Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Hydrodynamic dispersion at stagnation points: Simulations and experiments

E. G. Flekkøy, U. Oxaal, J. Feder, and T. Jøssang

  • Centre for Advanced Study at the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, P.O. Box 7606 Skillebekk, 0205 Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway

Phys. Rev. E 52, 4952 – Published 1 November, 1995

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.52.4952

Abstract

The spreading of a passive tracer that is convected back and forth inside a porous medium depends both on the random characteristics of the medium and on the presence of stagnation points. We single out the effect of the latter in the present study of hydrodynamic dispersion in the creeping (low Reynolds number) high Péclet number flow around the single stagnation point on a cylindrical obstacle in a Hele-Shaw cell [U. Oxaal, E. G. Flekko/y, and J. Feder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3514 (1994)]. Employing both experiments and lattice Boltzmann simulations we analyze the dispersive spreading of a single tracer line, which is initially perpendicular to the flow direction and then convected back and forth around the cylinder. The lattice Boltzmann model used is a modification of the recently introduced two-dimensional lattice bathnagar-Gross-Krook model for miscible fluid dynamics [E. G. Flekko/y, Phys. Rev. E 47, 4247 (1993)]. It includes the full three-dimensional viscous interaction in the Hele-Shaw cell, and, in the case of steady state flow, it allows for a freely tunable Reynolds number. The diffusive behavior of the system is explored extensively and excellent agreement between simulations and experiment is observed. A method to determine very small molecular diffusion coefficients D, which relies on the combination of results from experiment and simulation, is proposed. It is demonstrated that there is good agreement between the result of this method and independent measurement that are carried out in the present case of relatively large D values.

References (20)

  1. U. Oxaal, E. G. Flekk o y and J. Feder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3514 (1994).
  2. E. G. Flekk o y, Phys. Rev. E 47, 4247 (1993).
  3. P. Rigord, A. Calvo and J. Hulin, Phys. Fluids A 2, 681 (1990).
  4. I. Ippolito, G. Daccord, E. J. Hinch and J. P. Hulin, J. Cont. Hydr. 16, 87 (1994).
  5. Disorder and Mixing, edited by E. Guyon, J. P. Nadal, and Y. Pomeau (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).
  6. Hydrodynamics of Dispersed Media, edited by J. P. Hulin, A. M. Cazabat, E. Guyon, and F. Carmona (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990).
  7. D. Koch and J. Brady, J. Fluid Mech. 154, 399 (1985).
  8. C. Baudet, E. Guyon and Y. Pomeau, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 46, L991 (1985).
  9. Lattice Gas Methods for Partial Differential Equations, edited by G. D. Doolen (Addison Wesley, New York, 1990).
  10. Y. H. Qian, D. d`Humières and P. Lallemand, Europhys. Lett. 17, 479 (1992).
  11. U. Frisch, B. Hasslacher and Y. Pomeau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1505 (1986).
  12. R. Holme and D. H. Rothman, J. Stat. Phys. 68, 409 (1992).
  13. F. J. Higuera and S. Succi, Europhys. Lett. 8, (6), 517 (1989).
  14. D. H. Rothman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3305 (1990).
  15. G. K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970).
  16. D. J. Tritton, Physical Fluid Dynamics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).
  17. A. K. Gunstensen and D. H. Rothman, Physica D 47, 47 (1991).
  18. J. W. Hiby, in Symposium on the Interaction between Fluids and Particles, edited by P. A. Rottenburg and N. T. Shepherd (The Institution of Chemical Engineers, London, 1962), pp. 312 325.
  19. H. P. Langtangen (private communication).
  20. G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 219, 186 (1953).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation