Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electrical conductivity of aqueous solutions of aluminum salts

J. Vila1, E. Rilo1, L. Segade1, O. Cabeza1,*, and L. M. Varela2

  • 1Departamento de Física, Universidade da Coruña, Campus da Zapateira s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
  • 2Departamento de Física de la Materia Condensada, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

  • *FAX: +34 981 167065. Email address: oscabe@udc.es

Phys. Rev. E 71, 031201 – Published 17 March, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.031201

Abstract

We present experimental measurements of the specific electrical conductivity (σ) in aqueous solutions of aluminum salts at different temperatures, covering all salt concentrations from saturation to infinite dilution. The salts employed were AlCl3, AlBr3, AlI3, and Al(NO3)3, which present a 1:3 relationship between the electrical charges of anion and cation. In addition, we have measured the density in all ranges of concentrations of the four aqueous electrolyte solutions at 298.15K. The measured densities show an almost linear behavior with concentration, and we have fitted it to a second order polynomial with very high degree of approximation. The measurement of the specific conductivity at constant temperature reveals the existence of maxima in the conductivity vs concentration curves at molar concentrations around 1.5M for the three halide solutions studied, and at approximately 2M for the nitrate. We present a theoretical foundation for the existence of these maxima, based on the classical Debye-Hückel-Onsager hydrodynamic mean-field framework for electrical transport and its high concentration extensions, and also a brief consideration of ionic frictional coefficients using mode-coupling theory. We also found that the calculated values of the equivalent conductance vary in an approximately linear way with the square root of the concentration at concentrations as high as those where the maximum of σ appears. Finally, and for completeness, we have measured the temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity at selected concentrations from 283to353K, and performed a fit to an exponential equation of the Vogel-Fulcher-Tamman type. The values of the calculated temperatures of null mobility of the four salts are reported.

Article Text

References (39)

  1. T. Welton, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 99, 2071 (1999).
  2. W. Xu and C. A. Angell, Science 302, 422 (2003).
  3. P. Debye and E. Hückel, Phys. Z. 24, 185 (1923).
  4. L. Onsager and R. M. Fuoss, J. Phys. Chem. 36, 2689 (1932).
  5. H. S. Harned and B. B. Owen, The Physical Chemistry of Electrolyte Solutions, 3rd ed. (Reinhold, New York, 1958).
  6. R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes, Electrolyte Solutions (Butterworths, London, 1959).
  7. J. B. Hubbard, in The Physics and Chemistry of Aqueous Ionic Solutions, edited by M. C. Bellisent-Funel, NATO Advanced Studies Institute, Series B: Physics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987), pp. 95–128.
  8. J. O’M. Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry (Plenum, New York, 1998), Chap. 4.
  9. The DHO classical formalism for ionic conductance has also been referred to with various other names in the literature: Fuoss-Onsager formalism, Debye-Falkenhagen-Onsager formalism, etc., corresponding to different combinations of the names of the main researchers involved in its original derivation.

  10. P. Debye and H. Falkenhagen, Phys. Z. 29, 121 (1928).
  11. G. Joos and M. Blumentritt, Phys. Z. 28, 836 (1927).
  12. W. Ebeling and J. J. Rose, J. Solution Chem. 10, 599 (1981).
  13. W. Ebeling and M. J. Grigo, J. Solution Chem. 11, 151 (1982).
  14. O. Bernard, W. Kunz, P. Turq, and L. Blum, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3833 (1992).
  15. P. Turq, L. Blum, O. Bernard, and W. Kunz, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 822 (1995).
  16. S. Durand-Vidal, J. P. Simonin, P. Turq, and O. Bernard, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 6733 (1995).
  17. S. Durand-Vidal, P. Turq, O. Bernard, C. Treiner, and L. Blum, Physica A 231, 123 (1996).
  18. P. Attard, Phys. Rev. E 48, 3604 (1993).
  19. R. Kjellander and D. J. Mitchell, Chem. Phys. Lett. 200, 76 (1992).
  20. R. Kjellander and D. J. Mitchell, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 603 (1994).
  21. L. M. Varela, M. Pérez-Rodríguez, M. García, F. Sarmiento, and V. Mosquera, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1930 (1998).
  22. L. M. Varela, C. Rega, M. Pérez-Rodríguez, M. García, V. Mosquera, and F. Sarmiento, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4483 (1999).
  23. L. M. Varela, M. Pérez-Rodríguez, M. García, F. Sarmiento, and V. Mosquera, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10986 (1999).
  24. L. M. Varela, M. García, and V. Mosquera, Phys. Rep. 382, 1 (2003).
  25. J. Molénat, J. Chim. Phys. Phys.-Chim. Biol. 66, 825 (1969).
  26. R. C. Sharma, R. K. Jain, and H. C. Gaur, Electrochim. Acta 24, 139 (1979).
  27. P. Claes, Y. Loix, and J. Glibert, Electrochim. Acta 28, 421 (1983).
  28. G. Herlem, B. Fahys, M. Herlem, and J-F. Penneau, J. Solution Chem. 28, 223 (1999).
  29. S. Dev, D. Das, and K. Ismail, J. Chem. Eng. Data 49, 339 (2004).
  30. C. A. Angell and E. J. Sare, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 4713 (1968).
  31. C. A. Angell and E. J. Sare, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 1058 (1970).
  32. C. A. Angell, Aust. J. Chem. 23, 929 (1970).
  33. A. Chandra and B. Bagchi, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 10024 (1999).
  34. B. Bagchi, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 3989 (1998).
  35. O. Klug and B. A. Lopatin, New Developments in Conductimetric and Oscillometric Analysis (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988).
  36. M. Prego, E. Rilo, E. Carballo, C. Franjo, E. Jiménez, and O. Cabeza, J. Mol. Liq. 102, 83 (2003).
  37. J. Hamelin, T. K. Bose, and J. Thoen, Phys. Rev. A 42, 4735 (1990).
  38. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 80th ed. edited by David R. Lide (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1999).
  39. M. Videa, Wu Xu, B. Gell, R. Marzke, and C. A. Angell, J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, 1352 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation