Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Exact solution of the “Rule 150” reversible cellular automaton

Joseph W. P. Wilkinson1,2,*, Tomaž Prosen3, and Juan P. Garrahan1,2

  • 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
  • 2Centre for the Mathematics and Theoretical Physics of Quantum Non-equilibrium Systems, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

  • *Corresponding author: joseph.wilkinson@nottingham.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. E 105, 034124 – Published 17 March, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.034124

Abstract

We study the dynamics and statistics of the Rule 150 reversible cellular automaton (RCA). This is a one-dimensional lattice system of binary variables with synchronous (Floquet) dynamics that corresponds to a bulk deterministic and reversible discretized version of the kinetically constrained “exclusive one-spin facilitated” (XOR) Fredrickson-Andersen (FA) model, where the local dynamics is restricted: A site flips if and only if its adjacent sites are in different states from each other. Similar to other RCA that have been recently studied, such as Rule 54 and Rule 201, the Rule 150 RCA is integrable, however, in contrast is noninteracting: The emergent quasiparticles, which are identified by the domain walls, behave as free fermions. This property allows us to solve the model by means of matrix product ansatz. In particular, we find the exact equilibrium and nonequilibrium stationary states for systems with closed (periodic) and open (stochastic) boundaries, respectively, resolve the full spectrum of the time evolution operator and, therefore, gain access to the relaxation dynamics, and obtain the exact large deviation statistics of dynamical observables in the long-time limit.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. A. Bobenko, M. Bordemann, C. Gunn, and U. Pinkall, On two integrable cellular automata, Commun. Math. Phys. 158, 127 (1993).
  2. T. Prosen and C. Mejía-Monasterio, Integrability of a deterministic cellular automaton driven by stochastic boundaries, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 185003 (2016).
  3. A. Inoue and S. Takesue, Two extensions of exact nonequilibrium steady states of a boundary-driven cellular automaton, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 425001 (2018).
  4. T. Prosen and B. Buča, Exact matrix product decay modes of a boundary driven cellular automaton, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 395002 (2017).
  5. B. Buča, J. P. Garrahan, T. Prosen, and M. Vanicat, Exact large deviation statistics and trajectory phase transition of a deterministic boundary driven cellular automaton, Phys. Rev. E 100, 020103(R) (2019).
  6. A. J. Friedman, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Integrable Many-Body Quantum Floquet-Thouless Pumps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170603 (2019).
  7. S. Gopalakrishnan, Operator growth and eigenstate entanglement in an interacting integrable floquet system, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060302(R) (2018).
  8. S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, V. Khemani, and R. Vasseur, Hydrodynamics of operator spreading and quasiparticle diffusion in interacting integrable systems, Phys. Rev. B 98, 220303(R) (2018).
  9. K. Klobas, M. Medenjak, T. Prosen, and M. Vanicat, Time-dependent matrix product ansatz for interacting reversible dynamics, Commun. Math. Phys. 371, 651 (2019).
  10. K. Klobas and T. Prosen, Space-like dynamics in a reversible cellular automaton, SciPost Phys. Core 2, 010 (2020).
  11. V. Alba, J. Dubail, and M. Medenjak, Operator Entanglement in Interacting Integrable Quantum Systems: The Case of the Rule 54 Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250603 (2019).
  12. V. Alba, Diffusion and operator entanglement spreading, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094410 (2021).
  13. B. Buča, K. Klobas, and T. Prosen, Rule 54: Exactly solvable model of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, J. Stat. Mech. (2021) 074001.
  14. T. Iadecola and S. Vijay, Nonergodic quantum dynamics from deformations of classical cellular automata, Phys. Rev. B 102, 180302(R) (2020).
  15. J. W. P. Wilkinson, K. Klobas, T. Prosen, and J. P. Garrahan, Exact solution of the Floquet-PXP cellular automaton, Phys. Rev. E 102, 062107 (2020).
  16. F. Ritort and P. Sollich, Glassy dynamics of kinetically constrained models, Adv. Phys. 52, 219 (2003).
  17. J. P. Garrahan, P. Sollich, and C. Toninelli, Kinetically constrained models, in Dynamical Heterogeneities in Glasses, Colloids, and Granular Media, International Series of Monographs on Physics, edited by L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, L. Cipelletti, and W. van Saarloos (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011), Chap. 10, pp. 341–366.
  18. J. P. Garrahan, Aspects of nonequilibrium in classical and quantum systems: Slow relaxation and glasses, dynamical large deviations, quantum nonergodicity, and open quantum dynamics, Physica A 504, 130 (2018).
  19. L. Causer, I. Lesanovsky, M. C. Bañuls, and J. P. Garrahan, Dynamics and large deviation transitions of the XOR-Fredrickson-Andersen kinetically constrained model, Phys. Rev. E 102, 052132 (2020).
  20. G. H. Fredrickson and H. C. Andersen, Kinetic Ising Model of the Glass Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1244 (1984).
  21. P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075106 (2004).
  22. T. Gombor and B. Pozsgay, Integrable spin chains and cellular automata with medium-range interaction, Phys. Rev. E 104, 054123 (2021).
  23. R. G. Palmer, D. L. Stein, E. Abrahams, and P. W. Anderson, Models of Hierarchically Constrained Dynamics for Glassy Relaxation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 958 (1984).
  24. J. Jäckle and S. Z. Eisinger, A hierarchically constrained kinetic Ising model, Z. Phys. B 84, 115 (1991).
  25. N. Cancrini, F. Martinelli, C. Roberto, and C. Toninelli, Kinetically constrained spin models, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 140, 459 (2007).
  26. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum Entanglement Growth Under Random Unitary Dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
  27. A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
  28. A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Solution of a Minimal Model for Many-Body Quantum Chaos, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041019 (2018).
  29. B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact Correlation Functions for Dual-Unitary Lattice Models in 1 + 1 Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210601 (2019).
  30. C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and Entanglement Growth in Systems Without Conservation Laws, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018).
  31. T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W. von Keyserlingk, Diffusive Hydrodynamics of Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators with Charge Conservation, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031058 (2018).
  32. C. Sünderhauf, D. Pérez-García, D. A. Huse, N. Schuch, and J. I. Cirac, Localization with random time-periodic quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134204 (2018).
  33. V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Operator Spreading and the Emergence of Dissipative Hydrodynamics Under Unitary Evolution with Conservation Laws, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031057 (2018).
  34. S. Pai, M. Pretko, and R. M. Nandkishore, Localization in Fractonic Random Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021003 (2019).
  35. Ž. Krajnik and T. Prosen, Kardar–Parisi–Zhang physics in integrable rotationally symmetric dynamics on discrete space–time lattice, J. Stat. Phys. 179, 110 (2020).
  36. K. Klobas, B. Bertini, and L. Piroli, Exact Thermalization Dynamics in the “Rule 54” Quantum Cellular Automaton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 160602 (2021).
  37. M. van Horssen, E. Levi, and J. P. Garrahan, Dynamics of many-body localization in a translation-invariant quantum glass model, Phys. Rev. B 92, 100305(R) (2015).
  38. Z. Lan, M. van Horssen, S. Powell, and J. P. Garrahan, Quantum Slow Relaxation and Metastability Due to Dynamical Constraints, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 040603 (2018).
  39. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a Rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and stability to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155134 (2018).
  40. N. Pancotti, G. Giudice, J. I. Cirac, J. P. Garrahan, and M. C. Bañuls, Quantum East Model: Localization, Nonthermal Eigenstates, and Slow Dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021051 (2020).
  41. S. Gopalakrishnan and B. Zakirov, Facilitated quantum cellular automata as simple models with nonthermal eigenstates and dynamics, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 044004 (2018).
  42. K. Klobas, M. Vanicat, J. P. Garrahan, and T. Prosen, Matrix product state of multi-time correlations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 335001 (2020).
  43. R. Serfozo, Basics of Applied Stochastic Processes (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  44. H. Bethe, On the theory of metals, Z. Phys. 71, 205 (1931).
  45. G. H. Hardy, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
  46. J. P. Garrahan, R. L. Jack, V. Lecomte, E. Pitard, K. van Duijvendijk, and F. van Wijland, Dynamical First-Order Phase Transition in Kinetically Constrained Models of Glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 195702 (2007).
  47. J. P. Garrahan, R. L. Jack, V. Lecomte, E. Pitard, K. van Duijvendijk, and F. van Wijland, First-order dynamical phase transition in models of glasses: an approach based on ensembles of histories, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 075007 (2009).
  48. V. Lecomte, C. Appert-Rolland, and F. van Wijland, Thermodynamic formalism for systems with Markov dynamics, J. Stat. Phys. 127, 51 (2007).
  49. C. Appert-Rolland, B. Derrida, V. Lecomte, and F. van Wijland, Universal cumulants of the current in diffusive systems on a ring, Phys. Rev. E 78, 021122 (2008).
  50. C. P. Espigares, P. L. Garrido, and P. I. Hurtado, Dynamical phase transition for current statistics in a simple driven diffusive system, Phys. Rev. E 87, 032115 (2013).
  51. D. Karevski and G. M. Schütz, Conformal Invariance in Driven Diffusive Systems at High Currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030601 (2017).
  52. P. Helms, U. Ray, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Dynamical phase behavior of the single- and multi-lane asymmetric simple exclusion process via matrix product states, Phys. Rev. E 100, 022101 (2019).
  53. C. Monthus, Revisiting the Ruelle thermodynamic formalism for markov trajectories with application to the glassy phase of random trap models, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2021) 063301.
  54. C. Maes, Frenesy: Time-symmetric dynamical activity in nonequilibria, Phys. Rep. 850, 1 (2020).
  55. H. Touchette, The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics, Phys. Rep. 478, 1 (2009).
  56. V. S. Borkar, S. Juneja, and A. A. Kherani, Peformance analysis conditioned on rare events: An adaptive simulation scheme, Commun. Inf. Syst. 3, 259 (2003).
  57. R. L. Jack and P. Sollich, Large deviations and ensembles of trajectories in stochastic models, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 184, 304 (2010).
  58. R. Chetrite and H. Touchette, Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations, Ann. Henri Poincaré 16, 2005 (2015).
  59. J. P. Garrahan, Classical stochastic dynamics and continuous matrix product states: Gauge transformations, conditioned and driven processes, and equivalence of trajectory ensembles, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp (2016) 073208.
  60. T. Prosen, Reversible cellular automata as integrable interactions round-a-face: Deterministic, stochastic, and quantized, arXiv:2106.01292.
  61. G. E. Andrews, The Theory of Partitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1976).
  62. N. J. A. Sloane, The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (2021), https://oeis.org/A000041.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation