Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Mesoscopic fluctuations of the Loschmidt echo

Cyril Petitjean and Philippe Jacquod

  • Département de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève, CH-1211 Genève 4, Switzerland

Phys. Rev. E 71, 036223 – Published 29 March, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036223

Abstract

We investigate the time-dependent variance of the fidelity with which an initial narrow wave packet is reconstructed after its dynamics is time reversed with a perturbed Hamiltonian. In the semiclassical regime of perturbation, we show that the variance first rises algebraically up to a critical time tc, after which it decays. To leading order in the effective Planck’s constant eff, this decay is given by the sum of a classical term exp[2λt], a quantum term 2effexp[Γt], and a mixed term 2exp[(Γ+λ)t]. Compared to the behavior of the average fidelity, this allows for the extraction of the classical Lyapunov exponent λ in a larger parameter range. Our results are confirmed by numerical simulations.

Article Text

References (29)

  1. F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
  2. R. Schack and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 525 (1993).
  3. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1610 (1984).
  4. R. A. Jalabert and H. M. Pastawski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2490 (2001).
  5. Ph. Jacquod, P. G. Silvestrov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. E 64, 055203(R) (2001).
  6. T. Prosen, T. H. Seligman, and M. Znidaric, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 150, 200 (2003).
  7. N. R. Cerruti and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 054103 (2002).
  8. F. M. Cucchietti, C. H. Lewenkopf, E. R. Mucciolo, H. M. Pastawski, and R. O. Vallejos, Phys. Rev. E 65, 046209 (2002).
  9. D. A. Wisniacki and D. Cohen, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046209 (2002).
  10. Ph. Jacquod and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3501 (1995).
  11. J. Vanicek and E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. E 68, 056208 (2003).
  12. Y. Adamov, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. E 67, 056217 (2003).
  13. Ph. Jacquod, İ. Adagideli, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Europhys. Lett. 61, 729 (2003).
  14. J. Emerson, Y. S. Weinstein, S. Lloyd, and D. G. Cory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 284102 (2002).
  15. Ph. Jacquod, İ. Adagideli, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 154103 (2002).
  16. A. Iomin, Phys. Rev. E 70, 026206 (2004).
  17. W. Wang, G. Casati, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. E 69, 025201(R) (2004).
  18. P. G. Silvestrov, J. Tworzydło, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. E 67, 025204(R) (2003).
  19. T. Gorin, T. Prosen, and T. H. Seligman, New J. Phys. 6, 20 (2004).
  20. This time t* is defined by ϵ0t*V(qs(t),t)=1 for a typical trajectory s.

  21. P. Cvitanović, R. Artuso, R. Mainieri, G. Tanner, and G. Vattay, Chaos: Classical and Quantum (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen 2003), www.ChaosBook.org
  22. See e.g., E. J. Heller and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Today 46(7), 38 (1993).
  23. Setting s=s for two trajectories generated by two different Hamiltonians H=H0+ϵV is justified by the structural stability of hyperbolic systems for not too large ϵ; see e.g., A. B. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996). In the context of the fidelity, this point was first mentioned in Ref. [11].
  24. P. Collet and J.-P. Eckmann, J. Stat. Phys. 115, 217 (2004).
  25. G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica A 91, 450 (1978); M. V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
  26. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic, New York, 1991).
  27. This time is very short, of the order of the inverse energy of the particle, i.e., O(effa), where a0 depends on the system dimension and the energy-momentum relation. For Ep2 and in two dimensions, one has a=1.

  28. C. Petitjean and Ph. Jacquod (unpublished).
  29. F. M. Izrailev, Phys. Rep. 196, 299 (1990).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation