Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Smoothed density of states for problems with ray splitting

R. E. Prange, Edward Ott, T. M. Antonsen, Jr., Bertrand Georgeot, and Reinhold Blümel

  • Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

Phys. Rev. E 53, 207 – Published 1 January, 1996

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.53.207

Abstract

Ray splitting is the phenomenon whereby a ray incident on a boundary splits into more than one ray traveling away from the boundary. Motivated by the recent application of ideas of quantum chaos to cases with ray splitting, we present an analysis of the smoothed density of states for two-dimensional billiardlike systems with ray splitting. Using a simple heuristic technique, we obtain a contribution (analogous to the usual perimeter contribution) that is proportional to the length of the ray splitting boundary. The result is expressed in a general form, allowing application to a variety of physical situations. A comparison is also made of the analytical result with numerical data from a particular example. © 1996 The American Physical Society.

References (12)

  1. L. Couchman, E. Ott and T. M. Antonsen, Jr., , Phys. Rev. A 46, 6193 (1992).
  2. R. N. Oerter, E. Ott, T. M. Antonsen, Jr., and P. So (unpublished).
  3. R. Blümel, T. M. Antonsen, Jr., B. Georgeot, E. Ott, and R. E. Prange (unpublished).
  4. A. M. Ozorio de Almeida, Hamiltonian Systems: Chaos and Quantization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
  5. M. C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).
  6. E. Ott, Chaos in Dyanmical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993), Chap. 10.
  7. R. B. Balian and C. Bloch, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 60, 401 (1970); ibid. 63, 592 (1971); ibid. 64, 271 (1971).
  8. D. J. Vasil'ev, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 49, 173 (1987). This paper's result also includes the possibility of ray splitting although the situation studied does not apply to any of the cases we consider [e.g., Fig. 1(a)].
  9. See also M. Sieber, H. Primack, U. Smilansky, I. Ussishkin, and H. Schanz (unpublished).
  10. For example, H.-J. Stockmann and J. Stein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2215 (1990); S. Sridhar, ibid. 67, 785 (1991); H. D. Graf et al., ibid. 69, 1296 (1992); P. So, S. M. Anlage, E. Ott and R. N. Oerter, ibid. 74, 2662 (1995).
  11. The situation in Fig. 1(c) can also be treated by summing four contributions of the form of (8) corresponding to the four reflection coefficients, one for S waves incident from x < 0 converted to reflected S waves in x < 0 and similar reflection coefficients for P waves incident from x < 0, S waves incident from x > 0, and P waves incident from x > 0.
  12. Quantum chaos experiments in elastic media have recently been done [R. L. Weaver, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1001 (1989); D. Delande, D. Sornette and R. Weaver, 93, 1873 (1994); C. Ellegard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1546 (1996)].

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation