A. Politi, G. L. Oppo, and R. Badii, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4055 (1986).
  3. K. Y. Tsang, R. E. Mirollo, S. H. Strogatz, and K. Wiesenfeld, Physica D 48, 102 (1991).
  4. K. Y. Tsang, S. H. Strogatz, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1094 (1991).
  5. D. Topaj and A. Pikovsky, Physica D 170, 118 (2002).
  6. V. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1978).
  7. J. E. Howard and S. M. Hohs, Phys. Rev. A 29, 418 (1984); J. E. Howard and J. Humpherys, Physica D 80, 256 (1995).
  8. D. del Castillo-Negrete, J. M. Greene, and P. J. Morrison, Physica D 91, 1 (1996).
  9. P. Morrison, Phys. Plasmas 7, 2279 (2000).
  10. R. Balescu, Phys. Rev. E 58, 3781 (1998); W. Horton et al., Phys. Plasmas 5, 3910 (1998); M. Roberto, E. C. da Silva, I. L. Caldas, and R. Viana, ibid. 11, 214 (2004).
  11. E. Petrisor, J. H. Misguich, and D. Constaniescu, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 18, 1085 (2003).
  12. D. del Castillo-Negrete and P. J. Morrison, Phys. Fluids A 5, 948 (1993).
  13. G. Corso and F. B. Rizzato, Phys. Rev. E 58, 8013 (1998).
  14. A. Wurm, A. Apte, K. Fuchss, and P. Morrison, Chaos 15, 023108 (2005).
  15. D. del Castillo-Negrete, J. M. Greene, and P. J. Morrison, Physica D 100, 311 (1997).
  16. S. Shinohara and Y. Aizawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 97, 379 (1997); 100, 219 (1998).
  17. S. Saitô, Y. Nomura, K. Hirose, and Y. Ichikawa, Chaos 7, 245 (1997).
  18. E. Shuckburgh and P. Haynes, Phys. Fluids 15, 3342 (2003).
  19. G. Stagika and S. Ichtiaroglou, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 78, 151 (2000).
  20. M. B. Sevryuk, Physica D 112, 132 (1998).
  21. N. Slater, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 63, 1115 (1967).
  22. A. Apte, A. Wurm, and P. Morrison, Chaos 13, 421 (2003).
  23. D. Gaidashev and H. Koch, Nonlinearity 17, 1713 (2004).
  24. P. Rosenau and A. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 174102 (2005).
  25. O. V. Popovych, Y. L. Maistrenko, and P. A. Tass, Phys. Rev. E 71, 065201 (2005).
  26. A. Apte, R. de la Llave, and N. Petrov, Nonlinearity 18, 1173 (2005).
  27. Actually, the reconnection will not occur exactly in a line in the two-parameter space but in a (very) thin region as discussed by A. Apte, R. de la Llave, and E. Petrisor, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 27, 1115 (2006).
  28. A. Pikovsky (private communication).
  29. The shearless torus near criticality is strongly meandering and some care in the choice of the recurrence region has to be taken in order to avoid the torus multiply crossing it.

  30. A dissipative analogous of these reconnections switches the basins of attraction of two stable foci. See, e.g., J. P. Van der Weele and T. P. Valkering, Physica A 169 42 (1990); S. M. Soskin et al., Phys. Rep. 373 247 (2003).
  31. Examples of nontwist singularities for high-dimensional sympletic maps are extensively studied in H. R. Dullin and J. D. Meiss, Chaos 13 1 (2003).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation