Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Epidemic spreading and cooperation dynamics on homogeneous small-world networks

F. C. Santos1,2, J. F. Rodrigues2, and J. M. Pacheco3,2

  • 1IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt 50, Belgium
  • 2GADGET, Apartado 1329, 1009-001 Lisboa, Portugal
  • 3Centro de Física Teórica e Computacional and Departamento de Física da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidad de Lisboa, P-1649-003 Lisboa Codex, Portugal

Phys. Rev. E 72, 056128 – Published 23 November, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056128

Abstract

We introduce a class of small-world networks—homogeneous small-worlds—which, in contrast with the well-known Watts-Strogatz small-worlds, exhibit a homogeneous connectivity distribution, in the sense that all nodes have the same number of connections. This feature allows the investigation of pure small-world effects, detached from any associated heterogeneity. Furthermore, we use at profit the remarkable similarity between the properties of homogeneous small worlds and the heterogeneous small-worlds of Watts-Strogatz to assess the separate roles of heterogeneity and small-world effects. We investigate the dependence on these two mechanisms of the threshold for epidemic outbreaks and also of the coevolution of cooperators and defectors under natural selection. With respect to the well-studied regular homogeneous limits, we find a subtle interplay between these mechanisms. While they both contribute to reduce the threshold for an epidemic outburst, they exhibit opposite behavior in the evolution of cooperation, such that the overall results mask the true nature of their individual contribution to this process.

Article Text

References (23)

  1. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
  2. S. N. Dorogotsev and J. F. F. Mendes, Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
  3. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998).
  4. G. Szabó and J. Vukov, Phys. Rev. E 69, 036107 (2004).
  5. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3200 (2001).
  6. R. M. May and A. L. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. E 64, 066112 (2001).
  7. S. Maslov and K. Sneppen, Science 296, 910 (2002).
  8. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, Nature (London) 359, 826 (1992).
  9. M. A. Nowak, S. Bonhoeffer, and R. M. May, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 4877 (1994).
  10. K. Pakdaman and D. Mestivier, Phys. Rev. E 64, 030901(R) (2001).
  11. M. H. Vainstein and J. J. Arenzon, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051905 (2001).
  12. P. Holme, A. Trusina, B. J. Kim, and P. Minnhagen, Phys. Rev. E 68, 030901(R) (2003).
  13. J. M. Pacheco and F. C. Santos, in Science of Complex Networks: From Biology to the Internet and WWW, edited by J. F. F. Mendes, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 776 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2005), p. 90.
  14. O. Durán and R. Mulet, Physica D 208, 257 (2005).
  15. F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 098104 (2005).
  16. A. Fronczak, P. Fronczak, and J. A. Holyst, Phys. Rev. E 70, 056110 (2004).
  17. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066117 (2001).
  18. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, edited by P. Hammerstein (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003).
  19. H. Gintis, Game Theory Evolving (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).
  20. B. J. Kim, A. Trusina, P. Holme, P. Minnhagen, J. S. Chung, and M. Y. Choi, Phys. Rev. E 66, 021907 (2002).
  21. G. Szabó and C. Hauert, Phys. Rev. E 66, 062903 (2002).
  22. A. Szolnoki and G. Szabó, Phys. Rev. E 70, 037102 (2004).
  23. A. Traulsen, J. Claussen, and C. Hauert, e-print cond-mat/0409655.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation