Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Dynamical mechanism for coexistence of dispersing species without trade-offs in spatially extended ecological systems

Mary Ann Harrison1, Ying-Cheng Lai2, and Robert D. Holt3

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045
  • 2Departments of Mathematics, Electrical Engineering, and Physics, Center for Systems Science and Engineering Research, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
  • 3Museum of Natural History, Department of Systematics and Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045

Phys. Rev. E 63, 051905 – Published 18 April, 2001

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.051905

Abstract

Most prior studies on the role of dispersal in the coexistence of competing species have emphasized the need for trade-offs between competitive and colonizing abilities for coexistence. Theoretical studies of the evolution of dispersal recently have revealed an alternative mechanism for the coexistence of species differing solely in dispersal rates in spatially extended systems. We present an analysis and numerical evidence indicating that chaotic synchronism, occurring in an extremely intermittent form, is an important feature of the spatiotemporal variation in fitness required for the coexistence of species without trade-offs.

Comments & Replies

References (20)

  1. G. E. Hutchinson, An Introduction to Population Ecology (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1987).
  2. J. Roughgarden, R. M. May, and S. A. Levin, Perspectives in Ecological Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989).
  3. M. Tokeshi, Species Coexistence: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
  4. I. Hanski, Metapopulation Ecology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
  5. C. L. Lehman and D. Tilman, Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, edited by D. Tilman and P. Kareiva (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997), pp. 185–203.
  6. J. P. Grover, Resource Competition (Chapman and Hall, London, 1997).
  7. A. Hastings, Theor. Popul. Biol. 24, 244 (1983).
  8. R. D. Holt, Theor. Popul. Biol. 28, 181 (1985).
  9. R. D. Holt and M. A. McPeek, Am. Nat. 148, 709 (1996).
  10. M. Doebeli and G. D. Ruxton, Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.) 51, 1730 (1997).
  11. R. Law, in Advanced Ecological Theory, edited by J. McGlade (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 143–171.
  12. See, for example, E. A. Spiegel, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 617, 305 (1981); H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74, 919 (1985); ibid.75, 1087 (1986); A. S. Pikovsky and P. Grassberger, J. Phys. A 24, 4587 (1991); N. Platt, E. A. Spiegel, and C. Tresser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 279 (1993); Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. E 53, R4267 (1996); ibid.54, 321 (1996); T. Yalcinkaya and Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5039 (1997).
  13. J. F. Heagy, N. Platt, and S. M. Hammel, Phys. Rev. E 49, 1140 (1994).
  14. In ecology, it has recently been observed that on-off intermittency describes the dynamics of many natural populations, where variable periods of time at low rarity alternate with sudden outbreaks. The intermittency can arise from different models of competition, where coexistence arises because of a local storage effect [P. L. Chesson, Community Ecology (Harper and Row, New York, 1986)]. However, we here demonstrate that on-off intermittency characterizes a competition model where coexistence arises from dispersal among patches.
  15. H. Caswell (personal communication).
  16. R. M. May and G. F. Oster, Nature (London) 110, 573 (1976).
  17. N. F. Rulkov, M. M. Sushchik, L. S. Tsimring, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995).
  18. Strictly speaking, the 1.5 algebraic exponent in the distribution of laminar phases occurs only at the onset of the on-off intermittency [13]. In parameter regimes away from the onset, the algebraic behavior only occurs at small intervals of Δt with no universal exponent. The laminar-phase distribution is typically exponential for large values of Δt. These are in fact observed in our numerical experiments.
  19. See, for example, Y.-C. Lai and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. E 52, R3313 (1995).
  20. See, for example, M. Gadgil, Ecology 52, 253 (1971); D. A. Roff, Oecologia 19, 217 (1975); ibid.J. A. Metz, T. J. Dejong, and P. G. Klinkham, 57, 166 (1983); S. A. Levin, D. Cohen, and A. Hastings, Theor Popul. Biol. 26, 165 (1984); ibid.D. Cohen and S. A. Levin, 39, 63 (1991).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation