Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions

R. Guimerà1,2, L. Danon3,4, A. Díaz-Guilera3,1, F. Giralt1, and A. Arenas4

  • 1Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalunya, Spain
  • 2Department of Chemical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 3Departament de Física Fonamental, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
  • 4Departament d’Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Catalunya, Spain

Phys. Rev. E 68, 065103(R) – Published 17 December, 2003

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065103

Abstract

We propose a procedure for analyzing and characterizing complex networks. We apply this to the social network as constructed from email communications within a medium sized university with about 1700 employees. Email networks provide an accurate and nonintrusive description of the flow of information within human organizations. Our results reveal the self-organization of the network into a state where the distribution of community sizes is self-similar. This suggests that a universal mechanism, responsible for emergence of scaling in other self-organized complex systems, as, for instance, river networks, could also be the underlying driving force in the formation and evolution of social networks.

References (26)

  1. D.J. Watts et al., Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998).
  2. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
  3. L.A.N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Barthelemy, and H.E. Stanley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 11 149 (2000).
  4. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
  5. S. Dorogovtsev et al., Adv. Phys. 51, 1079 (2002).
  6. M. Girvan and M.E.J. Newman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7821 (2002).
  7. J. Banavar et al., Nature (London) 399, 130 (1999).
  8. M. Buchanan, Nature (London) 419, 787 (2002).
  9. H. Ebel et al., Phys. Rev. E 66, 035103 (2002).
  10. R. Smith (unpublished); R. Smith, e-print cond-mat/0206378.
  11. X. Guardiola et al. (unpublished); X. Guardiola e-print cond-mat/0206240.
  12. M.E.J. Newman et al., Phys. Rev. E 66, 035101(R) (2002).
  13. M.E.J. Newman et al., Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001).
  14. S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
  15. M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001).
  16. I. Rodriguez-Iturbe and A. Rinaldo, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-organization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
  17. T.C. Halsey, Europhys. Lett. 39, 43 (1997).
  18. E. Ravasz and A.-L. Barabasi, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026112 (2003).
  19. B. Bollobas, Random Graphs, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
  20. A. Rinaldo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 822 (1993).
  21. A. Maritan et al., Phys. Rev. E 53, 1510 (1996).
  22. S. Kramer and M. Marder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 205 (1992).
  23. K. Sinclair and R.C. Ball, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3360 (1996).
  24. R.E. Horton, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 56, 275 (1945).
  25. A.N. Strahler, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 63, 923 (1952).
  26. We consider that the network is also unweighted, disregarding the fact that some links correspond to a single interchange of emails and others to the interchange of many emails.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation