Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nonlinear rupture of thin liquid films on solid surfaces

A. M. Leshansky1,* and B. Y. Rubinstein2

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-IIT Haifa, 32000, Israel
  • 2Department of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA

  • *Electronic address: lisha@tx.technion.ac.il

Phys. Rev. E 71, 040601(R) – Published 5 April, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.040601

Abstract

In this letter we investigate the rupture instability of thin liquid films by means of a bifurcation analysis in the vicinity of the short-scale instability threshold. The rupture time estimate obtained in closed form as a function of the relevant dimensionless groups is in striking agreement with the results of the numerical simulations of the original nonlinear evolution equations. This suggests that the weakly nonlinear theory adequately captures the underlying physics of the instability. When antagonistic (attractive/repulsive) molecular forces are considered, nonlinear saturation of the instability becomes possible. We show that the stability boundaries are determined by the van der Waals potential alone.

Article Text

References (17)

  1. B. V. Deryagin, Colloid J. USSR 10, 25 (1955); A. Sheludko, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1, 391 (1967).
  2. A. Vrij, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 42, 43 (1966); E. Ruckenstein and R. K. Jain, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 42, 23 (1974).
  3. J. T. G. Overbeek, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 1178 (1960).
  4. M. B. Williams and S. H. Davis, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 90, 220 (1982).
  5. A. Oron, S. H. Davis, and S. G. Bankoff, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 931 (1997).
  6. J. P. Burelbach, S. G. Bankoff, and S. H. Davis, J. Fluid Mech. 195, 463 (1988); R. V. Craster and O. K. Matar, ibid. 425, 235 (2000).
  7. A. De Wit, D. Gallez, and C. I. Christov, Phys. Fluids 6, 3256 (1994); O. E. Jensen and J. B. Grotberg, J. Fluid Mech. 240, 259 (1992).
  8. T. Erneux and S. H. Davis, Phys. Fluids A 5, 1117 (1993).
  9. B. Y. Rubinstein and A. M. Leshansky, Langmuir 16, 2049 (2000); B. Y. Rubinstein and S. G. Bankoff, ibid. 17, 1306 (2001).
  10. Y. L. Zhang, R. V. Craster, and O. K. Matar, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264, 160 (2003).
  11. R. Konnur, K. Kargupta, and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 931 (2000); A. Sharma, Eur. Phys. J. E 12, 397 (2003).
  12. K. Kargupta and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4536 (2001).
  13. G. Becker, G. Grün, R. Seemann, H. Mantz, K. Jacobs, K. R. Merke, and R. Blossey, Nat. Mater. 2, 59 (2003).
  14. R. Seemann, S. Herminghaus, and K. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5534 (2001).
  15. B. Y. Rubinstein and L. M. Pismen, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 983 (1999).
  16. Reprinted from Y. L. Zhang, R. V. Craster, and O. K. Matar, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264, 167 (2003), with permission from Elsevier.
  17. The Galerkin method can be applied for derivation of the amplitude equation for the “most dangerous” linear mode. The resulting amplitude equation is the same as Eq. (3) with α given by the linear stability and κ that differs from the near-critical expression Eq. (4). The preliminary analysis shows that in case with no surfactant, the nonlinear rupture time estimate is in excellent agreement with results of numerical simulations [10] for the same value of the initial amplitude A0. The theory of the nonlinear rupture far from the instability threshold is a subject of a separate paper.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation