- Access by Xinjiang University
Correlation transitions in the Ising chain with competing short-range and long-range mirror interactions
Phys. Rev. E 58, 5403 – Published 1 November, 1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5403
Abstract
We present exact four-spin- and string-correlation functions derived for an Ising chain with competing geometrical nearest-neighbor short-range and mirror-image-type long-range interactions. Unusual correlation effects were found, indicating qualitative changes in the behavior of the system in different T domains. These domains are not separated by a sharp, traditional phase transition, but are delimited by a temperature at which the exact connected four-spin-correlation function vanishes. At the same the pair-correlation function changes its character: The functional form of the correlation length and the nature of the long-range decay are modified.
References (26)
- S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 53, 52 (1996); F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Lett. 93A, 464 (1983).
- S. P. Strong and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2419 (1992); I. Affleck (unpublished); J. Zang, A. R. Bishop, and D. Schmeltzer, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6723 (1995).
- S. Chakraverty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4446 (1996); E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996).
- A. Kolezhuk, R. Roth, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5142 (1996).
- Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 126 (1997).
- R. Chitra, S. Pati, H. R. Krishnamurthy, D. Sen, and S. Ramasesha, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6581 (1995).
- K. Hida, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2207 (1992); ibid.P. J. M. Bastiaansen and H. J. F. Knops, 53, 126 (1996).
- M. Azuma (unpublished).
- U. Schollwöck, T. Jolicoeur, and T. Garel, Phys. Rev. B 53, 3304 (1996).
- Y. Muraoka, K. Oda, J. W. Tucker, and T. Idogaki, J. Phys. A 29, 949 (1996).
- M. Kardar and M. Kaufman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1210 (1983); ibid.P. Bak and R. Bruinsma, 49, 249 (1982).
- U. Löw, V. J. Emery, K. Fabritius, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1918 (1994).
- M. Sobkowicz and B. Chakraborty, J. Stat. Phys. 83, 739 (1996).
- P. J. M. Bastiansen and H. J. F. Knops, Phys. Rev. B 53, 126 (1996).
- M. Sahimi and D. Stauffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4271 (1993).
- W. Jezewski, J. Stat. Phys. 82, 1099 (1996).
- M. Mito et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 4402 (1995).
- W. Selke, Phys. Rep. 170, 213 (1988).
- In this case, i is the ladder step position, while is the chain index within the ladder.
- M. Hunyadi and Zs. Gulácsi, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2326 (1996).
- B. D. Simons and B. L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1102 (1994).
- F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 635 (1988); ibid.B. S. Shastry, 60, 639 (1988).
- R. J. de Boer et al., in Thinking about Biology, edited by F. J. Varela and W. D. Stein (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1992).
- That is when or cannot be expressed as a product of terms.
- A. K. Kolezhuk and H. J. Mikeska, Phys. Rev. B 53, R8848 (1996).
- For all with the same Alternating sequence of subsequent spin positions on different sides of O gives the same results as before with For a symmetric adjacent spin sequence in the middle) and