Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Normal-field evolution and the breakdown of classical tearing in current sheets

Grzegorz Kowal* and Diego A. Falceta-Gonçalves†

  • *Contact author: grzegorz.kowal@usp.br
  • †Contact author: dfalceta@usp.br

Phys. Rev. E 114, 055204 – Published 6 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1zwk-c77f

Abstract

Classical resistive tearing theory assumes a prescribed current-sheet equilibrium, but a finite normal magnetic field can evolve the background on the tearing timescale. For a transversely pressure-balanced Harris profile of initial half-thickness a and asymptotic reconnecting-field magnitude B0, threaded by uniform Bn (ξ≡Bn/B0), we derive an exact evolution in ideal magnetohydrodynamics: counterpropagating Alfvénic fronts broaden the neutral layer and generate a sheet-parallel flow with velocity gradients on its two flanks. The same normal field enters the linearized perturbation equations directly through ideal transport, alongside advection and flow-curvature terms from the evolving velocity profile. Inner-layer estimates recover ξcrit∼S−3/4 for the breakdown of the resistive balance at the classical fastest-growing scale, where S is the Lundquist number based on a. Numerical frozen-profile calculations show that growing modes can persist after central resistive dominance is lost; eigenfunction comparisons at fixed wave number and predominantly Doppler-shifted propagation support a normal-field-modified continuation of classical tearing. The normal field supplies no net perturbation energy. Energy extraction from the reconnecting-field gradient dominates at small and moderate widths and weakens as the sheet broadens. The velocity-gradient contribution becomes comparable only in broad, weakened modes, where it partly offsets the loss without reversing the decline in growth. For the representative case S=106, magnetic Prandtl number Prm=0, and ξ=10−4, the maximum growth rate falls by a factor of about ten from its initial value when the neutral-layer half-width w reaches w/a≃1.59, where the growth and broadening times become equal. Only about 0.18 additional upper-envelope e-folds are estimated between this crossing and w/a=2, where the growth rate is about 25 times smaller than its initial value, and the instantaneous spectrum remains unstable. These results support dynamical suppression of further linear amplification over the sampled evolution, while nonlinear island or plasmoid formation remains unresolved. Current-sheet disruption criteria must therefore account for both direct modification of the inner balance and normal-field-driven background evolution.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth, Finite-resistivity instabilities of a sheet pinch, Phys. Fluids 6, 459 (1963).
  2. N. F. Loureiro, A. A. Schekochihin, and S. C. Cowley, Instability of current sheets and formation of plasmoid chains, Phys. Plasmas 14, 100703 (2007).
  3. A. Bhattacharjee, Y.-M. Huang, H. Yang, and B. Rogers, Fast reconnection in high-Lundquist-number plasmas due to the plasmoid instability, Phys. Plasmas 16, 112102 (2009).
  4. L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y.-M. Huang, and A. Bhattacharjee, General theory of the plasmoid instability, Phys. Plasmas 23, 100702 (2016).
  5. N. F. Loureiro and S. Boldyrev, Role of magnetic reconnection in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 245101 (2017).
  6. A. Mallet, A. A. Schekochihin, and B. D. G. Chandran, Disruption of sheet-like structures in Alfvénic turbulence by magnetic reconnection, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 4862 (2017).
  7. A. K. Galishnikova, M. W. Kunz, and A. A. Schekochihin, Tearing instability and current-sheet disruption in the turbulent dynamo, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041027 (2022).
  8. S. Wang, R. Wang, Q. Lu, H. Fu, and S. Wang, Direct evidence of secondary reconnection inside filamentary currents of magnetic flux ropes during magnetic reconnection, Nat. Commun. 11, 3964 (2020).
  9. X. Yan, Z. Xue, C. Jiang, E. R. Priest, B. Kliem, L. Yang, J. Wang, D. Kong, Y. Song, X. Feng, and Z. Liu, Fast plasmoid-mediated reconnection in a solar flare, Nat. Commun. 13, 640 (2022).
  10. M. R. Bakrania, I. J. Rae, A. P. Walsh, D. Verscharen, A. W. Smith, C. Forsyth, and A. Tenerani, Direct evidence of magnetic reconnection onset via the tearing instability, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 9, 869491 (2022).
  11. B. Coppi, R. Galvao, R. Pellat, M. Rosenbluth, and P. Rutherford, Resistive internal kink modes, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 2, 533 (1976).
  12. F. Pucci and M. Velli, Reconnection of quasi-singular current sheets: The “ideal” tearing mode, Astrophys. J. Lett. 780, L19 (2014).
  13. X. L. Chen and P. J. Morrison, Resistive tearing instability with equilibrium shear flow, Phys. Fluids B 2, 495 (1990).
  14. L. Ofman, X. L. Chen, P. J. Morrison, and R. S. Steinolfson, Resistive tearing mode instability with shear flow and viscosity, Phys. Fluids B 3, 1364 (1991).
  15. D. A. Uzdensky and N. F. Loureiro, Magnetic reconnection onset via disruption of a forming current sheet by the tearing instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 105003 (2016).
  16. E. A. Tolman, N. F. Loureiro, and D. A. Uzdensky, Development of tearing instability in a current sheet forming by sheared incompressible flow, J. Plasma Phys. 84, 905840115 (2018).
  17. V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, J. C. Perez, and S. Boldyrev, Statistical analysis of current sheets in three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 771, 124 (2013).
  18. C. Dong, L. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, L. Comisso, T. A. Sandstrom, and A. Bhattacharjee, Reconnection-driven energy cascade in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Sci. Adv. 8, eabn7627 (2022).
  19. Z. J. Rong, W. X. Wan, C. Shen, X. Li, M. W. Dunlop, A. A. Petrukovich, T. L. Zhang, and E. Lucek, Statistical survey on the magnetic structure in magnetotail current sheets, J. Geophys. Res. 116, A09218 (2011).
  20. I. Zaitsev, G. Cozzani, M. Alho, K. Horaites, H. Zhou, A. Kit, Y. Pfau-Kempf, S. Hoilijoki, U. Ganse, M. Battarbee, K. Papadakis, J. Suni, M. Dubart, F. Tesema-Kebede, A. Workayehu, V. Tarvus, L. Kotipalo, V. Koikkalainen, L. Turc, and M. Palmroth, Ion-mediated tearing and kink instabilities in the Earth's magnetosphere: Hybrid-Vlasov simulations, J. Geophys. Res. 130, e2024JA032615 (2025).
  21. J. Egedal, On a plasma sheath with a small normal magnetic field separating regions of oppositely directed magnetic field, Phys. Plasmas 30, 112903 (2023).
  22. B. V. Somov and A. I. Verneta, Magnetic reconnection in high-temperature plasma of solar flares - part three, Sol. Phys. 117, 89 (1988).
  23. B. V. Somov and A. I. Verneta, Magnetic reconnection in a high-temperature plasma of solar flares - part four, Sol. Phys. 120, 93 (1989).
  24. B. V. Somov and A. I. Verneta, Tearing instability of reconnecting current sheets in space plasmas, Space Sci. Rev. 65, 253 (1993).
  25. E. G. Harris, On a plasma sheath separating regions of oppositely directed magnetic field, Nuovo Cim. 23, 115 (1962).
  26. T. Berlok and C. Pfrommer, On the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability with smooth initial conditions-linear theory and simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 908 (2019).
  27. https://github.com/gkowal/tearing-eigenmodes.
  28. C. Meringolo, F. Pucci, G. Nisticò, O. Pezzi, S. Servidio, and F. Malara, Joint action of phase mixing and nonlinear effects in MHD waves propagating in coronal loops, Astron. Astrophys. 688, A12 (2024).
  29. https://github.com/gkowal/psecas.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation