Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Equivalence between nonlinear graph-based dynamics and linear dynamics on higher-order networks

Lucas Lacasa

Phys. Rev. E 114, 044311 – Published 13 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/33lg-7kmc

Abstract

In network science, collective dynamics of complex systems are typically modeled as (nonlinear, often including many-body) vertex-level update rules evolving over a graph interaction structure. In recent years, frameworks that explicitly model such higher-order interactions in the interaction backbone (e.g., hypergraphs) have been advanced, somehow shifting the imputation of the effective nonlinearity from the dynamics to the interaction structure. In this work, we discuss such structural-dynamical representation duality, and we investigate how and when a nonlinear dynamics defined on the vertex set of a graph allows an equivalent representation in terms of a linear dynamics defined on the state space of a sufficiently richer, higher-order interaction structure. Using Carleman linearization arguments, we show that finite polynomial dynamics defined in the |V| vertices of a graph admit an exact representation as linear dynamics on the state space of an hb-graph of order |V|, a combinatorial structure that extends hypergraphs by allowing vertex multiplicity, where the specific shape of the nonlinearity indicates whether the hb-graph is either finite or infinite (in terms of the number of hb-edges). For more general analytic nonlinearities, exact linear representation always require an hb-graph of infinite size, and its finite-size truncation provides an approximate representation of the original nonlinear graph-based dynamics.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (21)

  1. F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lucas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 874, 1 (2020).
  2. C. Bick, E. Gross, H. A. Harrington, and M. T. Schaub, What are higher-order networks? SIAM Rev. 65, 686 (2023).
  3. F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Ferraz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. M. Murray, T. P. Peixoto, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nat. Phys. 17, 1093 (2021).
  4. F. Battiston, C. Bick, M. Lucas, A. P. Millán, P. S. Skardal, and Y. Zhang, Collective dynamics on higher-order networks, Nat. Rev. Phys. 8, 146 (2026).
  5. T. P. Peixoto, L. Peel, T. Gross, and M. de Domenico, Graphs are maximally expressive for higher-order interactions, arXiv:2602.16937.
  6. J. Llabrés, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, and F. Vázquez, Reducibility of higher-order to pairwise interactions: Social impact models on hypergraphs, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023250 (2026).
  7. L. Neuhäuser, A. Mellor, and R. Lambiotte, Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on networked systems, Phys. Rev. E 101, 32310 (2020).
  8. T. Carleman, Application de la théorie des équations intégrales linéaires aux systèmes d'équations différentielles non linéaires, Acta Math. 59, 63 (1932).
  9. B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 17, 315 (1931).
  10. K. G. Grosse-Erdmann and A. P. Manguillot, Linear Chaos (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2011).
  11. C. Beck and F. Schögl, Thermodynamics of Chaotic Systems, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Studies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  12. Edited by K. Kowalski and W. H. Steeb, Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Carleman Linearization (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
  13. S. L. Brunton, M. Marko Budišić, E. Kaiser, and J. N. Kutz. Modern Koopman theory for dynamical systems, SIAM Rev. 64, 229 (2022)
  14. X. Ouvrard, J. M. L Goff, and S. Marchand-Maillet, Adjacency and tensor representation in general hypergraphs. Part 2: Multisets, hb-graphs and related e-adjacency tensors, arXiv:1805.11952.
  15. X. Ouvrard, J.-M. Le Goff, and S. Marchand-Maillet, Exchange-based diffusion in hb-graphs: Highlighting complex relationships in multimedia collections (extended version), Multimedia Tools Appl. 80, 22429 (2021).
  16. M. Aguiar, C. Bick, and A. Dias, Network dynamics with higher-order interactions: Coupled cell hypernetworks for identical cells and synchrony, Nonlinearity 36, 4641 (2023).
  17. A. Amini, C. Zheng, Q. Sun, and N. Motee. Carleman linearization of nonlinear systems and its finite-section approximations, arXiv:2207.07755.
  18. N. Črnjarić-Žic, S. Maćešić, and I. Mezić, Koopman operator spectrum for random dynamical systems, J. Nonlin. Sci. 30, 2007 (2020).
  19. S. Klus, F. Nüske, S. Peitz, J. H. Niemann, C. Clementi, and C. Schütte, Data-driven approximation of the Koopman generator: Model reduction, system identification, and control, Physica D 406, 132416 (2020).
  20. S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N Kutz. Koopman invariant subspaces and finite linear representations of nonlinear dynamical systems for control, PLoS One 11, e0150171 (2016).
  21. S. P. Cornelius, W. L. Kath, and A. E. Motter, Realistic control of network dynamics, Nat. Commun. 4, 1942 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation