Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Lattice Boltzmann simulations of contact line motion. I. Liquid-gas systems

A. J. Briant1, A. J. Wagner2, and J. M. Yeomans1

  • 1Department of Physics, Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Physics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105, USA

Phys. Rev. E 69, 031602 – Published 22 March, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.031602

Abstract

We investigate the applicability of a mesoscale modeling approach, lattice Boltzmann simulations, to the problem of contact line motion in one and two component, two phase fluids. In this, the first of two papers, we consider liquid-gas systems. Careful implementation of the thermodynamic boundary condition allows us to fix the static contact angle in the simulations. We then consider the behavior of a sheared interface. We show that the contact line singularity is overcome by evaporation or condensation near the contact line which is driven by the curvature of the diffuse interface. An analytic approximation is derived for the angular position of a sheared interface.

References (40)

  1. P.G. de Gennes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827 (1985).
  2. T. Young, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 95, 65 (1805).
  3. C. Huh and L.E. Scriven, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 35, 85 (1971).
  4. E.B. Dussan V. and S.H. Davis, J. Fluid Mech. 65, 71 (1974).
  5. E.B. Dussan V., J. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 371 (1979).
  6. L.M. Hocking, J. Fluid Mech. 79, 209 (1977).
  7. C. Huh and S.G. Mason, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 60, 11 (1977).
  8. L.M. Hocking and A.D. Rivers, J. Fluid Mech. 121, 425 (1982).
  9. R.G. Cox, J. Fluid Mech. 168, 169 (1986).
  10. C.G. Ngan and E.B. Dussan V., J. Fluid Mech. 209, 191 (1989).
  11. E.B. Dussan V., Ramé, and S. Garoff, J. Fluid Mech. 230, 97 (1991).
  12. J.A. Marsh, S. Garoff, and E.B. Dussan V., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2778 (1993).
  13. Q. Chen, E. Ramé, and S. Garoff, Phys. Fluids 7, 2631 (1995).
  14. Q. Chen, E. Ramé, and S. Garoff, J. Fluid Mech. 337, 49 (1997).
  15. E. Ramé and S. Garoff, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 177, 234 (1996).
  16. P.A. Thompson and M.O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 766 (1989).
  17. J. Koplik, J.R. Banavar, and J.F. Willemsen, Phys. Fluids A 1, 781 (1989).
  18. P.A. Thompson, W.B. Brinckerhoff, and M.O. Robbins, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 7, 535 (1993).
  19. P.A. Thompson and M.O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. A 41, 6830 (1990).
  20. C. Denniston and M.O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 178302 (2001).
  21. J.-L. Barrat and L. Bocquet, Faraday Discuss. 112, 119 (1999).
  22. P. Seppecher, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 34, 977 (1996).
  23. D. Jacqmin, J. Fluid Mech. 402, 57 (2000).
  24. H.-Y. Chen, D. Jasnow, and J. Viñals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1686 (2000).
  25. D. Grubert and J.M. Yeomans, Comput. Phys. Commun. 121, 236 (1999).
  26. J.-C. Desplat, I. Pagonabarraga, and P. Bladon, Comput. Phys. Commun. 134, 273 (2001).
  27. A.J. Briant, P. Papatzacos, and J.M. Yeomans, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 360, 485 (2002).
  28. M.R. Swift, W.R. Osborn, and J.M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 830 (1995).
  29. P. Bhatnagar, E.P. Gross, and M.K. Krook, Phys. Rev. 94, 511 (1954).
  30. Y.H. Qian, D. d’Humières, and P. Lallemand, Europhys. Lett. 17, 479 (1992).
  31. M.R. Swift, E. Orlandini, W.R. Osborn, and J.M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. E 54, 5041 (1996).
  32. D.J. Holdych, D. Rovas, J.G. Georgiadis, and R.O. Buckius, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 9, 1393 (1998).
  33. S. Hou, Q. Zou, S. Chen, G. Doolen, and A.C. Cogley, J. Comput. Phys. 118, 329 (1995).
  34. D.M. Anderson, G.B. McFadden, and A.A. Wheeler, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 139 (1998).
  35. J.W. Cahn, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3667 (1977).
  36. H. Sagan, Introduction to Calculus of Variations (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969).
  37. P. Papatzacos, Transp. Porous Media 49, 139 (2002).
  38. A.J. Briant, D. Phil., University of Oxford (2003).
  39. R.D.M. Travasso, A.J. Bray, and A. Cavagna, J. Phys. A 34, 195 (2001).
  40. In Ref. [27] we presented data to show that the midpoint angle converged to an apparent contact angle and estimated this angle by a plot against 1/Lx. Here we present a theory which suggests a better way to perform this extrapolation. We also note that the data presented here is slightly different from that in Ref. [27] due to inconsistencies in the initial conditions and system sizes in that work.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation