Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Chaos synchronization in gap-junction-coupled neurons

Masahiko Yoshioka*

  • Brain Science Institute, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan

  • *Electronic address: myosioka@brain.riken.go.jp

Phys. Rev. E 71, 065203(R) – Published 28 June, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.065203

Abstract

Depending on temperature, the modified Hodgkin-Huxley (MHH) equations exhibit a variety of dynamical behaviors, including intrinsic chaotic firing. We analyze synchronization in a large ensemble of MHH neurons that are interconnected with gap junctions. By evaluating tangential Lyapunov exponents we clarify whether the synchronous state of neurons is chaotic or periodic. Then, we evaluate transversal Lyapunov exponents to elucidate if this synchronous state is stable against infinitesimal perturbations. Our analysis elucidates that with weak gap junctions, the stability of the synchronization of MHH neurons shows rather complicated changes with temperature. We, however, find that with strong gap junctions, the synchronous state is stable over the wide range of temperature irrespective of whether synchronous state is chaotic or periodic. It turns out that strong gap junctions realize the robust synchronization mechanism, which well explains synchronization in interneurons in the real nervous system.

Article Text

References (23)

  1. G. Buzsáki, Z. Horváth, R. Urioste, J. Hetke, and K. Wise, Science 256, 1025 (1992).
  2. X. J. Wang and J. Rinzel, J. Neurosci. 16, 6402 (1996).
  3. D. Golomb and J. Rinzel, Phys. Rev. E 48, 4810 (1993).
  4. M. A. Whittington, R. D. Traub, and J. G. R. Jeffreys, Nature (London) 373, 612 (1995).
  5. X. J. Wang and G. Buzáki, J. Neurosci. 16, 6402 (1996).
  6. C. C. Chow, J. A. White, J. Ritt, and N. Kopell, J. Comput. Neurosci. 5, 407 (1998).
  7. P. H. E. Tiesinga and J. V. Jose, Network 11, 1 (2000).
  8. M. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. E 71, 061914 (2005).
  9. G. Ermentrout and N. Kopell, J. Math. Biol. 29, 195 (1991).
  10. D. Hansel, G. Mato, and C. Meunier, Neural Comput. 7, 307 (1995).
  11. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
  12. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983).
  13. K. Kaneko, Physica D 77, 456 (1994).
  14. Y. Maistrenko and T. Kapitaniak, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3285 (1996).
  15. A. Pikovsky, O. Popovych, and Yu. Maistrenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 044102 (2001).
  16. H. A. Braun, M. T. Huber, M. Dewald, K. Schäfer, and K. Voigt, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 8, 881 (1998).
  17. U. Feudel, A. Neiman, X. Pei, W. Wojtenek, H. Braun, M. Huber, and F. Moss, Chaos 10, 231 (2000). According to this paper we assume the four-dimensional MMH equations of the form v̇=(IlIdIrIsdIsr)c, Il=gl(vvl), Id=ρgdαd(vvd), αd=(1+exp[sd(vv0d)])1, Ir=ρgrαr(vvr), ẇ1=α̇r=ϕ(αrαr)τr, αr={1+exp[sr(vv0r)]}1, Isd=ρgsdαsd(vvsd), ẇ2=α̇sd=ϕ(αsdαsd)τsd, αsd={1+exp[ssd(vv0sd)]}1, Isr=ρgsrαsr(vvsr), ẇ3=α̇sr=ϕ(ηIsrθαsr)τsr with temperature-dependent scaling factors ρ=A1(TT0)10 and ϕ=A2(TT0)10. The parameters values are c=1, vl=60, vd=vsd=50, vr=vsr=90, gl=0.1, gd=1.5, gr=2.0, gsd=0.25, gsr=0.4, τr=2.0, τsd=10, τsr=20, v0d=25, v0r=25, v0sd=40, sd=0.25, sr=0.25, ssd=0.09, η=0.012, θ=0.17, A1=1.3, A2=3.0, T0=25.
  18. I. Shimada and T. Nagashima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 61, 1605 (1979).
  19. J. Milnor, Commun. Math. Phys. 99, 117 (1985).
  20. M. Whittington and R. D. Traub, Trends Neurosci. 26, 676 (2003).
  21. M. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. E 66, 061913 (2002).
  22. D. H. Perkel, B. Mulloney, and R. W. Budelli, Neuroscience 6, 823 (1981).
  23. N. Kopell, G. B. Ermentrout, M. A. Whittington, and R. D. Traub, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1867 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation