Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Steady states for viscous fingers with anisotropic surface tension

Eugenia Corvera and Hong Guo

David Jasnow

  • Centre for the Physics of Materials, Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T8

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260

Phys. Rev. E 52, 4063 – Published 1 October, 1995

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.52.4063

Abstract

Pattern selection is considered for the case of viscous fingering in rectangular Hele-Shaw geometry in the presence of anisotropic surface tension, using solvability analysis and a boundary-integral method. We find that anisotropy introduced as a sinusoidal perturbation with a fourfold symmetry is irrelevant for small driving velocities and the usual steady-state finger width in the absence of the anisotropy is obtained. For sufficiently large driving velocities a new steady-state width is selected when the anisotropy makes the local interfacial tension a maximum at the finger tip. This is in agreement with recent experimental observations.

References (24)

  1. P. G. Saffman and G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 245, 312 (1958); P. G. Saffman, J. Fluid Mech. 173, 73 (1986).
  2. W. W. Mullins and R. F. Sekerka, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 323 (1963).
  3. D. Jasnow and J. Vi nals, Phys. Rev. A 41, 6910 (1990); H. Guo, D. C. Hong and D. A. Kurtze, ibid. 46, 1867 (1992).
  4. P. Tabeling and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. A 33, 794 (1986); P. Tabeling, G. Zocchi and A. Libchaber, J. Fluid Mech. 177, 67 (1987).
  5. B. Schraiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2028 (1986); D. C. Hong and J. S. Langer, ibid. 2032 (1986); R. Combescot, T. Dombre, V. Hakim, Y. Pomeau, and A. Pumir, ibid. 2036 (1986).
  6. Y. Couder, N. Gérard and M. Rabaud, Phys. Rev. A 34, 5175 (1986); Y. Couder, O. Cardoso, D. Dupuy, P. Tavernier and W. Thom, Europhys. Lett. 2, 437 (1986).
  7. G. Zocchi, B. Shaw, A. Libchaber and L. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. A 36, 1894 (1987).
  8. D. C. Hong and J. S. Langer, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2325 (1987).
  9. H. Guo and D.C. Hong, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2995 (1990).
  10. E. Ben Jacob, R. Godbey, Nigel D. Goldenfeld, J. Koplik, H. Levine, T. Mueller and L.M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1315 (1985).
  11. S. K. Sarkar and D. Jasnow, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5299 (1989).
  12. R. Almgren, W. S. Dai and V. Hakim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3461 (1993).
  13. J. D. Chen, Exp. Fluids 5, 363 (1987).
  14. K. McCloud and J. Maher, Phys. Rev. E 51, 1184 (1995).
  15. J. W. McLean and P. G. Saffman, J. Fluid Mech. 102, 455 (1981).
  16. J. S. Langer, in Le hasard et la matière Chance and Matter, Les Houches, Session XLVI, 1986, edited by J. Soulettie, J. Vannimenus, and R. Stora (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1987); D. Kessler, J. Koplik and H. Levine, Adv. Phys. 37, 255 (1988).
  17. The explicit form of the left hand side of Eq. ( reforigina) is not necessary to follow the remainder of the paper. It can be founded explicitly in Ref. citedaniel.
  18. E. Corvera, Phys. Rev. E 48, 964 (1993).
  19. A. T. Dorsey and O. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3989 (1987).
  20. D. A. Kessler, J. Koplik and H. Levine, Phys. Rev. A 34, 4980 (1986).
  21. Since our approximation in the solvability analysis requires -ε<ν, the result of this analysis is valid when this condition is satisfied.
  22. M. Ben Amar, R. Combescot and Y. Couder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3047 (1993); R. Combescot, Phys. Rev. E 49, 4172 (1994).
  23. J. Vi nals and D. Jasnow, Phys. Rev. A 46, 7777 (1992).
  24. J. Vi nals and D. Jasnow, in Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter Physics IV, edited by D. P. Landau, K. K. Mon, and H. B. Shuttler (Springer Verlag, New York, 1992).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation