Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Segregation mechanisms in a numerical model of a binary granular mixture

George C. M. A. Ehrhardt* and Andrew Stephenson

Pedro M. Reis

  • Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

  • Manchester Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

  • *Presently at The Abdus Salam ICTP, Strada Costiera 11, 34014 Trieste, Italy. Electronic address: gehrhard@ictp.trieste.it

Phys. Rev. E 71, 041301 – Published 1 April, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041301

Abstract

A simple phenomenological numerical model of a binary granular mixture is developed and investigated numerically. We attempt to model a recently reported experimental system where a horizontally vibrated binary monolayer was found to exhibit a transition from a mixed to a segregated state as the filling fraction of the mixture was increased. This numerical model is found to reproduce much of the experimentally observed behavior, most importantly the transition from the mixed to the segregated state. We use the numerical model to investigate granular segregation mechanisms and explain the experimentally observed behavior.

Article Text

References (26)

  1. T. Mullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4741 (2000).
  2. J. M. Ottino, D. V. Khakhar, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32 55 (2000).
  3. H. A. Makse, P. Cizeau, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3298 (1997).
  4. P. Cizeau, H. A. Makse, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 59, 4408 (1999).
  5. S. Shoichi, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 12, 115 (1998).
  6. P. M. Reis, G. C. M. A. Ehrhardt, A. Stephenson, and T. Mullin, cond-mat/0312331 (2003).
  7. P. M. Reis and T. Mullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 244301 (2002).
  8. The two-dimensional projected areas of the particles follow to a reasonable approximation a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 17% of the mean.

  9. H. M. Jaeger, S. R. Nagel, and R. P. Behringer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1259 (1996).
  10. An interesting example of a macroscopic system described by near-equilibrium statistic mechanics is given in R. P. Ojha, P.-A. Lemleux, P. K. Dixon, A. J. Liu, and D. J. Durian, Nature (London) 427, 521 (2004).
  11. J. Dzubiella, G. P. Hoffmann, and H. Lowen, Phys. Rev. E 65, 021402 (2002).
  12. P. Biswas, P. Sanchez, M. R. Swift, and P. J. King, Phys. Rev. E 68, 050301(R) (2003).
  13. N. Burtally, P. King, and M. Swift, Science 295, 1877 (2002).
  14. R. Cafiero, S. Luding, and H. J. Herrmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6014 (2000).
  15. H. J. Herrmann and S. Luding, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 10, 189 (1998). D. C. Rappaport, The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulations (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1995).
  16. 2500 ps were measured to calculate the mean radius.

  17. In the uncommon event that the particles are no longer moving together after the velocity update, they are not collided.

  18. S. McNamara and W. R. Young, Phys. Rev. E 50, R28 (1994).
  19. S. Luding and S. McNamara, Granular Matter 1, 113 (1998); cond-mat/9810009.
  20. A. Okabe, B. Boots, and K. Sugihara, Spacial Tesselations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams (Wiley, New York, 1992).
  21. P. M. Reis, G. C. M. A. Ehrhardt, and T. Mullin, cond-mat/0312330 (2003).
  22. S. Asakura and F. Oosawa, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1255 (1954). J. Polym. Sci. 33, 183 (1958).
  23. D. Frenkel, Physica A 313, 1 (2003).
  24. L. Lafuente and J. A. Cuesta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 145701 (2002); M. Dijkstra, R. Roij, and R. Evans, ibid. 82, 117 (1999).
  25. A. D. Dinsmore, A. G. Yodh, and D. J. Pine, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4045 (1995).
  26. C. M. Pooley and J. M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 118001 (2004).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation