- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Equilibrium bundle size of rodlike polyelectrolytes with counterion-induced attractive interactions
Phys. Rev. E 71, 060801(R) – Published 20 June, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.060801
Abstract
Multivalent counterions can induce an effective attraction between like-charged rodlike polyelectrolytes, leading to the formation of polelectrolyte bundles. In this paper, we calculate the equilibrium bundle size using a simple model in which the attraction between polyelectrolytes (assumed to be pairwise additive) is treated phenomenologically. If the counterions are pointlike, they almost completely neutralize the charge of the bundle, and the equilibrium bundle size diverges. When the counterions are large, however, steric and short-range electrostatic interactions prevent charge neutralization of the bundle, thus forcing the equilibrium bundle size to be finite. We also show that if the attractive interactions between the rods become frustrated as the bundle grows, finite-size bundles can be obtained with pointlike counterions.
Article Text
References (30)
- J. E. Sader and D. Y. C. Chan, Langmuir 16, 324 (2000).
- V. A. Bloomfield, Biopolymers 44, 269 (1997), and references therein.
- N. V. Hud and K. H. Downing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14925 (2001); C. C. Conwell, I. D. Vilfan, and N. V. Hud, ibid. 100, 9296 (2003).
- J. X. Tang, S. Wong, P. T. Tran, and P. A. Janmey, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 100, 796 (1996).
- T. E. Angelini, H. Liang, W. Wriggers, and G. C. L. Wong, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8634 (2003).
- D. J. Needleman, M. A. Ojeda-Lopez, U. Raviv, H. P. Miller, L. Wilson, and C. R. Safinya, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16099 (2004).
- J. X. Tang, P. A. Janmey, A. Lyubartsev, and L. Nordenskiöld, Biophys. J. 83, 566 (2002).
- N. Grønbech-Jensen, R. J. Mashl, R. F. Bruinsma, and W. M. Gelbart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2477 (1997).
- M. J. Stevens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 101 (1999).
- M. Deserno, A. Arnold, and C. Holm, Macromolecules 36, 249 (2003).
- L. Guldbrand, L. G. Nilsson, and L. Nordenskiöld, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6686 (1986).
- L. Nordensikiöld and A. Lyubartsev, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 10373 (1995).
- E. Allahyarov, G. Gompper, and H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. E 69, 041904 (2004).
- F. Oosawa, Biopolymers 6, 1633 (1968).
- B.-Y. Ha and A. J. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1289 (1997).
- I. Rouzina and V. A. Bloomfield, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 9977 (1996).
- B. I. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3268 (1999).
- F. J. Solis and M. O. de la Cruz, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4496 (1999).
- A. Naji and R. R. Netz, Eur. Phys. J. E 13, 43 (2004).
- R. Podgornik and V. A. Parsegian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1560 (1998).
- B.-Y. Ha and A. J. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1011 (1998); Europhys. Lett. 46, 624 (1999).
- C. Huang and M. O. de la Cruz, Macromolecules 35, 976 (2002).
- M. L. Henle and P. A. Pincus (unpublished).
- G. S. Manning, Q. Rev. Biophys. 7, 179 (1969).
- R. Kjellander, in Electrostatic Effects in Soft Matter and Biology, edited by C. Holm, P. Kékicheff, and R. Podgornik (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001).
- M. N. Tamashiro and H. Schiessel, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 1855 (2003); Phys. Rev. E 68, 066106 (2003).
- Lord Rayleigh, Philos. Mag. 14, 184 (1882).
- M. Deserno, Eur. Phys. J. E 6, 163 (2001).
- M. Rubinstein and A. V. Dobrynin, Macromolecules 34, 1964 (2001).
- D. J. Needleman (private communication).