Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of self-injection on ultraintense laser wake-field acceleration

A. Zhidkov1, J. Koga2, K. Kinoshita1, and M. Uesaka1

  • 1Nuclear Engineering Research Laboratory, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 22-2 Shirane-shirakata, Tokai, Naka, Ibaraki 319-1188, Japan
  • 2Advanced Photon Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 8-1 Umemidai, Kizu-chou, Souraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0215, Japan

Phys. Rev. E 69, 035401(R) – Published 31 March, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.035401

Abstract

The self-injection of plasma electrons which have been accelerated to relativistic energies by a laser pulse moving with a group velocity less than the speed of light with Iλ2>5×1019Wμm2/cm2 is found via particle-in-cell simulation to be efficient for laser wake-field acceleration. When the matching condition a0>~(21/4ω/ωpl)2/3 is met, the self-injection, along with wave breaking, dominates monoenergetic electron acceleration yielding up to 100 MeV energies by a 100 TW, 20 fs laser pulse. In contrast to the injection due to wave-breaking processes, self-injection allows suppression of production of a Maxwell distribution of accelerated particles and the extraction of a beam-quality bunch of energetic electrons.

References (18)

  1. T. Tajima and J. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267 (1979).
  2. K. Nakajima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4428 (1995); ibid.F. Amiranoff et al., 81, 995 (1998); F. Dorchies et al., Phys. Plasmas 6, 2903 (1999).
  3. D. Umstadter et al., Science 273, 472 (1996); D. UmstadterPhys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2073 (1996).
  4. E. Esarey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2682 (1997); E. EsareyIEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 24, 252 (1996).
  5. M. Uesaka et al., Phys. Rev. E 50, 3068 (1994); M. UesakaRadiat. Phys. Chem. 60, 303 (2001); Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 455, 148 (2000).
  6. V. Malka et al., Phys. Plasmas 8, 2605 (2001); V. MalkaScience 298, 1600 (2002).
  7. S. V. Bulanov, V. I. Kirsanov, and A. S. Sakharov, JETP Lett. 53, 565 (1991).
  8. S. Bulanov, N. Naumova, F. Pegoraro, and J. Sakai, Phys. Rev. E 58, R5257 (1998).
  9. Y. Ueshima et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 445, 130 (2000).
  10. S. V. Bulanov et al., Phys. Fluids B 4, 1935 (1992).
  11. A. Pukhov and J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 74, 355 (2002).
  12. F. V. Hartemann et al., Phys. Rev. E 51, 4833 (1995).
  13. C. D. Decker and W. B. Mori, Phys. Rev. E 51, 1364 (1995).
  14. C. J. McKinstrie and E. A. Startsev, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2130 (1997).
  15. We assume that the length, de, of the electron cloud generated at the front of the pulse is such that ded.
  16. C. K. Birdsall and A. B. Langdon, Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1992).
  17. R. G. Hemker et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 041301 (2002).
  18. The laser parameters are chosen close to those of the JAERI laser with the maximal power 0.85 PW; see M. Aoyama et al., Opt. Lett. 28, 1594 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation