Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Corrections to scaling in multicomponent polymer solutions

Andrea Pelissetto*

Ettore Vicari

  • Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN—Sezione di Roma I, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza,” Piazzale Moro 2, I-00185 Roma, Italy

  • Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN—Sezione di Pisa, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 2, I-56127 Pisa, Italy

  • *Electronic address: andrea.pelissetto@roma1.infn.it
  • Electronic address: ettore.vicari@df.unipi.it

Phys. Rev. E 73, 051802 – Published 17 May, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.051802

Abstract

We calculate the correction-to-scaling exponent ωT that characterizes the approach to the scaling limit in multicomponent polymer solutions. A direct Monte Carlo determination of ωT in a system of interacting self-avoiding walks gives ωT=0.415±0.020. A field-theory analysis based on five- and six-loop perturbative series leads to ωT=0.41±0.04. We also verify the renormalization-group predictions for the scaling behavior close to the ideal-mixing point.

Article Text

References (32)

  1. P. G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1979).
  2. K. F. Freed, Renormalization Group Theory of Macromolecules (Wiley, New York, 1987).
  3. L. Schäfer, Excluded Volume Effects in Polymer Solutions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).
  4. J.-F. Joanny, L. Leibler, and R. Ball, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 4640 (1984).
  5. L. Schäfer and C. Kappeler, J. Phys. (France) 46, 1853 (1985).
  6. L. Schäfer, U. Lehr, and C. Kappeler, J. Phys. I 1, 211 (1991).
  7. P. Belohorec and B. G. Nickel, Guelph University report (unpublished).
  8. At present the most accurate estimates of ν are ν=0.58758±0.00007 (Ref. [7]), ν=0.5874±0.0002 [T. Prellberg, J. Phys. A 34, L599 (2001)], ν=0.58765±0.00020 [H.-P. Hsu, W. Nadler, and P. Grassberger, Macromolecules 37, 4658 (2004)]. For an extensive list of results, see A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Phys. Rep. 368, 549 (2002).
  9. D. Broseta, L. Leibler, and J.-F. Joanny, Macromolecules 20, 1935 (1987).
  10. P. Calabrese, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 67, 054505 (2003).
  11. H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde, Phys. Lett. B 342, 284 (1995).
  12. J. M. Carmona, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15136 (2000).
  13. J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 95 (1977); Phys. Rev. B 21, 3976 (1980).
  14. B. G. Nickel, Physica A 177, 189 (1991).
  15. S. Caracciolo, M. S. Causo, and A. Pelissetto, Phys. Rev. E 57, R1215 (1998).
  16. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Nucl. Phys. B 519, 626 (1998).
  17. R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, J. Phys. A 31, 8103 (1998).
  18. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Nucl. Phys. B 575, 579 (2000).
  19. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, 3rd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996).
  20. P. Calabrese and P. Parruccini, Phys. Rev. B 71, 064416 (2005).
  21. A. D. Sokal, Europhys. Lett. 27, 661 (1994); 30, 123(E) (1995).
  22. P. Grassberger and R. Hegger, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 6881 (1995); P. Grassberger, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3682 (1997).
  23. We quote here some additional, less precise estimates of βθ: βθ=0.274±0.006 [H. Meirovitch and H. A. Lim, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2544 (1989)] and βθ=0.276±0.006 [M. C. Tesi, E. J. J. van Rensburg, E. Orlandini, and S. G. Whittington, J. Stat. Phys. 82, 155 (1996)].
  24. M. Lal, Mol. Phys. 17, 57 (1969).
  25. B. MacDonald, N. Jan, D. L. Hunter, and M. O. Steinitz, J. Phys. A 18, 2627 (1985).
  26. N. Madras and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys. 50, 109 (1988).
  27. A. D. Sokal, in Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science, edited by K. Binder (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
  28. T. Kennedy, J. Stat. Phys. 106, 407 (2002).
  29. B. Li, N. Madras, and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys. 80, 661 (1995).
  30. P. G. de Gennes, talk given at the Yeshiva meeting on statistical mechanics, Fall 1980; cited in Ref. [6].
  31. A precise estimate of ωωT can be obtained by writing it as ω2ζ. Using the estimate of Ref. [7] for ω and the estimate of ζ reported in Sec. II we find ωωT=0.447±0.025.

  32. These considerations do not apply to the Widom-Rowlinson model of diblock copolymers considered in C. I. Addison, J. P. Hansen, V. Krakoviack, and A. A. Louis, Mol. Phys. 103, 3045 (2005), since the two polymers are ideal. In this case scaling corrections are controlled by exponent ωS, whose ϵ expansion is ωS=ϵ12ϵ2+1.15154ϵ34.20439ϵ4+16.9338ϵ5+O(ϵ6). A Padé-Borel resummation gives ωS=0.77±0.02. A three-loop analysis gives ωS0.82 (Ref. [6]).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation