Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Incommensurate phases in the two-dimensional XY model with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions

G. Albuquerque Silva1, J. A. Plascak1,2,3, and D. P. Landau3

  • 1Departamento de Física, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, C.P. 702, 30123-970 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
  • 2Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza–Campus I, Departamento de Física, CCEN Cidade Universitária, 58051-970 João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
  • 3Center for Simulational Physics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

Phys. Rev. E 106, 044116 – Published 13 October, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044116

Abstract

The two-dimensional XY model with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction has been studied through extensive Monte Carlo simulations. A hybrid algorithm consisting of single-spin Metropolis and Swendsen-Wang cluster-spin updates has been employed. Single histogram techniques have been used to obtain the thermodynamic variables of interest and finite-size-scaling analysis has led to the phase transition behavior in the thermodynamic limit. Fluctuating boundary conditions have been utilized in order to match the incommensurability between the spin structures and the finite lattice sizes due to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. The effects of the fluctuating boundary conditions have been analyzed in detail in both commensurate and incommensurate cases. The Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature has been obtained as a function of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and the results are in excellent agreement with the exact equation for the transition line. The spin-spin correlation function critical exponent has been computed as a function of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and temperature. In the incommensurate cases, optimal sizes for the finite lattices and the distribution of the boundary shift angle have been extracted. Analysis of the low temperature configurations and the corresponding vortex-antivortex pairs have also been addressed in some regions of the phase diagram.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. T. Matsubara and H. Matsuda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 569 (1956).
  2. T. Ohta and D. Jasnow, Phys. Rev. B 20, 139 (1979).
  3. D. J. Resnick, J. C. Garland, J. T. Boyd, S. Shoemaker, and R. S. Newrock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1542 (1981).
  4. V. L. Berezinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 493 (1971).
  5. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 6, 1181 (1973).
  6. J. M. Kosterlitz, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 7, 1046 (1974).
  7. I. Dzyaloshinsky, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958).
  8. T. Moriya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 228 (1960); Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960).
  9. D. Coffey, K. S. Bedell, and S. A. Trugman, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6509 (1990).
  10. M. Uchida, Y. Onose, Y. Matsui et al., Science 311, 359 (2006).
  11. M. Bode, M. Heide, K. V. Bergmann et al., Nature 447, 190 (2007).
  12. P. Ferriani, K. von Bergmann, E. Y. Vedmedenko, S. Heinze, M. Bode, M. Heide, G. Bihlmayer, S. Blugel, and R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 027201 (2008).
  13. S. V. Grigoriev, Yu. O. Chetverikov, D. Lott, and A. Schreyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 197203 (2008).
  14. H. Liu, J. A. Plascak, and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052118 (2018).
  15. F. C. Alcaraz and W. F. Wreszinski, J. Stat. Phys. 58, 45 (1990).
  16. P. Olsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3339 (1994).
  17. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth et al., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
  18. R. H. Swendsen and J. S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987).
  19. M. S. S. Challa and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 33, 437 (1986).
  20. E. Rastelli, S. Regina, and A. Tassi, Phys. Rev. B 69, 174407 (2004); 70, 174447 (2004).
  21. M. E. Fisher, in Proceeding of the International Summer School “Enrico Fermi” 1970, Course 51, Varenna, Italy, edited by M. S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1971).
  22. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics, 5th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2021).
  23. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matt. 43, 119 (1981).
  24. S. T. Bramwell and P. C. W. Holdsworth, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, L53 (1993).
  25. D. Venus, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235440 (2022).
  26. Y.-D. Hsieh, Y.-J. Kao, and A. W. Sandvik, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P09001 .
  27. P. H. Nguyen and M. Boninsegni, Appl. Sci. 11, 4931 (2021).
  28. S. Yun-Zhou, L. Hui-Ping, and Y. Lin, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 46, 663 (2006).
  29. Y.-Z. Sun, L. Yi, and J.-S. Wang, Commun. Comput. Phys. 11, 1169 (2012).
  30. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics, edited by D. F. Brewer (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978), Chap. 5.
  31. R. Gupta and C. F. Baillie, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2883 (1992).
  32. W. Selke, Eur. Phys. J. B 51, 223 (2006).
  33. Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation