- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Orientational correlations and the effect of spatial gradients in the equilibrium steady state of hard rods in two dimensions: A study using deposition-evaporation kinetics

Mahendra D. Khandkar and Mustansir Barma

  • Department of Theoretical Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005, India

PDF

Phys. Rev. E 72, 051717 – Published 28 November, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.051717

Abstract

Deposition and evaporation of infinitely thin hard rods (needles) is studied in two dimensions using Monte Carlo simulations. The ratio of deposition to evaporation rates controls the equilibrium density of rods, and increasing it leads to an entropy-driven transition to a nematic phase in which both static and dynamical orientational correlation functions decay as power laws, with exponents varying continuously with deposition-evaporation rate ratio. Our results for the onset of the power-law phase agree with those for a conserved number of rods. At a coarse-grained level, the dynamics of the nonconserved angle field is described by the Edwards-Wilkinson equation. Predicted relations between the exponents of the quadrupolar and octupolar correlation functions are borne out by our numerical results. We explore the effects of spatial inhomogeneity in the deposition-evaporation ratio by simulations, entropy-based arguments, and a study of the additional terms introduced in the free energy. The primary effect is that needles tend to align along the local spatial gradient of the ratio. A uniform gradient thus induces a uniformly aligned state, as does a gradient which varies randomly in magnitude and sign, but acts only in one direction. Random variations of deposition-evaporation rates in both directions induce frustration, resulting in a state with glassy characteristics.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (29)

  1. S. Fraden et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2068 (1989).
  2. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1993).
  3. M. F. Islam et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 088303 (2004).
  4. J. A. Cuesta and D. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. A 42, 2126 (1990).
  5. A. Stroobants, H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, and D. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2929 (1987).
  6. M. A. Bates and D. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 10034 (2000).
  7. M. C. Lagomarsino, M. Dogterom, and M. Dijkstra, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 3535 (2003).
  8. D. Frenkel and R. Eppenga, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1776 (1985).
  9. J. W. Evans, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1281 (1993).
  10. E. Frey and A. Vilfan, Chem. Phys. 284, 287 (2002).
  11. V. Narayan, N. Menon, and S. Ramaswamy cond-mat/0510082 (unpublished).
  12. R. B. Stinchcombe, M. D. Grynberg, and M. Barma, Phys. Rev. E 47, 4018 (1993).
  13. P. L. Krapivsky and E. Ben-Naim, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6778 (1994).
  14. A. J. Kolan, E. R. Nowak, and A. V. Tkachenko, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3094 (1999).
  15. P. R. Van Tassel et al., J. Chem. Phys. 112, 1483 (2000).
  16. J. Talbot, G. Tarjus, and P. Viot, Phys. Rev. E 61, 5429 (2000).
  17. Lj. Budinski-Petkovic and U. Kozmidis-Lubiric, Physica A 301, 174 (2001).
  18. L. Onsager, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 627 (1949).
  19. J. P. Straley, Phys. Rev. A 4, 675 (1971).
  20. D. R. Nelson, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic London, 1983), Vol. 7.
  21. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000), Sec. 6.1.3.
  22. K. Binder, in Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics: An Introduction, edited by K. Binder and D. W. Heermann (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

  23. For instance, for Ising-like systems, for T>Tc and L⪢ξ, PL(s) approaches a Gaussian distribution, while for T<Tc and L⪢ξ, PL(s) approaches two Gaussians centered at ±M0 where ξ denotes the correlation length and M0 is the spontaneous magnetization of infinite system. At criticality, PL(s) approaches a scaled universal form for large L [22]. Note that s denotes the order parameter corresponding to Ising-like systems.

  24. H. Weber, D. Marx, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14636 (1995).
  25. S. F. Edwards and D. R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 381, 17 (1982).
  26. K. Binder, in Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).
  27. Y.-K. Yu, P. L. Taylor, and E. M. Terentjev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 128 (1998).

  28. We are grateful to Yashodhan Hatwalne, Gautam Menon, and Sriram Ramaswamy for very useful inputs on this section.

  29. The form of these terms is the same as those describing the coupling of a flexoelectric nematic to the electric field; see Sec. 3.3.2 of Ref. [2]. In our case, the external field is ∇κ.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 72, 051717– Published 28 November, 2005
  • Received 25 January 2005

© 2005 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation