Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stimulated-Raman-scattering amplification of attosecond XUV pulses with pulse-train pumps and application to local in-depth plasma-density measurement

Andréas Sundström1,*, Mickael Grech2, István Pusztai1, and Caterina Riconda3

  • 1Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 2LULI, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, CEA, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
  • 3LULI, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, CEA, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, F-75252 Paris, France

  • *andsunds@chalmers.se

Phys. Rev. E 106, 045208 – Published 20 October, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.045208

Abstract

We present a scheme for amplifying an extreme-ultraviolet (XUV) seed isolated attosecond pulse via stimulated Raman scattering of a pulse-train pump. At sufficient seed and pump intensity, the amplification is nonlinear, and the amplitude of the seed pulse can reach that of the pump, one order of magnitude higher than the initial seed amplitude. In the linear amplification regime, we find that the spectral signature of the pump pulse train is imprinted on the spectrum of the amplified seed pulse. Since the spectral signature is imprinted with its frequency downshifted by the plasma frequency, it is possible to deduce the electron density in the region of interaction. This region can be of micrometer length scale longitudinally. By varying the delay between the seed and the pump, this scheme provides a local electron-density measurement inside solid-density plasmas that cannot be probed with optical frequencies, with micrometer resolution.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. M. Ferray, A. L'Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, L31 (1988).
  2. P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Science 292, 1689 (2001).
  3. I. P. Christov, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1251 (1997).
  4. M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Nature (London) 414, 509 (2001).
  5. J. Itatani, F. Quéré, G. L. Yudin, M. Y. Ivanov, F. Krausz, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173903 (2002).
  6. B. Xue, Y. Tamaru, Y. Fu, H. Yuan, P. Lan, O. D. Mücke, A. Suda, K. Midorikawa, and E. J. Takahashi, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2802 (2020).
  7. F. Calegari, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, C. Vozzi, and M. Nisoli, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 062001 (2016).
  8. M. F. Kling and M. J. J. Vrakking, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59, 463 (2008).
  9. F. Calegari, D. Ayuso, A. Trabattoni, L. Belshaw, S. De Camillis, S. Anumula, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, A. Palacios, P. Decleva, J. B. Greenwood, F. Martín, and M. Nisoli, Science 346, 336 (2014).
  10. M. Nisoli, P. Decleva, F. Calegari, A. Palacios, and F. Martín, Chem. Rev. 117, 10760 (2017).
  11. J.-F. Hergott, P. Salières, H. Merdji, L. le Déroff, B. Carré, T. Auguste, P. Monot, P. d'Oliveira, D. Descamps, J. Norin, C. Lyngå, A. L'Huillier, C.-G. Wahlström, M. Bellini, and S. Huller, Laser Part. Beams 19, 35 (2001).
  12. S. Dobosz, G. Doumy, H. Stabile, P. D'Oliveira, P. Monot, F. Réau, S. Hüller, and P. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 025001 (2005).
  13. G. O. Williams, H.-K. Chung, S. M. Vinko, S. Künzel, A. B. Sardinha, Ph. Zeitoun, and M. Fajardo, Phys. Plasmas 20, 042701 (2013).
  14. J. C. P. Koliyadu, S. Künzel, T. Wodzinski, B. Keitel, J. Duarte, G. O. Williams, C. P. João, H. Pires, V. Hariton, M. Galletti, N. Gomes, G. Figueira, J. M. Dias, N. Lopes, P. Zeitoun, E. Plönjes, and M. Fajardo, Photonics 4, 25 (2017).
  15. A. Sundström, I. Pusztai, P. Eng-Johnsson, and T. Fülöp, J. Plasma Phys. 88, 905880211 (2022).
  16. P. Tzallas, E. Skantzakis, L. Nikolopoulos, G. D. Tsakiris, and D. Charalambidis, Nat. Phys. 7, 781 (2011).
  17. E. J. Takahashi, P. Lan, O. D. Mücke, Y. Nabekawa, and K. Midorikawa, Nat. Commun. 4, 2691 (2013).
  18. S. Gordienko, A. Pukhov, O. Shorokhov, and T. Baeva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 115002 (2004).
  19. D. an der Brügge, N. Kumar, A. Pukhov, and C. Rödel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 125002 (2012).
  20. L. Fedeli, A. Sgattoni, G. Cantono, and A. Macchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 051103 (2017).
  21. D. an der Brügge and A. Pukhov, Phys. Plasmas 17, 033110 (2010).
  22. J. M. Mikhailova, M. V. Fedorov, N. Karpowicz, P. Gibbon, V. T. Platonenko, A. M. Zheltikov, and F. Krausz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 245005 (2012).
  23. B. Dromey, S. Rykovanov, M. Yeung, R. Hörlein, D. Jung, D. Gautier, T. Dzelzainis, D. Kiefer, S. Palaniyppan, R. Shah, J. Schreiber, H. Ruhl, J. C. Fernandez, C. L. S. Lewis, M. Zepf, and B. M. Hegelich, Nat. Phys. 8, 804 (2012).
  24. A. A. Gonoskov, A. V. Korzhimanov, A. V. Kim, M. Marklund, and A. M. Sergeev, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046403 (2011).
  25. T. G. Blackburn, A. A. Gonoskov, and M. Marklund, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023421 (2018).
  26. P. Gibbon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 50 (1996).
  27. U. Teubner and P. Gibbon, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 445 (2009).
  28. C. Thaury and F. Quéré, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 43, 213001 (2010).
  29. H. Vincenti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 105001 (2019).
  30. L. Fedeli, A. Sainte-Marie, N. Zaim, M. Thévenet, J. L. Vay, A. Myers, F. Quéré, and H. Vincenti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 114801 (2021).
  31. L. Yi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 134801 (2021).
  32. J. A. Wheeler, A. Borot, S. Monchocé, H. Vincenti, A. Ricci, A. Malvache, R. Lopez-Martens, and F. Quéré, Nat. Photonics 6, 829 (2012).
  33. H. Vincenti and F. Quéré, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 113904 (2012).
  34. T. J. Hammond, G. G. Brown, K. T. Kim, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Nat. Photonics 10, 171 (2016).
  35. P. Heissler, R. Hörlein, J. M. Mikhailova, L. Waldecker, P. Tzallas, A. Buck, K. Schmid, C. M. S. Sears, F. Krausz, L. Veisz, M. Zepf, and G. D. Tsakiris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235003 (2012).
  36. M. Kando, T. Z. Esirkepov, J. K. Koga, A. S. Pirozhkov, and S. V. Bulanov, Quantum Beam Sci. 2, 9 (2018).
  37. O. Jahn, V. E. Leshchenko, P. Tzallas, A. Kessel, M. Krüger, A. Münzer, S. A. Trushin, G. D. Tsakiris, S. Kahaly, D. Kormin, L. Veisz, V. Pervak, F. Krausz, Z. Major, and S. Karsch, Optica 6, 280 (2019).
  38. M. Maier, W. Kaiser, and J. A. Giordmaine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1275 (1966).
  39. Y. Ping, I. Geltner, N. J. Fisch, G. Shvets, and S. Suckewer, Phys. Rev. E 62, R4532(R) (2000).
  40. W. Cheng, Y. Avitzour, Y. Ping, S. Suckewer, N. J. Fisch, M. S. Hur, and J. S. Wurtele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 045003 (2005).
  41. J. Ren, W. Cheng, S. Li, and S. Suckewer, Nat. Phys. 3, 732 (2007).
  42. R. M. G. M. Trines, F. Fiúza, R. Bingham, R. A. Fonseca, L. O. Silva, R. A. Cairns, and P. A. Norreys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 105002 (2011).
  43. R. M. G. M. Trines, E. P. Alves, E. Webb, J. Vieira, F. Fiúza, R. A. Fonseca, L. O. Silva, R. A. Cairns, and R. Bingham, Sci. Rep. 10, 19875 (2020).
  44. H. Jang, M. S. Hur, J. M. Lee, M. H. Cho, W. Namkung, and H. Suk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 071506 (2008).
  45. M.-H. Cho, Y.-K. Kim, and M. S. Hur, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 141107 (2014).
  46. H. S. Song, M.-H. Cho, Y.-K. Kim, T. Kang, H. Suk, and M. S. Hur, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 58, 025006 (2016).
  47. G. Vieux, B. Ersfeld, J. P. Farmer, M. S. Hur, R. C. Issac, and D. A. Jaroszynski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 121106 (2013).
  48. M. R. Edwards, J. M. Mikhailova, and N. J. Fisch, Phys. Rev. E 96, 023209 (2017).
  49. J. Derouillat, A. Beck, F. Pérez, T. Vinci, M. Chiaramello, A. Grassi, M. Flé, G. Bouchard, I. Plotnikov, N. Aunai, J. Dargent, C. Riconda, and M. Grech, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 351 (2018).
  50. F. Pérez, L. Gremillet, A. Decoster, M. Drouin, and E. Lefebvre, Phys. Plasmas 19, 083104 (2012).
  51. The spatial resolution was doubled, Δx0.34 nm, and the number of particles per cell was increased to 8000 per cell and per species, i.e., in total 16 times the number of particles compared with the nominal simulations. We deemed that the simulation results of the spontaneous RS were sufficiently converged when the energy difference between 4000 and 8000 particles per cell was smaller than 10%.
  52. C. E. Max, J. Arons, and A. B. Langdon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 209 (1974).
  53. S. Weber, C. Riconda, L. Lancia, J.-R. Marquès, G. A. Mourou, and J. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 055004 (2013).
  54. R. M. G. M. Trines, F. Fiuza, R. Bingham, R. A. Fonseca, L. O. Silva, R. A. Cairns, and P. A. Norreys, Nat. Phys. 7, 87 (2011).
  55. A. Sundström, L. Gremillet, E. Siminos, and I. Pusztai, J. Plasma Phys. 86, 755860201 (2020).
  56. A. Sundström, L. Gremillet, E. Siminos, and I. Pusztai, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 62, 085015 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation