- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
From scattered to focused: Task-dependent connectivity in honey bees, with midge swarms and bird flocks
Phys. Rev. E 113, 044403 – Published 2 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9mfj-2jh2
Abstract
Collective motion in biological swarms emerges from local interactions among individuals with limited sensing and cognition, offering valuable insights for decentralized engineered systems. This study presents a systematic framework for extracting interaction graphs from multiagent trajectory data. Three graph identification methods, sparse regression, Granger causality, and cross-correlation, together with geometric anisotropy analysis, are applied to experimental recordings of honey bees during scattered and focused return-to-hive behaviors, aggregations of midges, and flocking passerine jackdaws. Connectivity analysis reveals task-dependent interaction structures: scattered honey bees exhibit causal interactions with up to ten neighbors, whereas focused bees interact with only two to three agents, with midges showing slightly lower connectivity. Cross-correlation analysis indicated honey bees exhibit distance-sensitivity in close proximity, while flocking birds exhibit a distance-dependent correlation decline. These results highlight diverse coordination mechanisms relevant to bio-inspired networked systems.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
synopsis
What Network Structures Reveal About the Birds and the Bees
Representing bird flocks and insect swarms as nodes connected in a complex structure yields new insights into animal collective behavior.
See more in Physics
Article Text
References (55)
- M. Papadopoulou, I. Fürtbauer, L. R. O'Bryan, S. Garnier, D. G. Georgopoulou, A. M. Bracken, C. Christensen, and A. J. King, Dynamics of collective motion across time and species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 378, 20220068 (2023).
- D. H. Kelley and N. T. Ouellette, Emergent dynamics of laboratory insect swarms, Sci. Rep. 3, 1073 (2013).
- K. V. D. Vaart, M. Sinhuber, A. M. Reynolds, and N. T. Ouellette, Environmental perturbations induce correlations in midge swarms, J. R. Soc., Interface 17, 20200018 (2020).
- M. Sinhuber, K. van der Vaart, Y. Feng, A. M. Reynolds, and N. T. Ouellette, An equation of state for insect swarms, Sci. Rep. 11, 3773 (2021).
- J. G. Puckett, R. Ni, and N. T. Ouellette, Time-frequency analysis reveals pairwise interactions in insect swarms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 258103 (2015).
- A. Attanasi, A. Cavagna, L. Del Castello, I. Giardina, S. Melillo, L. Parisi, O. Pohl, B. Rossaro, E. Shen, E. Silvestri, and M. Viale, Collective behaviour without collective order in wild swarms of midges, PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003697 (2014).
- M. V. Fyodorova and A. I. Azovsky, Interactions between swarming Chironomus annularius (Diptera: Chironomidae) males: Role of acoustic behavior, J. Insect Behav. 16, 295 (2003).
- C. Pennetier, B. Warren, K. R. Dabiré, I. J. Russell, and G. Gibson, “Singing on the wing” as a mechanism for species recognition in the malarial mosquito Anopheles gambiae, Curr. Biol. 20, 131 (2010).
- H. Chaté and M. Muñoz, Insect swarms go critical, Physics 7, 120 (2014).
- A. Okubo and H. C. Chiang, An analysis of the kinematics of swarming of Anarete pritchardi kim (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), Popul Ecol. 16, 1 (1974).
- C. Buhl, D. J. T. Sumpter, I. D. Couzin, J. J. Hale, E. Despland, E. R. Miller, and S. J. Simpson, From disorder to order in marching locusts, Science 312, 1402 (2006).
- J. A. Downes, The swarming and mating flight of Diptera, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14, 271 (1969).
- G. Nagy, A. Thornton, H. Ling, G. McIvor, N. T. Ouellette, and R. Vaughan, Computational and structural advantages of pairwise flocking, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi-Agent Systems (MRS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2019), pp. 133–135.
- J. W. Jolles, A. J. King, A. Manica, and A. Thornton, Heterogeneous structure in mixed-species corvid flocks in flight, Anim. Behav. 85, 743 (2013).
- H. Ling, G. E. Mclvor, K. van der Vaart, R. T. Vaughan, A. Thornton, and N. T. Ouellette, Costs and benefits of social relationships in the collective motion of bird flocks, Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 943 (2019).
- M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, M. Viale, and V. Zdravkovic, Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1232 (2008).
- A. Cavagna, A. Cimarelli, I. Giardina, G. Parisi, R. Santagati, F. Stefanini, and R. Tavarone, From empirical data to inter-individualinteractions: Unveiling the rules of collective animal behavio, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20, 1491 (2010).
- A. Cavagna, A. Cimarelli, I. Giardina, G. Parisi, R. Santagati, F. Stefanini, and M. Viale, Scale-free correlations in starling flocks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11865 (2010).
- V. Nityananda, Attention-like processes in insects, Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20161986 (2016).
- A. C. Paulk, J. A. Stacey, T. W. J. Pearson, G. J. Taylor, R. J. D. Moore, M. V. Srinivasan, and B. Van Swinderen, Selective attention in the honeybee optic lobes precedes behavioral choices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5006 (2014).
- B. L. De Bivort and B. Van Swinderen, Evidence for selective attention in the insect brain, Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 15, 9 (2016).
- J. Spaethe, J. Tautz, and L. Chittka, Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search? J. Exp. Biol. 209, 987 (2006).
- L. Morawetz and J. Spaethe, Visual attention in a complex search task differs between honeybees and bumblebees, J. Exp. Biol. 215, 2515 (2012).
- S. Zhang, F. Bock, A. Si, J. Tautz, and M. V. Srinivasan, Visual working memory in decision making by honey bees, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 5250 (2005).
- A. Avarguès-Weber, A. G. Dyer, N. Ferrah, and M. Giurfa, The forest or the trees: Preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees, Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20142384 (2015).
- S. D. Wiederman and D. C. O'Carroll, Selective attention in an insect visual neuron, Curr. Biol. 23, 156 (2013).
- S. Rossel, Binocular vision in insects: How mantids solve the correspondence problem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13229 (1996).
- R. Wolf and M. Heisenberg, On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation of Drosophila melanogaster, J. Comp. Physiol. 140, 69 (1980).
- T. S. Collett and M. F. Land, Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverfly Syritta pipiens L., J. Comp. Physiol. 99, 1 (1975).
- R. M. Olberg, R. C. Seaman, M. I. Coats, and A. F. Henry, Eye movements and target fixation during dragonfly prey-interception flights, J. Comp. Physiol. A 193, 685 (2007).
- G. J. Taylor, A. C. Paulk, T. W. J. Pearson, R. J. D. Moore, J. A. Stacey, D. Ball, B. Van Swinderen, and M. V. Srinivasan, Insects modify their behaviour depending on the feedback sensor used when walking on a trackball in virtual-reality, J. Exp. Biol. 2198, 3118 (2015).
- G. Mateos, S. Segarra, A. G. Marques, and A. Ribeiro, Connecting the dots: Identifying network structure via graph signal processing, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 36, 16 (2019).
- X. Dong, D. Thanou, M. Rabbat, and P. Frossard, Learning graphs from data: A signal representation perspective, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 36, 44 (2019).
- X. Dong, D. Thanou, P. Frossard, and P. Vandergheynst, Learning Laplacian matrix in smooth graph signal representations, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 64, 6160 (2016).
- Y. Zhu, M. T. Schaub, A. Jadbabaie, and S. Segarra, Network inference from consensus dynamics with unknown parameters, IEEE Trans. Signal Inf. Process. Networks 6, 300 (2020).
- Q. Jiao, Y. Li, and J. He, Topology inference for consensus-based cooperation under time-invariant latent input, in Proceedings of the IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2021).
- C. Liu, J. He, S. Zhu, and C. Chen, Dynamic topology inference via external observation for multi-robot formation control, in Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2019), pp. 1–6.
- M. Ayazoglu, B. Yilmaz, M. Sznaier, and O. Camps, Finding causal interactions in video sequences, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2013), pp. 3575–3582.
- W. M. Lord, J. Sun, N. T. Ouellette, and E. M. Bollt, Inference of causal information flow in collective animal behavior, IEEE Trans. Mol. Biol. Multi-Scale Commun. 2, 107 (2016).
- M. Y. Mahadeeswara and M. V. Srinivasan, Reconstruction of three-dimensional trajectories of honeybees flying in high-density aerial environments, bioRxiv (2022), doi: 10.1101/2022.11.24.517808.
- M. S. Islam and I. A. Faruque, Insect visuomotor delay adjustments in group flight support swarm cohesion, Sci. Rep. 13, 6407 (2023).
- M. Sinhuber, K. Van Der Vaart, R. Ni, J. G. Puckett, D. H. Kelley, and N. T. Ouellette, Three-dimensional time-resolved trajectories from laboratory insect swarms, Sci. Data 6, 190036 (2019).
- M. S. Islam, I. Ahmed, and I. Faruque, Focused honey bee hive-return flight dataset, Dataset, figshare (2026), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31320871.
- J. H. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent, J. Stat. Software 33, 1 (2010).
- C. W. J. Granger, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica 37, 424 (1969).
- L. Barnett and A. K. Seth, The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference, J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50 (2014).
- G. Box, G. Jenkins, G. Reinsel, and G. Ljung, Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (2015), https://books.google.com/books?id=rNt5CgAAQBAJ.
- M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, M. Viale, and V. Zdravkovic, Empirical investigation of starling flocks: A benchmark study in collective animal behaviour, Anim. Behav. 76, 201 (2008).
- A. Cavagna, I. Giardina, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, and A. Procaccini, The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behaviour: 2. Three-dimensional analysis, Anim. Behav. 76, 237 (2008).
- K. Hanisch, Some remarks on estimators of the distribution function of nearest neighbour distance in stationary spatial point processes, Series Statistics 15, 409 (1984).
- M. S. Islam and I. Faruque, Pairwise interactions, feedback rule changes, and deliberative decisions underlie honeybee inflight group coordination, bioRxiv (2024), doi: 10.1101/2024.10.10.616169.
- G. A. Miller, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychol. Rev. 63, 81 (1956).
- Y. Shang and R. Bouffanais, Influence of the number of topologically interacting neighbors on swarm dynamics, Sci. Rep. 4, 4184 (2014).
- J. G. Puckett and N. T. Ouellette, Determining asymptotically large population sizes in insect swarms, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140710 (2014).
- T. Niizato and Y.-P. Gunji, Metric–topological interaction model of collective behavior, Ecol. Modell. 222, 3041 (2011).