- Access by Xinjiang University
Emergence of large-scale vorticity during diffusion in a random potential under an alternating bias
Phys. Rev. E 71, 026112 – Published 11 February, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.026112
Abstract
Conventional wisdom indicates that the presence of an alternating driving force will not change the long-term behavior of a Brownian particle moving in a random potential. Although this is true in one dimension, here we offer direct evidence that the inevitable local symmetry breaking present in a two-dimensional random potential leads to the emergence of a local ratchet effect that generates large-scale vorticity patterns consisting of steady-state net diffusive currents. For small fields the spatial correlation function of the current follows a logarithmic distance dependence, while for large external fields both the vorticity and the correlations gradually disappear. We uncover the scaling laws characterizing this unique pattern formation process, and discuss their potential relevance to real systems.
Article Text
References (12)
- T. Nattermann and J. Villain, Phase Transitions 11, 5 (1988).
- J. P. Hirth and J. Lothe, The Theory of Dislocations (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
- J. Nittmann, G. Daccord, and H. E. Stanley, Nature (London) 314, 141 (1985).
- L. F. Richardson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 110, 709 (1926).
- S. Alexander, J. Bernasconi, W. R. Schneider, and R. Orbach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 175 (1981); S. Havlin and D. Ben-Avraham, Adv. Phys. 36, 695 (1987); J.-P. Bouchaud and A. Georges, Phys. Rep. 195, 127 (1990); F. Cecconi, M. Marsili, J. R. Banavar, and A. Maritan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 088102 (2002); E. Lopez, S. V. Buldyrev, N. V. Dokholyan, L. Goldmakher, S. Havlin, P. R. King, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 67, 056314 (2003); J. S. Andrade, A. D. Araujo, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, 63, 051403 (2001); S. Ciliberti, G. Caldarelli, P. De los Rios, L. Pietronero, and Y. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4848 (2000).
- A. Ajdari and J. Prost, C.R. Acad. Sci., Ser. IIc: Chim 315, 1635 (1992); M. O. Magnasco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1477 (1993); R. D. Astumian and M. Bier, ibid. 72, 1766 (1994); R. D. Astumian, Science 276, 917 (1997); F. Jülicher, A. Ajdari, and J. Prost, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1269 (1997).
- B. Robertson and R. D. Astumian, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7414 (1991).
- K. W. Kehr, K. Mussawisade, T. Wichmann, and W. Dieterich, Phys. Rev. E 56, R2351 (1997).
- It must be emphasized that the numerical solution of Eqs. (1)–(3) for arbitrarily small values of and/or for arbitrarily large system sizes is not possible. This is due to the slow convergence of the conjugate gradient method in these limits and, most importantly, due to the growing impact of the randomization, induced by the numerical errors [M. A. Makeev, I. Derényi, and A.-L. Barabási (unpublished)].
- W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 1992).
- C.-S. Lee, B. Jankó, I. Derényi, and A.-L. Barabási, Nature (London) 400, 337 (1999); J. E. Villegas, S. Savelév, F. Nori, E. M. Gonzalez, J. V. Anguita, R. Garcia, and J. L. Vicent, Science 302, 1188 (2003); M. B. Hastings, C. J. Olson Reichhardt, and C. Reichhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 247004 (2003).
- K.-Q. Zhang and X. Y. Liu, Nature (London) 429, 739 (2004).