- Access by Xinjiang University
Statistics of loop formation along double helix DNAs
Phys. Rev. E 71, 061905 – Published 13 June, 2005Erratum Phys. Rev. E 72, 059901 (2005)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061905
Abstract
We compute relative position distributions of distant sites along discretized semiflexible polymers, focusing on encounter statistics for pairs of sites along a double-stranded DNA molecule (dsDNA), using a transfer-matrix approach. We generalize the usual semiflexible polymer, considering nonlinear elasticity effects arising from inhomogeneities which either appear at any position via thermal fluctuation, or which occur at specific “quenched” locations. We apply our theory to two problems associated with dsDNA looping. First, we discuss how local flexible defects in double-helix structure facilitate cyclization of short dsDNA molecules. Flexible defects greatly enhance cyclization rate, and strongly modify its dependence on the closure orientational boundary condition. This effect is relevant to free-solution cyclization experiments, and to loop formation in vivo. Second, we present calculations of force dependence of the probability of formation of loops along single dsDNAs which show how the probability of loop formation is suppressed by tension.
Erratum
Erratum: Statistics of loop formation along double helix DNAs [Phys. Rev. E 71, 061905 (2005)]
Article Text
References (49)
- J. Dekker, Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 277 (2003).
- K. Rippe, P. H. von Hippel, and J. Langowski, Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 500 (1995).
- S. Oehler, M. Amouyal, P. Kolkhof, B. Wilcken-Bergmann, and B. Muller-Hill, EMBO J. 13, 3348 (1994).
- Y. Chen, and P. A. Rice, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32, 135 (2003).
- B. M. Weiner, and N. Kleckner, Cell 77, 977 (1994).
- W. F. Marshall, A. Straight, J. F. Marko, J. Swedlow, A. Dernburg, A. Belmont, A. W. Murray, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat, Curr. Biol. 7, 930 (1997).
- R. Scleif, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 199 (1992).
- S. E. Halford, A. J. Welsh, and M. D. Szczelkun, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 1 (2004).
- J. M. Vilar and S. Leibler, J. Mol. Biol. 331, 981 (2003).
- M. Geanacopoulos, G. Vasmatzis, V. B. Zhurkin, and S. Adhya, Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 432 (2001); S. Semsey, M. Y. Tolstorukov, K. Virnik, V. B. Zhurkin, and S. Adhya, Genes Dev. 18 1898 (2004).
- V. L. Brandt and D. B. Roth, Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14, 224 (2002).
- T. J. Richmond and C. A. Davey, Nature (London) 423, 145 (2003).
- B. M. Ali, R. Amit, I. Braslavsky, A. B. Oppenhein, O. Gileadi, and J. Stavans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 10658 (2001).
- R. Amit, A. B. Oppenheim, and J. Stavans, Biophys. J. 84, 2467 (2003).
- J. van Noort, S. Vebrugge, N. Goosen, C. Dekker, and R. T. Dame, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 6969 (2004).
- D. Skoko, B. Wong, R. C. Johnson, and J. F. Marko, Biochemistry 43, 13867 (2004).
- L. Finzi and J. Gelles, Science 267, 378 (1995).
- G. Lia, D. Bensimon, V. Croquette, J. F. Allemand, D. Dunlap, D. E. Lewis, S. Adhya, and L. Finzi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 11373 (2003).
- J. Yan, D. Skoko, and J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. E 70, 011905 (2004).
- C. Bustamante, S. B. Smith, J. Liphardt, and D. Smith, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 279 (2000).
- J. Liphardt, B. Onoa, S. B. Smith, I. J. R. Tinoco, and C. Bustamante, Science 292, 733 (2002).
- D. Shore, J. Langowski, and R. L. Baldwin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 4833 (1981).
- P. J. Hagerman, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17, 265 (1988).
- Y. Zhang and D. M. Crothers, Biophys. J. 84, 136 (2003).
- Y. Zhang and D. M. Crothers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 3161 (2003).
- H. Arthanari, K. Wojtuszewski, I. Mukerji, and P. H. Bolton, Biophys. J. 86, 1625 (2004).
- T. E. Cloutier and J. Widom, Mol. Cell 14, 355 (2004).
- H. Yamakawa and W. H. Stockmayer, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 2843 (1972).
- J. Shimada and H. Yamakawa, Macromolecules 17, 689 (1984).
- A. Podtelezhnikov and A. Vologodskii, Macromolecules 30, 6668 (1997).
- J. Yan and J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 108108 (2004).
- P. A. Wiggins, R. Phillips, and P. C. Nelson Phys. Rev. E 71, 021909 (2005).
- J. Yan and J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. E 68, 011905 (2003).
- M. D. Wang, M. J. Schnitzer, H. Yin, R. Landick, J. Gelles, and S. M. Block, Science 282, 902 (1998).
- Eric W. Weisstein, “Wigner 3j-Symbol,” from MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Wigner3j-Symbol.html. The usage of spherical harmonics and Wigner-3J symbols is important for the computation in this paper. It allows us to get analytical expressions of the matrix elements, which is key to our semianalytical calculation of the problem. The analytical matrix expression also contributes to speeding up the computation.
- T. Strick, J. Allemand, V. Croquette, and D. Bensimon, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 74, 115 (2000).
- S. B. Smith, Y. Cui, and C. Bustamante, Science 271, 795 (1996).
- C. Storm and P. C. Nelson, Phys. Rev. E 67, 051906 (2003).
- M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, Theory of Polymer Dynamics (New York, Oxford, 1985).
- J. Santalucia, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 1460 (1998).
- D. H. Matthews, J. Sabina, M. Zuker, and D. H. Turner, J. Mol. Biol. 288, 911 (1999), see Table 17.
- S. Cocco, J. Yan, J.-F. Léger, D. Chatenay, and J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. E 70, 011910 (2004).
- J. F. Marko and E. D. Siggia, Phys. Rev. E 52, 2912 (1995).
- J. F. Marko and E. D. Siggia, Biophys. J. 73, 2173 (1997).
- S. Sankararaman and J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. E 71, 021911 (2005).
- P. Ranjith, P. B. Sunil Kumar, and G. I. Menon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 138102 (2005).
- D. M. Crothers, T. E. Haran, and J. G. Nadeau, J. Biol. Chem. 265, 7093 (1990).
- A. J. Spakowitz and Z. G. Wang, Macromolecules 37, 5814 (2004).
- L. Dai and F. Liu, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 8124 (2003).